When an eyewitness stands up in court and identifies the person they say committed a crime, the impact can be powerful and effective. This dramatic testimony can be sincere and honest. It can also be wrong and tragically lead to wrongful convictions, lifelong incarcerations, and even the death penalty. But how can this happen? The witness is telling the court what they truly believe and remember. And therein lies the problem: memory, the often fuzzy and malleable recollections of events in the past.
In the latest edition of Psychological Science in the Public Interest, researchers look at the problems with eyewitness misidentifications in the courtroom and explain why prosecutors and law enforcement should test a witness’s memory of a suspect only once. Joining us is John Wixted, a researcher at the University of California at San Diego and first author on this article.
2022 Spence Award Mini Episode: Investigating Complex Brain Processes
2022 Spence Award Mini Episode: How People Manage Their Emotions
Mini Episode: How We Internalize Disorders
Constellations Across Cultures: How Our Visual Systems Pick Out Patterns in the Night Sky
Freedom vs Security: Can We Find the Right Balance?
Debunking Four Common Myths of Psychological Science
The Grieving Brain
The Top 10 of 2021: Psychological Science in the News
Better Behavior With Virtual Reality
Recipe for Success: Entrepreneurship and Psychological Science
Toys, Tots, and Gender
Science Rewind: Revisiting Three of Our Favorite Early Stories
The Ghastly Impact of Being Ghosted
Why Some People Won‘t Get Vaccinated
Psychological Interventions for the Treatment of Chronic Pain in Adults
Skeptical ‘Deep Dive‘ on the Myers-Briggs Test
Microaggressions: What We Know and Should Know
Research Roundup: What‘s News in the APS Observer
Gender in a Nonbinary World
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Poetry of Science
Behavioral Grooves Podcast
Hidden Brain
The Psychology Podcast
The Science of Happiness