In the past decade, scientists in psychology and elsewhere have changed a lot in how we evaluate what makes research replicable, robust, and credible. New theories and findings in metascience and methodology - and repopularization of old ones - have given us new ways to think critically about research. But what do we do when these concepts and arguments are used poorly or bad faith - applied wrongly or selectively, or misused to sow broad doubt in science? In this episode we talk about what happens when people try to claim the mantle of open science to advance some other agenda. How can we distinguish good use of open-science arguments from bad? How can scientists who care about open science effectively call out these arguments? Plus: A letter about negotiating for a partner who has a non-academic job.
Links:
The Black Goat is hosted by Sanjay Srivastava, Alexa Tullett, and Simine Vazire. Find us on the web at www.theblackgoatpodcast.com, on Twitter at @blackgoatpod, on Facebook at facebook.com/blackgoatpod/, and on instagram at @blackgoatpod. You can email us at letters@theblackgoatpodcast.com. You can subscribe to us on iTunes or Stitcher.
Our theme music is Peak Beak by Doctor Turtle, available on freemusicarchive.org under a Creative Commons noncommercial attribution license. Our logo was created by Jude Weaver.
This is episode 64. It was recorded on August 27, 2019.
Creativity and Rigor
Welcome To The Big Leagues
The Year 2017 in Review
Whodunnit
Significant Feelings
We Were Never Cool
The Learning Curve
Disagreeing about Science
The Meaning of It All (with Anna Alexandrova)
All Your Idols Have Clay Feet
Big Time
SIPSapalooza
A Psychometrician's Guide to Popularity
The Iron Psychologist (with Jamil Zaki)
'Cause You're There For Me Too
It's So Complicated
Nullius in verba
I Felt Like a Real Scientist
Confessions of a Replicator (with Rich Lucas)
Dancing On Our Own
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Museum of the Missing
Strange by Nature Podcast
The Poetry of Science
Sasquatch Chronicles
Hidden Brain