Many important questions about cause and effect are impractical to answer with a randomized experiment. What should we do instead? In this episode we talk about doing causal inference with observational data. Has psychology's historical obsession with internal validity led it, ironically, to think about causal inference in an unsophisticated way? Can formal analytic tools like directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) tell us how to do better studies? Or is their main lesson don't bother trying? How do norms and incentives in publishing help or hurt in doing better causal inference? Plus: We answer a letter about applying to psychology grad school when your background is in data science.
Links:
The Black Goat is hosted by Sanjay Srivastava, Alexa Tullett, and Simine Vazire. Find us on the web at www.theblackgoatpodcast.com, on Twitter at @blackgoatpod, on Facebook at facebook.com/blackgoatpod/, and on instagram at @blackgoatpod. You can email us at letters@theblackgoatpodcast.com. You can subscribe to us on iTunes or Stitcher.
Our theme music is Peak Beak by Doctor Turtle, available on freemusicarchive.org under a Creative Commons noncommercial attribution license. Our logo was created by Jude Weaver.
This is episode 76. It was recorded on March 16, 2020.
Relevant To Your Interests
Testing 1-2-3
Our Most Significant Episode Ever
Don't Trust Me, I'm A Doctor
What Comes Next?
Nobody Goes There Anymore, It's Too Crowded
Being Different
Psychological Science Is Made Out Of People
Because Reasons (with Ellen Evers)
Situation Normal
Come Together
You Can Go Your Own Way (with Katie Corker)
Tech Tales (with Paul Litvak)
The PhD Who Caught the Car
A Blooming, Buzzing Confusion
A Jury of Your Nerdy Peers
Hanging in the Balance
Aboard the Hype Train
Moving along
Academic Kindness
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Museum of the Missing
Strange by Nature Podcast
The Poetry of Science
Sasquatch Chronicles
Hidden Brain