Organising, attending and submitting abstracts to conferences with Victoria Christodoulides
In this episode I talk to Victoria Christodoulides, a PGR at the University of Bath and the University of the West of England about organising, attending and submitting abstracts to conferences. Victoria and I are both on the committee oif the Research Ethics Conference 2021, which currently has a call for papers out. You can find out more on the conference website.
Music credit: Happy Boy Theme Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
00:00:09,000 --> 00:00:13,000
Hello and welcome to R, D and The Inbetweena.
00:00:13,000 --> 00:00:32,000
I'm your host, Kelly Preece, and every fortnight I talk to a different guest about researches, development and everything in between.
00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:39,000
Hello and welcome to this episode of R,D and the In Betweens. Today, I'm going to be talking to Victoria Christodoulides
00:00:39,000 --> 00:00:43,000
who is working with me on the conference committee for a new conference on Research Ethics.
00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:48,000
It's gonna be taking place at the University of Exeter next June. During this episode,
00:00:48,000 --> 00:00:53,000
we're going to talk about the ethics conference we're involved in and how we kind of
00:00:53,000 --> 00:00:59,000
got interested in having those wider critical discussions about research ethics,
00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:03,000
but also attending and submitting an abstract to your first conference. And some top tips.
00:01:03,000 --> 00:01:11,000
So if you're new to attending conferences, this will be a really, really good insight into what the experience is like.
00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:22,000
So, Victoria, are you happy to introduce yourself? My name is Victoria Christodoulides and I am based in the University of Bath,
00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:29,000
but I work in an interdisciplinary PhD project with UWE as well.
00:01:29,000 --> 00:01:34,000
So yes, in my second nearly third year.
00:01:34,000 --> 00:01:37,000
Now of doing doing that. Yeah.
00:01:37,000 --> 00:01:49,000
Can you tell me a little bit about the project project. So my my project itself is looking at childhood trauma, recovery, literacy.
00:01:49,000 --> 00:01:51,000
So the kind of discourses,
00:01:51,000 --> 00:02:07,000
narratives that are surround childhood trauma and the recovery practises and really trying to through kind of participatory action research framework,
00:02:07,000 --> 00:02:21,000
work with survivors to reimagine what recovery and practising recovery could be and how recovery could be understood,
00:02:21,000 --> 00:02:26,000
perhaps differently to what it currently is.
00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:40,000
As it's predominately dominated by what we would classify as the biomedical framework to looking at the psychotherapeutic or medicinal practises,
00:02:40,000 --> 00:02:47,000
that sounds really fascinating and perhaps unsurprising then that you've become involved with the Research Ethics Conference.
00:02:47,000 --> 00:02:56,000
Given that, I imagine you're encountering some really deeply complex ethical issues through the course of your research.
00:02:56,000 --> 00:03:10,000
Yes. So I did an MRes course, prior to starting my PhD, and that's kind of really when the can of worms opened up for me and ethics.
00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:19,000
I haven't had any of the kind of I supppose.
00:03:19,000 --> 00:03:25,000
The bio medicinal ethical challenges that some people might get.
00:03:25,000 --> 00:03:29,000
But I do get and have had quite a lot of.
00:03:29,000 --> 00:03:36,000
Complexity in the the ethics proposals that I have, one being.
00:03:36,000 --> 00:03:44,000
That's quite it, because it's quite complex projects, because it's an emergent design, participatory action research.
00:03:44,000 --> 00:03:48,000
I'm going to call it PAR because it's much, much shorter.
00:03:48,000 --> 00:03:58,000
But the PAR is quite complex framework. So the ethical procedures are quite important.
00:03:58,000 --> 00:04:03,000
They're more than you know, obviously, they need to be thorough, but they a quite lengthy.
00:04:03,000 --> 00:04:08,000
Because. Because it's emergent. You have to talk about things that you might include.
00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:14,000
That might happen. And and that can be quite challenging.
00:04:14,000 --> 00:04:23,000
But also, there are the challenges around working with what would be classified as a vulnerable population.
00:04:23,000 --> 00:04:29,000
So you have those kind of ethical challenges as well.
00:04:29,000 --> 00:04:35,000
And I suppose even more recently, that the things that I'm looking at.
00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:41,000
And really in the thick of at the moment, because I'm not quite. Haven't quite done my data collection yet.
00:04:41,000 --> 00:04:52,000
But how to do participatory research in COVID times is quite, quite challenging.
00:04:52,000 --> 00:04:58,000
So that's obviously some of the challenges involved in your particular research.
00:04:58,000 --> 00:05:07,000
Yes. Kind of got you. Interested in ethics or considering ethics more broadly in the kind of field of
00:05:07,000 --> 00:05:12,000
research and therefore wanting to be involved in the research ethics conference.
00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:26,000
So I think I would probably say that my experiences of ethics and possibly because the the approach I've taken to the projects
00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:37,000
that I've been involved in have been maybe a little bit more abstract dealing with vulnerable groups in ways that perhaps
00:05:37,000 --> 00:05:49,000
added a little bit more complexity really opened up to me when I was going through the process in it for my ethics applications
00:05:49,000 --> 00:06:05,000
just felt like there wasn't a huge amount of guidance or information around around ethics that I felt were fit for purpose.
00:06:05,000 --> 00:06:16,000
And talking with other students, staff from, you know, not just our university, but, you know, wherever it seemed to go.
00:06:16,000 --> 00:06:24,000
Even I was in a conference in Barcelona having the same conversations with senior professors who were going,
00:06:24,000 --> 00:06:26,000
yeah, no, it's the same with our university, actually.
00:06:26,000 --> 00:06:34,000
We are, you know, there there's there's all this talk about we need to be providing ethical research.
00:06:34,000 --> 00:06:43,000
But actually, what does that actually mean? And when I thought about how well, you know, with my introduction to ethics,
00:06:43,000 --> 00:06:48,000
I can remember one seminar and I appreciate every university may be different,
00:06:48,000 --> 00:06:57,000
but I remember having one seminar talking about just kind of what we need to think for and having a few things online to go through as a course.
00:06:57,000 --> 00:07:04,000
And that was pretty much it. But it's so much more complex and I think.
00:07:04,000 --> 00:07:08,000
Wanted to be involved in the conference was one I.
00:07:08,000 --> 00:07:17,000
I feel very strongly with my experiences in completing ethics forms and being involved in research that there is
00:07:17,000 --> 00:07:29,000
so much more to the process of ethics and how our research can be ethically grounded than it is currently.
00:07:29,000 --> 00:07:38,000
And I think it is often an afterthought. It is often a checklist and it would be great.
00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:46,000
And through this conference and I can see that being a really strong catalyst for it being
00:07:46,000 --> 00:07:51,000
a starting point to kind of extend these conversations and dialogues and going well look
00:07:51,000 --> 00:07:56,000
you know. Okay, people are getting ethical approval and completing their research.
00:07:56,000 --> 00:07:57,000
But how can we make that better?
00:07:57,000 --> 00:08:07,000
How can we make the researchers more ethically grounded from start to finish of their projects and even before completing it?
00:08:07,000 --> 00:08:11,000
But also understanding the process is a bit more what it is that they need to complete.
00:08:11,000 --> 00:08:18,000
What what you need to think about in terms of provision of information, the information sheets,
00:08:18,000 --> 00:08:23,000
that you get all sorts of things, but that it can be quite complex and difficult to follow.
00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:30,000
And I think, you know, as I said, you know, speaking to those people just think it's currently not quite fit for purpose.
00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:38,000
And I think something like the ethics conference has got so many moving parts that can support that.
00:08:38,000 --> 00:08:45,000
I think I think that that really excites me to be part of something like.
00:08:45,000 --> 00:08:56,000
Yeah, absolutely. And I I mean, I feel the same. It's becoming a very different perspective in terms of thinking about the the training
00:08:56,000 --> 00:09:01,000
side of that and how we put the support structures in place and where the knowledge sits.
00:09:01,000 --> 00:09:09,000
So. We're here to talk really about about conferences and perhaps sort of.
00:09:09,000 --> 00:09:13,000
Submitting a abstract to a conference or attending a conference for the first
00:09:13,000 --> 00:09:17,000
time to help people thinking about attending the research ethics conference,
00:09:17,000 --> 00:09:28,000
but also who might be at the start of their research journey and kind of feeling a bit mystified by these magical things called conferences.
00:09:28,000 --> 00:09:34,000
So can you tell me a little bit about the first time you attended a conference?
00:09:34,000 --> 00:09:43,000
Oh, the first time in attendance at the conference. Yes, it was during my time as an MRes students.
00:09:43,000 --> 00:09:48,000
And I didn't submit an abstract to that one, but I did.
00:09:48,000 --> 00:09:57,000
For the next one. But attending the conference. That first time funnily enought felt quite nerve racking.
00:09:57,000 --> 00:10:01,000
And I think a lot of things were going through my mind.
00:10:01,000 --> 00:10:05,000
One was. You know.
00:10:05,000 --> 00:10:10,000
I'm going to be the one that really looks stupid coming to this conference,
00:10:10,000 --> 00:10:21,000
all these great speakers and professors and people who are more expert in their line of enquiry than I am.
00:10:21,000 --> 00:10:24,000
And it kind of initially put me off going.
00:10:24,000 --> 00:10:29,000
And, you know, I'm glad I pushed through that nervousness,
00:10:29,000 --> 00:10:34,000
because when I when I have then subsequently gone on to and I think there's always a little bit of that.
00:10:34,000 --> 00:10:44,000
When you when you come to conferences sometimes is some actually it doesn't really matter.
00:10:44,000 --> 00:10:58,000
And these conferences really provide a fantastic space, not just for learning, but also networking and being able to ask questions.
00:10:58,000 --> 00:11:02,000
That's something you can't you can't necessarily do.
00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:13,000
If you're just watching a video or just reading a paper, you you get to maybe ask questions around your own research projects.
00:11:13,000 --> 00:11:24,000
And, you know, I've had some great opportunities, when I've gone to conferences to speak with people who are more knowledgeable than I am and kind of go
00:11:24,000 --> 00:11:29,000
Can I borrow five minutes of your time? Most of the time. People are really happy to.
00:11:29,000 --> 00:11:36,000
And, you know, they're very interested listening to your know your project and kind of go look you know this is the problem I've got.
00:11:36,000 --> 00:11:40,000
I'm not you know, I was thinking about what you were saying. You know, I'm not quite sure.
00:11:40,000 --> 00:11:45,000
And I actually so many times, it gives you great ideas and sometimes even problems.
00:11:45,000 --> 00:11:48,000
It's a link about that you haven't thought about before.
00:11:48,000 --> 00:11:59,000
But they are just such a great space for me to be able to move your ideas and project forwards, whatever that might might be.
00:11:59,000 --> 00:12:10,000
Yeah. And I think that that kind of sort of imposter syndrome that you have is is really, really common, but also.
00:12:10,000 --> 00:12:16,000
Sort of against the nature of sort of what conferences are, which is, you know,
00:12:16,000 --> 00:12:23,000
conferences generally aren't places where you find concrete answers, that they're the places where we.
00:12:23,000 --> 00:12:29,000
Discuss the complex ideas and try to grapple with them.
00:12:29,000 --> 00:12:33,000
And, you know, certainly in terms of presenting at conferences,
00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:38,000
people aren't necessarily expecting you to have sort of a formal finished product, you know?
00:12:38,000 --> 00:12:49,000
Yes. Is and conference presentations are a great place to. Explore your ideas and explore how you're collating your ideas and analysing data.
00:12:49,000 --> 00:12:52,000
And it's not necessarily about kind of having the finished product,
00:12:52,000 --> 00:12:58,000
but about the opportunity to enter into dialogue about where your thinking is at that moment in time.
00:12:58,000 --> 00:13:03,000
Absolutely. Yeah, I think you're dead. Right. And you know
00:13:03,000 --> 00:13:18,000
That's the the the beauty really of conferences, I think is my thoughts around going to conferences is that as long as there's a general
00:13:18,000 --> 00:13:25,000
link or even more of a specific general to specific link to your to your project.
00:13:25,000 --> 00:13:33,000
And in this case, ethics kind of applies to everybody. The conference that we're going to be holding.
00:13:33,000 --> 00:13:37,000
You know, everyone can come. But generally speaking, you know,
00:13:37,000 --> 00:13:44,000
there'll be conferences which might be a bit more aligned to what you're researching or very specific to an area of work that you're focussing on.
00:13:44,000 --> 00:13:56,000
But the real beauty about it, as you were saying, is that, you know, there aren't necessarily concrete finished projects.
00:13:56,000 --> 00:14:02,000
You can actually come with your idea. And I've done that when I when I delivered a presentation.
00:14:02,000 --> 00:14:07,000
I kind of was talking about what it is that I wanted to do. And based on some of the work did in my MRes
00:14:07,000 --> 00:14:12,000
Right. You know. And so it doesn't it, you know, things that have to be finished.
00:14:12,000 --> 00:14:25,000
And what's great about that is that there are so many different takes that you can be exposed to and how to approach work.
00:14:25,000 --> 00:14:31,000
No, in theories in methodology is all sorts of different things that you can have a look
00:14:31,000 --> 00:14:38,000
at that you don't necessarily get access to as easily as you may have done before.
00:14:38,000 --> 00:14:48,000
And I think what's really important about that for or our learning is if we if we only travel down the routes of reading, watching,
00:14:48,000 --> 00:15:06,000
engaging with one specific school of thought and one area of work, we actually don't, we actually inhibit our ability to argue our own standpoint.
00:15:06,000 --> 00:15:13,000
And I believe quite strongly that if we engage with these different perspectives,
00:15:13,000 --> 00:15:20,000
which you do get at conferences, which is why that's a fantastic really, you get the opportunity to go.
00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:29,000
I never thought of that. You know, I could argue my point more strongly because of this or actually that's really made me question my perspective.
00:15:29,000 --> 00:15:33,000
I need to think about strengthening my own argument based on what this person says.
00:15:33,000 --> 00:15:42,000
Well, that's a great example for me to pull on and use within my my work and make it relevant to what I'm talking about.
00:15:42,000 --> 00:15:48,000
So, yeah, I'm a strong advocate. Absolutely.
00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:56,000
And, you know, we're we're talking about doing something at the conference, which is which is very much kind of about not having answers.
00:15:56,000 --> 00:16:05,000
So it's a discussion panel about how ethical training isn't fit for purpose and and how
00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:13,000
we and a kind of exploration by a number of panelists and with the people attending.
00:16:13,000 --> 00:16:16,000
About what? You know, what we think that.
00:16:16,000 --> 00:16:26,000
We actually need in terms of training and skills and support to underpin ethical research, practise and, you know,
00:16:26,000 --> 00:16:31,000
we're not going with the answers about what we think that training should be, but rather with the open question of going.
00:16:31,000 --> 00:16:35,000
We know that what we have is an. Isn't doing the job it needs to.
00:16:35,000 --> 00:16:41,000
So let's have a conversation. You know, let's start the conversation now.
00:16:41,000 --> 00:16:46,000
and not necessarily find the answers, but at least. Kind of.
00:16:46,000 --> 00:16:50,000
Propel the. Conversation forward.
00:16:50,000 --> 00:16:53,000
Yes, exactly. Absolutely, yeah.
00:16:53,000 --> 00:17:01,000
And I think, you know, again, great place for a conference is to be able to kind of it's not just about people talking at you.
00:17:01,000 --> 00:17:09,000
And I think the ethics conference that we're putting together, we've got workshops, you know, supporting
00:17:09,000 --> 00:17:20,000
We've got a good cooperation with different organisations and businesses as well as, you know, students.
00:17:20,000 --> 00:17:25,000
And I think, you know, if you take the panel in that we're talking about there around the fit for purpose ethical training,
00:17:25,000 --> 00:17:28,000
I think, you know, that's a really good example of,
00:17:28,000 --> 00:17:38,000
you know, we're not here just talking at people saying this is what we think should change because, you know, we really value being from other people.
00:17:38,000 --> 00:17:45,000
And, you know, what would be great is we have the same range of people talking on the panel,
00:17:45,000 --> 00:17:53,000
but having a range of perspectives from the audience to kind of go, hey, that this is my experience, you know?
00:17:53,000 --> 00:18:00,000
And, you know, how how can we utilise these experiences to better our processes?
00:18:00,000 --> 00:18:06,000
And I think the beauty of ethics and as I mentioned at the beginning of this conversation,
00:18:06,000 --> 00:18:10,000
is there's been so many people that are expected to from all walks of life.
00:18:10,000 --> 00:18:13,000
Who just say the same thing that it's not fit for purpose
00:18:13,000 --> 00:18:22,000
This could be something that I think should transcend across universities, across the education system for research.
00:18:22,000 --> 00:18:30,000
And it could be so easily done if we can come together and say easily rolling their eyes.
00:18:30,000 --> 00:18:35,000
Not easily. I appreciate it. But there is definitely, I think, a route here.
00:18:35,000 --> 00:18:42,000
That could be made easier. Yeah, because collectively we have the knowledge.
00:18:42,000 --> 00:18:47,000
It's just it's sitting in us with so many things that sitting in individual pockets right now.
00:18:47,000 --> 00:18:52,000
And yet, you know, the the discussion we're having is about bringing those people together.
00:18:52,000 --> 00:18:54,000
And on the broader concerns as well about, you know,
00:18:54,000 --> 00:19:04,000
working with different groups and businesses and charities and education organisations outside of higher education.
00:19:04,000 --> 00:19:08,000
You know, again, it's bringing that breadth of knowledge and understanding together.
00:19:08,000 --> 00:19:13,000
And, you know, that is a lot of what research is doing now is about.
00:19:13,000 --> 00:19:21,000
Absolutely. Interdisciplinary is about connections to industry and practise and bringing together different forms
00:19:21,000 --> 00:19:26,000
of knowledge or different kinds of knowledge to give us that sense that something richer.
00:19:26,000 --> 00:19:31,000
Absolutely, and I think the great thing about this conference is that that we can do that.
00:19:31,000 --> 00:19:40,000
I think the the bringing the best practises is exactly what I'd love to see happen is I'm sure you know,
00:19:40,000 --> 00:19:47,000
I know different universities have difficult ethical, different ethical processes as the same departments.
00:19:47,000 --> 00:19:55,000
I think it's we need to extend those dialogues and conversations to kind of see where is the best practise in a way,
00:19:55,000 --> 00:20:00,000
where can we pull on that improve that across across the board.
00:20:00,000 --> 00:20:05,000
So I agree Yeah. So. Thinking about.
00:20:05,000 --> 00:20:10,000
Abstracts and kind of submitting abstracts to a conference. What was that like?
00:20:10,000 --> 00:20:24,000
The first time you did it? Oh, so the first time I did it, I, I had basically just started my my p h.
00:20:24,000 --> 00:20:28,000
D. So it finished my MRes and just started my PhD
00:20:28,000 --> 00:20:34,000
And I'd been off to talk because of.
00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:46,000
They are at her empathy conference regarding empathy in research, and I have been asked to talk because the work that I was doing,
00:20:46,000 --> 00:20:52,000
interlinks with concepts of empathy and some of the practises we were doing.
00:20:52,000 --> 00:20:59,000
And I felt very, very, very out of my depth because, as we mentioned, you know, even though it didn't matter to me,
00:20:59,000 --> 00:21:07,000
I feel I should be coming to this conversation with these great speakers with, you know, full blown.
00:21:07,000 --> 00:21:14,000
Here's my project take. My answers, you know, here's the the outcome and what I'm going to do with it.
00:21:14,000 --> 00:21:21,000
Hurrah! That was very much. This is just my ideas for my PhD
00:21:21,000 --> 00:21:33,000
I did base it on some of the work that I'd done within my MRes because how I utilised the MRes for my PhD.
00:21:33,000 --> 00:21:40,000
So I completed the abstract, I think was.
00:21:40,000 --> 00:21:46,000
It always seems more daunting than that we really need it, but it really needs to be energy.
00:21:46,000 --> 00:21:54,000
You pointed out the imposter syndrome really does for me it does raise its ugly head.
00:21:54,000 --> 00:22:01,000
But I think when you've got a good structure to follow for the abstract,
00:22:01,000 --> 00:22:08,000
I think we've got some tips and advice on how to structure that as well as we've got workshops as well,
00:22:08,000 --> 00:22:14,000
which I've been really looking forward to to to listen to that's helped people.
00:22:14,000 --> 00:22:22,000
But I think when you've got those things and I didn't have any access to that, it makes it a lot easier.
00:22:22,000 --> 00:22:30,000
But I think when you send it off, I think it's always good to get other people to to check it over, see what they think.
00:22:30,000 --> 00:22:34,000
Know you got the right idea in how to structure it.
00:22:34,000 --> 00:22:41,000
Maybe ask your supervisor to have a quick glance if you got any advice or anybody else, you know,
00:22:41,000 --> 00:22:51,000
who is who who completed abstracts before and after and stuff on kind of, you know, very quickly got a, you know
00:22:51,000 --> 00:22:57,000
Yes, this sounds great. We would like to have your presentation.
00:22:57,000 --> 00:23:00,000
And it was then quite a straightforward process for me.
00:23:00,000 --> 00:23:05,000
I appreciate is different depending on what the conference it is.
00:23:05,000 --> 00:23:10,000
But I believe ours is is quite simple for submitting abstracts.
00:23:10,000 --> 00:23:21,000
But yes, there's always that slight nervousness of submitting something to know because you want you want to be accepted and approached for it.
00:23:21,000 --> 00:23:32,000
But I would say I think, you know, even the process of writing an abstract.
00:23:32,000 --> 00:23:39,000
Even if you don't get chosen and there could be a plethora of reasons why you may not be.
00:23:39,000 --> 00:23:52,000
But even if you're not, the the whole process of working through writing an abstract actually can help you with your own project.
00:23:52,000 --> 00:23:58,000
And, you know, it is really useful to do because you've got to be succinct.
00:23:58,000 --> 00:24:01,000
And it's great, especially even early,
00:24:01,000 --> 00:24:10,000
early stages of your project to be able to kind of maybe conceptiualise and more concisely what it is that you're doing.
00:24:10,000 --> 00:24:15,000
And then even further down the line, you've always got some more information that you could pull on.
00:24:15,000 --> 00:24:25,000
But again, even doing it kind of mid to end of your project or beyond if you're not a PhD student but a fully fledged academic.
00:24:25,000 --> 00:24:35,000
But if you if you know, it's great to be able just to utilise, as I said, conceptualise your ideas clearly
00:24:35,000 --> 00:24:42,000
So, again, I'd really welcome anyone at all stages to to engage in that process.
00:24:42,000 --> 00:24:50,000
Yeah. And I think that thing that you're saying is really key about actually forcing you to hone in
00:24:50,000 --> 00:24:58,000
on or crystallise some of your ideas on some of those kind of overarching aims or arguments,
00:24:58,000 --> 00:25:03,000
because so much of what we do in academia is about long form writing.
00:25:03,000 --> 00:25:09,000
You know, I know that a journal article doesn't necessarily feel like long form writing, but to a lot of people, you know, 6000 words.
00:25:09,000 --> 00:25:12,000
It's quite a lot.
00:25:12,000 --> 00:25:23,000
You know, it's about having the time to kind of develop argument and to kind of build on ideas, or is actually that the real challenge is,
00:25:23,000 --> 00:25:30,000
is it okay, how can I describe this really succinctly in a way that communicates why it matters as well?
00:25:30,000 --> 00:25:31,000
00:25:31,000 --> 00:25:41,000
It's a really important skill and one that, you know, we forget when we are in the throes of writing reams and reams and reams of words, you know.
00:25:41,000 --> 00:25:49,000
Ninety thousand one hundred thousand words. It seems a few a few hundred
00:25:49,000 --> 00:26:01,000
It doesn't seem very much, but it's really important skill that I think, you know, when you do nothing but long writing, you can easily forget it.
00:26:01,000 --> 00:26:08,000
And it's one that you will absolutely carry forward with within your career, whatever career you go in to as well.
00:26:08,000 --> 00:26:14,000
You know, when you if you if you were going down the academic route, you'll be asked to submit abstracts in the future,
00:26:14,000 --> 00:26:25,000
you will be asked to submit journals which are shorter, you know, and you have to really tease out your your your key points.
00:26:25,000 --> 00:26:30,000
As you said, it needs to be crystallised and really clear with what you're doing.
00:26:30,000 --> 00:26:36,000
If you're not staying with academia, there are so many times working in business and in sales myself.
00:26:36,000 --> 00:26:43,000
There's been so many times I might have to be really concise with what I was saying.
00:26:43,000 --> 00:26:48,000
And I'm a waffle-r people listening to this or they can tell about it.
00:26:48,000 --> 00:26:54,000
It is a real skill, but that's. Absolutely.
00:26:54,000 --> 00:27:01,000
Anybody can benefit from. Obviously abstracts get chosen depending on what they want to go down.
00:27:01,000 --> 00:27:12,000
You've got lots of options for how people might want to creatively discuss their work.
00:27:12,000 --> 00:27:22,000
Again, you've then got the opportunity to expand out and maybe do a poster, maybe do a panel, maybe do a presentation.
00:27:22,000 --> 00:27:27,000
And again, these are all skills that you really, really do need practise.
00:27:27,000 --> 00:27:34,000
And so, you know, this is a great opportunity for people to do that.
00:27:34,000 --> 00:27:46,000
Yeah, for sure. And, you know, those those skills of articulation and summarising and kind of being able to talk about your research or being able to.
00:27:46,000 --> 00:27:54,000
Kind of communicate your research in a fewer amount of words, shall we say, and is an important skill,
00:27:54,000 --> 00:28:02,000
not just in kind of communicating with a broader kind of academic and non-academic audience, but also, you know, when it comes to your writing,
00:28:02,000 --> 00:28:10,000
when it comes to writing up, you aren't going to need to, even though you've got your 80 to 100 thousand words or, you know,
00:28:10,000 --> 00:28:16,000
whatever it is that you're aiming for, depending on what kind of research programme you're on, you're still going to need to be able to do that.
00:28:16,000 --> 00:28:22,000
You know, you've got an abstract to write, an introduction, a conclusion. You're going to need to make your argument clear throughout.
00:28:22,000 --> 00:28:26,000
That's a skill that's going to carry you through the written thesis as well.
00:28:26,000 --> 00:28:34,000
It's not just in kind of conference space research communication that that's useful.
00:28:34,000 --> 00:28:38,000
Absolutely. And I think the great thing when we've got to conference,
00:28:38,000 --> 00:28:50,000
which is just so cross disciplinary and I mean it feeds in to all areas of any work, you know, whether it's academic or not.
00:28:50,000 --> 00:28:53,000
That's, you know, and I'm we're coming in.
00:28:53,000 --> 00:29:04,000
It's been a few years now, but I think it's really prevalently been pushed quite heavily by research councils and organisations and so on,
00:29:04,000 --> 00:29:10,000
that we need to be demonstrating collaboration, demonstrating impact.
00:29:10,000 --> 00:29:26,000
And, you know, when you need to do that and often you have to work with different audiences and work into discipline or in an interdisciplinary way.
00:29:26,000 --> 00:29:31,000
Yes, I was going to say a bigger word. Make it short in an extraordinary way.
00:29:31,000 --> 00:29:39,000
And when you do that, it's actually, you know, if you're not speaking, even though you may be speaking to another academic,
00:29:39,000 --> 00:29:49,000
you have to be aware that actually, you know, that there are different languages, you know, across disciplines that people won't understand.
00:29:49,000 --> 00:29:57,000
So, again, when you're having to engage in writing abstracts and doing it for audiences,
00:29:57,000 --> 00:30:11,000
that may not be yorr direct discipline or area of thought or out to the organisation for developing skills that will enable you to.
00:30:11,000 --> 00:30:16,000
Explain what you're doing to anyone.
00:30:16,000 --> 00:30:25,000
Yes, rather than just that specific niche, that area that youre situated in.
00:30:25,000 --> 00:30:31,000
And I think that's really important as a said You know, when when we're looking more and more to to, you know, looking at grants,
00:30:31,000 --> 00:30:38,000
for example, or looking at, you know, working with other organisations, you have to do that.
00:30:38,000 --> 00:30:47,000
And it's not easy. I'm working in a collaborative, an interdisciplinary field.
00:30:47,000 --> 00:30:50,000
And it's not an easy process. So we need to develop those skills.
00:30:50,000 --> 00:30:56,000
So, again, these conferences provide that and especially one with, as I said,
00:30:56,000 --> 00:31:04,000
which such as ethics, the topic is already in the cross disciplinary setting.
00:31:04,000 --> 00:31:10,000
I wanted to also reflects on being involved in the organisation of a conference
00:31:10,000 --> 00:31:18,000
as a PhD student and what that's like and what kind of what you're gaining on,
00:31:18,000 --> 00:31:25,000
what you're learning from being kind of involved in that behind the scenes rather than just attending.
00:31:25,000 --> 00:31:38,000
This is an interesting one actually. I have never been involved in a conference before, so I really didn't know what to expect.
00:31:38,000 --> 00:31:47,000
I am I'm quite a busy individual and I was a little bit worried about how much time I needed to devote to this.
00:31:47,000 --> 00:31:53,000
And I would be wrong if I said that, you know, you didn't have to put time aside for it.
00:31:53,000 --> 00:32:07,000
And, you know, I'm I'm aware that different members of our team have varied responsibilities.
00:32:07,000 --> 00:32:09,000
And there are some who have more than others.
00:32:09,000 --> 00:32:19,000
So, you know, I think it's bearing and being I think coming to it being I was being really honest about what I could and couldn't do
00:32:19,000 --> 00:32:23,000
And I've been able to kind of extend extend that, you know,
00:32:23,000 --> 00:32:32,000
as I've got one of the more confident with that being being involved in the conference itself.
00:32:32,000 --> 00:32:40,000
Has been quite illuminating. And. illuminating a number of ways.
00:32:40,000 --> 00:32:48,000
One, I think I've been really bowled over by just how much stuff one can do,
00:32:48,000 --> 00:32:55,000
and I think you can make it complex, more complex and not simply depending to what you want to incorporate.
00:32:55,000 --> 00:33:00,000
And again, that depends on your team and the skills, I think, for this particular project.
00:33:00,000 --> 00:33:05,000
We again. Possibly because of the context of what we're talking about.
00:33:05,000 --> 00:33:14,000
We've really been able to expand. What is on offer and who can you who you can bring,
00:33:14,000 --> 00:33:20,000
what's in to the possibility of of the project which is extended and I've seen
00:33:20,000 --> 00:33:25,000
it grow and change in shifted in what we what we are looking to provide,
00:33:25,000 --> 00:33:32,000
what we can provide. You know, I. Great ideas. And I think that's been felt for me.
00:33:32,000 --> 00:33:43,000
What's been so interesting is learning from from everybody and kind of going over, you know, although that's not my role.
00:33:43,000 --> 00:33:47,000
I've seen what somebody else has done. And so that's really interesting.
00:33:47,000 --> 00:33:55,000
I never knew you could do that. I even down to programming. And a Microsoft Forms, for example, with all these skills.
00:33:55,000 --> 00:34:04,000
I hadn't actually used myself that I was being encouraged to use.
00:34:04,000 --> 00:34:12,000
It has been very useful for me. I think that that's been, you know,
00:34:12,000 --> 00:34:19,000
the greatest part and obviously being part of something which I'm quite passionate about and turning off with others as well.
00:34:19,000 --> 00:34:23,000
You are passionate about, about ethics in different ways.
00:34:23,000 --> 00:34:28,000
So, yeah, it's been I've I thoroughly enjoyed it.
00:34:28,000 --> 00:34:32,000
Thank you, Victoria, for taking the time to talk to me about all things.
00:34:32,000 --> 00:34:38,000
Conferences. If you're interested in finding out more about the research ethics conference that Victoria and I are on the committee for,
00:34:38,000 --> 00:34:42,000
I'm going to add a link to the conference website in the show notes.
00:34:42,000 --> 00:34:47,000
But I hope that even though our conversation has been quite specific to this project we're involved in,
00:34:47,000 --> 00:34:55,000
it's inspired you to to take the plunge and to attend your first conference or submit your first abstract.
00:34:55,000 --> 00:35:00,000
And that's it for this episode. Don't forget to like, rate and subscribe and join me.
00:35:00,000 --> 00:35:27,526
Next time we'll be talking to somebody else about researchers development and everything in between.
From researcher to Youtuber to author - an interview with Simon Clark
Being a neurodiverse PGR
Dealing with failure
Tales of major corrections
Tales of minor corrections
Researcher Takeover - Talking about Thematic Analysis
All about burn out
Being a Mature PGR
Being an internal (viva) examiner with Professor Michelle Bolduc
Preparing for your (HASS) Viva
Preparing for your (STEMM) Viva
Mentoring and Coaching with Dr. Kay Guccione
Taking a break take 2 - with Dr. Edward Mills
Doing non-traditional research with Lizzie Hobson
Changing supervisors with Maria Dede
Adapting research projects due to COVID-19 with Léna Prouchet
Working with an industry partner with Léna Prouchet
The Supervisory Relationship (from both sides!) with Edward Mills and Tom Hinton
Preparing for your upgrade
Copyright © 2006-2022 Podbean.com