Regarding Tony’s theory yesterday on Bryan Kohberger committing the murders in order to get attention from females in jail, it’s important to note there’s no record of him replying to the disturbingly many love letters he has gotten while doing time, so I doubt this was his main motive, but I love how he’s thinking outside the box. Anything is feasible in the chaotic mind of Bryan Kohberger.

Seriously? A dozen chumba commercials? UNFOLLOW.

...or Waters is a equal coward as well??

Spot on There’s no Common Sense on this & Other Crimes being Committed Today

That’s correct Special Needs kids cannot be With Regular Kids to Disruptive & Dangerous

The No Child left behind has Created these Messes

In this episode you had a man on named Robin Drake. He seems to be some sort of FBI specialist. He was speaking about the times that Mr coburger was pulled over on the way home with his father. He said that pulling them over was a good job whether or not it was coordinated or not. That’s funny to do a good job that you didn’t do on purpose. But I’m struck by the fact that Mr Drake never specified why he thought they would pull someone over while they’re under that level of suspicion.

I realized that the rules of podcasting are not the same as journalism. So you giving your opinion about these people and this man are perfectly okay, even though it makes me uncomfortable. But dude, the commercial breaks are longer than the actual podcast, in some cases. Like this one. All commercial and almost no content. And who wants to listen to this man have a conversation about things that have nothing to do with this case. His personal life does not interest me beyond the case.

P.S. I just realized I spelled your last name and in-correctly. Mea culpla.

My question to you Mr brewski is even though I find your informative. Especially when you have experts on to talk about psychological matters. So, please don’t get me wrong. I’m not hating on your podcast. I’m a listener. But I’m wondering why am I listening to this man talk to his son about going to law school. What does that have to do with the case at hand, which is over?

Why are all these podcasts so short. This one is supposed to be 7 minutes and 2 seconds long. But it begins with 2 minutes and 8 seconds of commercials. It is then, flanked by about 3 minutes of more commercials. That takes a potentially interesting podcast and turns into an aggravation. Plus, by playing your sponsors commercials back to back, you are ripping them off.

The way he gets so snappy at the 911 operators when they aren’t asking the “right” questions to match his script

Mr brueski. Or to whomever this may concern. I’ve been listening to this podcast since the beginning. I’ve listened to you be self-righteous and sanctimonious about position these people have put themselves in. You know the people you talk about on your podcast. But I wonder how you sleep at night knowing that you play the same commercial up to five or six times before and sometimes after your broadcast. You are robbing your sponsors. And you know it.

So I’m confused now cause there are people saying that’s not true. I mesmerized how do they know he didn’t

Can’t hear a word from episode 48 on

If the police search turns up no new evidence I could see this either being a hung Jury or not guilty based on the PCA. Cell phone tracking is a pseudoscience very inaccurate. Footage of his car is circumstantial but with the cell phone tracking there’s no way of knowing it’s him. The witness is unreliable she was under the influence of drugs and or alcohol and it’s dark with a mask. And as he points out in the show Touch DNA leaves room for reasonable doubt.

good coverage

He was probably fishing for information on what the cops knew or what they were doing when he brought up the shooting. He probably thought by bringing that up, it would be less suspicious that he was actually fishing, than to talk about the actual incident.

The s is a Good Podcast 🤗

They Should be Informing the Parents, As they are not it sounds like a coverup