Is this podcast still active? Hasn’t had a episode drop in 3 weeks

J

. G

Poor audio in this episode

Goldsborough Hall and Harewood House

You seem to be assuming everything they say is true. I think you need to re think this a little in the context everything they said might have been exaggerated.

They probably just want to take over the throne

You two are smearing the Duchess. Meghan borrowed earrings from the royal jeweler. Wht did the royal jeweler give her jewels from the Saudis. The times is not a reputable newspaper. A reputable paper should be balanced and get comment from all parties in question.

Also....please how old were Caroline and John Kennedy when their father was brutally shot...how many times did they have to totally relive it? Books, Videos, movies, News Specials! Many children have lost a parent.

Harry and Meghan are nothing but spoiled, whining, attention seeking brats.

I watched the 1969 documentary. It reminds very much of the documentary Elizabeth R. Both show the bagpipers, giving gifts to Head of States, the children/grandchildren. Both are very interesting.

They clearly didn’t want the UK media or palace aides/courtiers telling them when they were obligated to allow access to Archie. They didn’t want their consent as parents taken from them. They didn’t want to make deals with the media that would force them to allow access in exchange for favorable coverage from the media. They didn’t want their child used that way. Lastly, in the US, they won’t have to deal with palace staff leaking information about Archie.

two weeks now. That’s not because of a child voice. That is not profiting commercially from their child. Their contract with Spotify is already signed and sealed. The only people who are raising this as an issue are trolls and tabloids. The tabloids mainly because they want to profit off access to Archie. Archie was seen twice and heard once in 2020. Hardly the actions of parents looking to use their child. In a few months time the complaints will be back to why hasn’t he been seen.

had been bought and paid for. That won’t happen in the US. The Cambridge’s trot their kids our for PR. They planted cameras and microphones in Kate garden as a means to promote it before the garden opened to the public. Archie said 4 words at the end of the podcast and it was a complete surprise. Did it get a lot of attention. Yes. But the podcast has been trending around the world for

Ann claims there no difference between the privacy Archie could have in the US vs the U.K. That’s ridiculous. In the US, no one is going to demand that Meghan stand on the steps of a hospital. In the US, no one I going to claim they have a right to see Archie because of the sovereign grant. Harry and Meghan were demonized because they wanted to have 2 days with their baby before presenting him to the world. People in the U.K. media talked about Archie like he was a piece of property that had

No mention of Archewell’s partnership with World Central Kitchen. You praise the Cambridge’s for what they may achieve with Earthshot and Earlyyears but don’t mention tangible impact the Sussexes will have immediately. I would be fine with the microanalysis of the Sussexes if you engages in the same for other royals particularly the Cambridge’s since they are often compared to each other in order to criticize the Sussexes.

If you don’t understand the difference between parents choosing to share small moments and tabloids sending drones over your house or photographer using long lenses or people demanding you stand on the steps of a hospital after giving birth and saying they have a right to your baby you’re being deliberately obtuse. Privacy has to do with consent. By your logic the paparazzi have the right to photograph the Cambridge children because they have trotted them out for their projects increasingly.

Thank you for a great year w Podsave. You helped make 2020 more bearable and uplifting.

Do you ever ask yourselves why there is such a divergence of opinion between the U.K. media and the rest of the world. Sure you can pull out certain negatives from elsewhere but the reality is the vast majority of people respond positively to them. Company/brands want to work with them even after all the smearing. More and more it’s the overreaction of the U.K. media that is being examined. Does that ever make you question your bias or are you convinced that other people just don’t understand.

No is confused about them signing with Netflix and Spotify except for trolls trying to create a conflict. When the deals were announced it specified what the content would be. And Netflix announced that the deal was not exclusive. Lastly, using Piers Morgan as a example taints your opinions. His obvious bias is so vicious the fact that you would bring him up calls into question your own objectivity.