A jury says Meta and Google hurt a kid. What now?

Today, we’re talking about the landmark social media addiction trials that just resulted in two major verdicts against Big Tech — one in California against Meta and Google, and another in New Mexico against just Meta.

These are complicated cases with some huge repercussions for both how these platforms work and the very nature of speech in America. So we’ve brought on two heavy hitters: my friend Casey Newton, founder and editor of Platformer and co-host of Hard Fork, as well as Verge senior policy reporter Lauren Feiner, who’s been covering these trials since the beginning. 

Links: 

• Meta & YouTube found negligent in social media addiction trial | The Verge
• Meta misled users about its products’ safety, jury decides | The Verge
• Meta’s legal defeat: a victory for kids, or a loss for everyone | The Verge
• Can you have child safety and Section 230, too? | Platformer
• The terrible cost of infinite scroll | The New York Times
• I watched grieving parents stare down Zuckerberg in court | The Verge
• Section 230 turns 30 as it faces its biggest tests yet | The Verge
• Congress considers blowing up internet law | The Verge
• Sen. Rob Wyden: “Why the internet still needs Section 230” | The Verge
• How America turned against the First Amendment | The Verge

Subscribe to The Verge to access the ad-free version of Decoder!

Credits:

Decoder is a production of The Verge and part of the Vox Media Podcast Network.

Decoder is produced by Kate Cox and Nick Statt and edited by Ursa Wright. Our editorial director is Kevin McShane. 

The Decoder music is by Breakmaster Cylinder.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices