Press Freedom vs. Privacy—Newsworthiness in a Self-Publishing Era (Part 2)
An interview with Prof. Amy Gajda
The First Amendment provides broad but not absolute freedom of press protections. Louis Brandeis and Samuel Warren first famously articulated the right to privacy in 1890, a “right to be let alone” from undue prying by the press in private matters. While historically the press has enjoyed considerable latitude in determining what is newsworthy and publishable, there have been recent movements in the courts to constrict press freedoms and broaden individual privacy rights. Professor Amy Gajda of Tulane Law School examines how the concept of newsworthiness has evolved and what happens to press freedoms when “quasi-journalists,” self-publishers, bloggers and the like who don’t abide by traditional ethics codes overstep the editorial line.
(Credits: 0.5 General MCLE)
Deadly Force as Self Defense
Injustice by Forensics
Weaponization of Outer Space
A Mindful Lawyer – Combatting Lawyer Stress
War Crimes – Israel & Gaza
Model Minority & Associates
Dying Without a Will
SFFA v. Harvard
Why Law Firms Implode
Police Commands & Police Coercion
Inside the Shadow Docket
Economic Incentives for Diversity
Lady Justice
Regulating Crypto after FTX
God & Football after Bremerton
Recusal & the Bounds of Judicial Bias
WV v. EPA & the Major Questions Doctrine
Driverless Cars—A Shift in Risk
Gun Law after Bruen
Surrogates, Donors, & Same Sex Parental Rights
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
City Manager Unfiltered
Potencial Americano
The ASIC Podcast
The Chris Plante Show
Strict Scrutiny