Originalism is a way of interpreting the Constitution that could help it be understood through either framer’s intent or what the public would’ve intended at the Constitution’s ratification. Supporters say the Constitution needs modern interpretation, even if some pre-existing circumstances are nonexistent. Others argue it doesn’t make sense to keep our laws limited to what society back then would’ve valued.
In this context, we debate: Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?
Arguing Yes: Randy Barnett
Arguing No: Prof. Thomas Colby
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
MOCK TRIAL: Should the Courts Restrict Access to the Abortion Pill?
Should Elite Universities Reinstate the SAT?
Is Free Speech Threatened on Campus?
Ban the Box: Should We Banish the Criminal History Check Box from Job Applications?
Should Congress Stop Funding the War in Ukraine?
Is Religion a Force for Good?
Childhood Obesity Guidelines: Good Medicine or Too Extreme?
Should the US Ban Tik Tok?
Does Taylor Swift Deserve Her Billion Dollar Fortune?
Should We Address the Gender Wage Gap?
Has Citizens United Undermined Democracy?
Debate: Coleman Hughes and Jamelle Bouie on Color Blindness for Black History Month
Unresolved: The Iran Threat
How to Resolve Conflict in Relationships: A Conversation with Esther Perel
Is the Republican Party’s Refusal to Raise Taxes Fiscally Irresponsible?
Is Engineering Solar Radiation A Crazy Idea?
Is the American Dream in Decline?
David Petraeus and Andrew Roberts on Conflict, War, and Debate
Mock Trial: Is Trump Guilty in the January 6th Case?
David Brooks on the Art of Seeing and Hearing Others
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Meaningful Life with Andrew G. Marshall
The No-Frills Teacher Podcast
Heal, Survive & Thrive!
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast