This month, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers closes the comment period on its draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Dakota Access Pipeline, a 1,172-mile pipeline that’s been pumping 500,000 barrels of oil per day since May 2017.
The pipeline runs from the Bakken oil fields in North Dakota to southern Illinois, crossing the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers. Over the past six years, every court in the country has ruled that the Army Corps of Engineers did not study the pipeline’s environmental impact closely enough before approving the pipeline’s route. The Standing Rock Sioux tribe has maintained all along that the project poses a serious threat to its drinking water. From April 2016 to February 2017 thousands of water protectors from all over the country (and beyond) joined them in protests and direct actions. The resistance at Standing Rock is often cited by the fossil fuel industry, police and politicians as the reason states need new anti-protest laws, while the backlash to that resistance is often cited by water protectors as the reason for PTSD, asthma, and in some cases lost eyes and limbs.
Now, the Army Corps of Engineers says that removing the pipeline would be too damaging to the Missouri River and its surrounding ecosystems. The removal actions it describes in its EIS are the same actions taken to install the pipeline in the first place. The Army Corps suggests that removing the pipeline would be more environmentally harmful than allowing the oil to continue pumping under one of Standing Rock's primary drinking water sources. Nonetheless, this report—seven years late—represents one of the few pathways left to stop the pipeline.
The Standing Rock Sioux tribe is advocating to seal the pipeline off, while some water protectors are advocating for the pipeline to be removed entirely. The public comment period closes Dec 13, 2023.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
The Coordinated Attack on Shareholder Activism
Climate News Update: The New Carbon Majors + Swiss Elders Win Landmark Climate Case
Sainte-Soline, the Government Effort to Disband a Movement in France, and the Radical Solidarity of the Earth Uprisings
The U.S. Anti-Renewables Movement, Explained
Nearly 30 Years After the Ogoni 9 Tragedy, Nigerians Are Still Resisting Oil Colonialism
What Ecuador's Yasuní Referendum Really Means for Oil, in Yasuní and Beyond
Introducing: Hazard NYC
Dana R. Fisher on the Past, Present and Future of Climate Protest
Department of Homeland Security, the Manufactured "EcoTerrorist" Panic, and Cop City
Meet the UN's First Special Rapporteur on Environmental Defenders
How UK Courts Became the New Climate Protest Battleground
What Happened At Bayou Bridge? The Other End of the Dakota Access Pipeline
Modern-Day Bead Trading: The Fossil Fuel Industry Meets Indigenous Protest with "Redwashing" and Repression in Canada
Abeer Butmeh: Living on the Front Lines of a War and the Climate Crisis, in Palestine
Messy Conversations: Magatte Wade, Atlas Network's Center for African Prosperity
The Tomato Soup "Controversy"
In Brazil, A Tale as Old as Colonization: Why Indigenous Land Defenders Are Particularly Targeted by Extractive Industries
The Same Australian Think Tanks That Have Pushed Against Climate Policy for Years Say No to Indigenous Rights
Guyana Update: Gas to Energy for Guyana, or Problem to Profit for Exxon?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Spill
The Fifty One
The View from Somewhere
Inherited
Sound Off with Katy Henriksen