When the justices heard oral arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the landmark abortion case, one word came up more than any other: viability. The viability line was at the core of Roe v. Wade, and it’s been entrenched in the abortion rights movement ever since. But no one seems to remember how this idea made its way into the abortion debate in the first place. This week on More Perfect, we trace it back to the source and discover how a clerk and a couple of judges turned a fuzzy medical concept into a hard legal line.
Voices in the episode include:
• George Frampton — former clerk to Justice Harry Blackmun
• Judge Jon Newman — Second Circuit Court of Appeals
• Khiara Bridges — UC Berkeley School of Law professor
• Alex J. Harris — lawyer, former member of the Joshua Generation
Learn more:
• 1973: Roe v. Wade
• 2022: Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
Supreme Court archival audio comes from Oyez®, a free law project by Justia and the Legal Information Institute of Cornell Law School.
Support for More Perfect is provided in part by The Smart Family Fund.
Follow us on Instagram and Facebook @moreperfectpodcast, and Twitter @moreperfect.
Andy Warhol and the Art of Judging Art
The Original Anti-Vaxxer
Not Even Past: Dred Scott Reprise
No More Souters
Off the Record, On the Stand
Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl Reprise
Part 2: If Not Viability, Then What?
The Political Thicket Reprise
The Court’s Reporters
Clarence X
The Supreme Court v. Peyote
The Preamble: Introducing More Perfect Season 4
More Perfect Is Coming Back
The Unfinished Amendments with Kevin Devine
The Democracy Amendments with Stef Chura
The Power Player Amendments with Devendra Banhart
The Sleeper Amendments with Post Animal
The Reconstruction Amendments with Kash Doll
The 19th Amendment with Dolly Parton
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Radiolab
Freakonomics Radio
Snap Judgment
Death, Sex & Money
Note to Self