In this Episode, Andrea and Sean discuss the report from AAPM TG-218, “Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA.” They review some of the TG Report, the report recommendations, and the background of IMRT QA. The hosts share their thoughts and experiences on the IMRT QA process and its impact on clinical outcomes.
Have any questions or comments? Talk to us at https://www.reddit.com/r/HormesisPodcast/comments/cgsys3/episode_3_the_definition_of_insanityand_tg218/
Miften et al. “Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: Recommendations of AAPM TG-218.” Med Phys. 45(4). 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12810]
Low et al. “Dosimetry tools and techniques for IMRT.” Med Phys. 38(3). 2011. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3514120]
Ezzel et al. “IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparison, a report of AAPM TG-119.” Med Phys. 36(11). 2009. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3238104]
Nelms et al. “Per-beam, planar IMRT QA passing rates do not predict clinically relevant patient dose errors.” Med Phys. 38(2). 2011. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3544657]
Hormesis Podcast: The Lost Episode
Micro Dose δ - ABR OLA
Hormesis Podcast #7 - Big Data: Headbutt your way into medicine...
Hormesis Podcast #6 - IT in Medicine; Turn it off and on again...
Micro Dose ɣ - ACR Site Reviews
Micro Dose β - ABR Part 3
Hormesis Podcast #5 - True Grit - A Recounting of the Radium Girls
Micro Dose α - AAPM Annual Meeting 2019
Hormesis Podcast #4 - Radiomics: How to (maybe) classify your future
Hormesis Podcast #2 - Medical Physics 3.0
Hormesis Podcast #1 - End of the medical physics residency crunch?
Introduction to the Hormesis Podcast
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
A Taste of TEDTalks
PragerU
The History of the Ottoman Empire
I BELIEVE
THED Talks