Going into the NATO summit at Vilnius, NATO had a three tier membership structure and lacked the political leadership and will to make hard decisions. There are some good examples of things going well at the tactical, military end (the CDCM systems in the Baltic that make that region one with a compelling A2AD challenge for Russia, for example) but behind the veneer of platitudes and handshakes, the Alliance looks less solid. Indeed, as described by Professor Julian Lindley-French, it has become an ‘anything-but-war’ grouping of states, full of pretence and appeasement. In this discussion we cover the underlying issues with the Alliance and are left wondering whether today’s NATO leaders have the courage to get out of the Potemkin village they have sleep walked into.
NATO isn’t perfect (but it isn’t going badly either)
A Cautionary Tale from 1973
Norms and Forms of Warfare
AUKUS – a reality check
Future War, Technology and Strategy
Balancing and regional players
Fortification
DPRK in an era of Great Power realignment
On Taiwan – strategic ambiguity, operational clarity?
Investing in a War Zone
Ending wars - a primer
What if the deep battle doesn’t matter?
Manoeuvre theory is in a coma
Is manœuvre a myth?
Japan Security Dilemmas
A Middle East Without America
China’s Machiavellian Mindset
Fiscal Reality and Strategic Autonomy
A Russian Lake no more?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
City Manager Unfiltered
Potencial Americano
The ASIC Podcast
The Chris Plante Show
Strict Scrutiny