Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts
News:News Commentary
This episode is a part of Opinionpalooza. Slate’s coverage of Supreme Court decisions. Thank you to our Slate Plus members for making this episode available to all listeners. The full version of this episode is now exclusively available to our Slate Plus members. If you want to have access to bonus content like this, go to slate.com/amicusplus to become a member.
In deciding against the bonkers (technical legal term) “Independent State Legislature Theory” in Moore v Harper, the Supreme Court chose not to take a wrecking ball to American democracy. Judge Michael Luttig, a counsel of record in the case, is relieved but not surprised. In this emergency episode of Amicus, Judge Luttig tells Dahlia Lithwick that Tuesday’s decision may have big repercussions at the Department of Justice, in Jack Smith’s investigation of former President Trump’s role in January 6th.
Sign up for Slate Plus now to support our show.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Will the Supreme Court Step Into Trump’s Hush Money Conviction?
Opinionpalooza: The Court of King Alito
SPECIAL: Trump Guilty on All 34 Counts
Opinionpalooza: A Bad June Rising At SCOTUS
Opinionpalooza: Justice Alito Flies the Flag for Racial Gerrymanders (Preview)
How Originalism Ate The Law: What We Can Do About It
Alito’s Stars and Gripes
How Originalism Ate The Law: The Trap
How Originalism Ate the Law: The Trick
Democracy Dies at SCOTUS
PREVIEW: Abortion Gaslighting is Back at SCOTUS
Twelve Jurors and One Angry Ex-President
The Jurisprudence of Bleeding Out
When Gag Orders Become Campaign-Performance Indicators
When RAGA Rhymes with MAGA
How The Mifepristone Case Reached SCOTUS
Who Gets to Lie Online?
The Lies Destroying America
Yes, You Can Vote for an Insurrectionist
The IVF Decision We Should Have Seen Coming
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Strict Scrutiny
The Lawfare Podcast
Deep State Radio
Consider This from NPR
Today, Explained