When Svechen and Hamley were writing about the operational level of war, it is doubtful they envisaged the number of staff and headquarters that would result from their musings. Their reason to exist is often purported to be scale, complexity, or pace in war today but this might all be just hype from academics and their acolytes. Remove the operational level staffs and processes, says Wilf Owen, and militaries can become leaner, smarter and less bureaucratic. He might just have a point.
NATO isn’t perfect (but it isn’t going badly either)
A Cautionary Tale from 1973
Norms and Forms of Warfare
AUKUS – a reality check
Future War, Technology and Strategy
Balancing and regional players
Fortification
DPRK in an era of Great Power realignment
On Taiwan – strategic ambiguity, operational clarity?
Investing in a War Zone
Ending wars - a primer
What if the deep battle doesn’t matter?
Manoeuvre theory is in a coma
Is manœuvre a myth?
NATO structural issues unresolved at Vilnius
Japan Security Dilemmas
A Middle East Without America
China’s Machiavellian Mindset
Fiscal Reality and Strategic Autonomy
A Russian Lake no more?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
City Manager Unfiltered
Potencial Americano
The ASIC Podcast
The Chris Plante Show
Red Eye Radio