What should we think when an academic Humanities journal unsuspectingly publishes a paper that's been written as a hoax, full of fashionable jargon and deliberately specious arguments? Does this demonstrate that the Humanities set a higher value on shallow intellectual trends than on rigorous scholarship - or is there something more nuanced and complicated going on?
Women philosophers in 19th century Germany
Neofeudalism: techno-lords and peasants
Obedience
Style wars pt 1: Postwar France and a new philosophical mode
The predicament of existence
Mary Midgley, public philosophy and plumbing
Intellectual humility
Freedom or liberty?
Philosophy, angst and hope
Music, taste and AI
The philosophy of twins
Philosophy, disability and the gut
Pornography and free speech
What are Australian philosophers thinking?
Queer vs the state
What is swearing?
Friendship
Transgender identity and experience
Gender, gaming and pop culture
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Modern West
강유원의 책담화冊談話
The Art of Manliness
Dear Hank & John
Conversations With Coleman
Alan Watts Being in the Way