Mad in America: Rethinking Mental Health
Health & Fitness:Mental Health
This week on MIA Radio, we interview Professor Jim van Os. Professor van Os is Chairman of the Division of Neuroscience at Utrecht University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands, and Visiting Professor of Psychiatric Epidemiology at King’s College, Institute of Psychiatry in London. He trained in Psychiatry in Casablanca, Bordeaux and the Institute of Psychiatry and the Maudsley Royal Hospital in London.
We last spoke with Jim for the podcast in August 2017 and this time we focus on a recent paper written by Jim and co-authors that was published in the journal World Psychiatry in January 2019. The paper is entitled ‘The diagnosis evidence-based group-level symptom-reduction model as organizing principle for mental health care. Time for change?‘
In this episode we discuss: What the diagnosis evidence-based group-level symptom-reduction model is and how it currently informs mainstream mental healthcare. How mental health funding and mental health professional partners work together to monitor and assess the effects of current evidence-based interventions. How this curative medical model is attractive, but often fails to work for patients. That the focus on biological, brain-based diseases and symptoms conflicts with the experience of people who are attempting to develop a narrative view of their difficulties and suffering. That the paper is an attempt to start a discussion about building a synthesis between the diagnosis, symptom-based medical world and the lived experience of individual people. How the creation of specific and discrete diagnoses has reinforced the symptom-led approach to mental health and has also necessitated the stratification of doctors into silos of expertise. How Jim favors a spectrum-based approach over a fixed diagnosis and that an example is autism spectrum disorder as described in DSM V. The limitations of using ‘target symptom reduction’ as an outcome measure for mental health. That symptom reduction can be beneficial in the short-term but is not a good long-term measure of recovery. That the paper attempts to make clear how important individual experiences are and the need to be sensitive to the existential domain, saying “restoration of health is not the goal, it is the means to enable a person to find and pursue meaningful goals, accordingly, the person’s existential values become central”. That the evidence suggests that any treatment effect or improvement is often down to meaningful interaction rather than the specific expertise of the treating professional. That, in many countries, we still see a huge gulf between mental healthcare and social care which remain separate and remote from each other and that this separation is not how the person experiences their world. The importance of including lived experience in the evidence base, particularly because randomized controlled trials, considered the gold standard of evidence, are often not conclusive in the field of mental health. That, in mental health, evidence shows that 30% to 40% of the response is down to placebo and the expectation of being helped. That the desire is to make the existential domain the primary lens through which to view human experience and to respond to mental or emotional suffering. That, arguably, ‘love is the most powerful evidence-based treatment in mental health’.Relevant links:
Professor Jim van Os
The evidence-based group-level symptom-reduction model as the organizing principle for mental health care: time for change?
Tedx: Maastricht, Connecting to Madness
ISPS Liverpool Conference Jim Van Os Keynote Address
Schizophrenia does not exist
© Mad in America 2019
Leaving Biological Psychiatry Behind - An Interview With Rodrigo Nardi
Context and Care vs Isolate and Control - An Interview with Arthur Kleinman
Undisclosed Financial Conflicts of Interest in the DSM-5: An interview with Lisa Cosgrove and Brian Piper
Deprescribing Psychiatric Drugs to Reduce Harms and Empower Patients - Swapnil Gupta
Is Madness an Evolved Signal? – Justin Garson on Strategy Versus Dysfunction
'It Was a Joint Effort'- Deborah Kasdan on Bringing Her Late Sister's Story to Life
What if Much of What you Thought you Knew About Mental Health was up for Debate?
The Psychological Humanities Manifesto: An Interview with Mark Freeman
Robert Whitaker Answers Reader Questions on Pharma Marketing and Psychiatric Drugs
Robert Whitaker Answers Reader Questions on Mad in America, the Biopsychosocial Model, and Psychiatric History
The Making of a 'Madness' That Hides Our Monsters - An Interview with Audrey Clare Farley
A Playground for Predators-Diane Dimond on The Abuses of Guardianship
May Cause Side Effects–Radical Acceptance and Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal: An Interview with Brooke Siem
Branding Diseases: Ray Moynihan on How Drug Companies Market Psychiatric Conditions
How Mad Studies and the Psychological Humanities are Changing Mental Health: An Interview with Narrative Psychiatrist Bradley Lewis
Embracing the Shadow—Charlie Morley on Lucid Dreaming as Therapy
Family Panel Discussion – Supporting a Child, Teen, or Young Person in Crisis
Sacred Conversations: A Talk with Susan Swim and a Father Whose Daughter Found Healing
The Radical Politics of Madness-Micha Frazer-Carroll
Can Psychosocial Disability Decolonize Mental Health? A Conversation with Luis Arroyo and Justin Karter
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Mental Health Insights
MQ Open Mind
Speaking of Suicide
The Suicide Prevention Movement
Depression Talks Podcast