In this episode of Elucidations, Matt sits down with Emily Dupree to learn about whether it’s rational or irrational to try to seek revenge.
As a culture, we kind can’t decide what we think about revenge. Out of one side of our mouths, we talk a big game about letting bygones be bygones, about how revenge and retaliation lead to cycles of violence, and about how nothing good can really come of getting back at people. But acts of revenge, where clearly warranted, also have a visceral moral appeal that it would be absurd to deny. If we didn’t think there were at least some situations in which a person ought to get their comeuppance, then there wouldn’t be so many heroic adventure movies centered around the protagonist’s quest for revenge. When the hero gets back at the villain, it just feels right, like the movie needs to end here and we can all go home; and no amount of pedantic, post-hoc reasoning can ever make that feeling go away.
Solving that dilemma is hard, but as a way of working up to it, our distinguished guest decides to tackle a slightly different question. Not: can seeking revenge ever be the right thing to do—but: can seeking revenge ever be a rational thing to do. Traditionally, most philosophers have answered that question in the negative. Calling it irrational means that it’s senseless and unintelligible, like anyone who does it is undergoing a (possibly temporary) lapse in their basic mental faculties. The reason most philosophers think that it’s irrational to take revenge is that there’s no way to undo the wrong that was done to you in the past. If Person A did something truly horrible to Person B, that thing doesn’t get undone when Person B does a new horrible thing to Person A. And if that’s the case, why do it? Doing it is all cost and no benefit.
In this episode, Emily Dupree argues that in fact, it can be rational to take revenge. How come? It isn’t all cost and no benefit, because in some cases, successfully taking revenge can lead to a unique benefit: namely, the restoration of the vengeance seeker’s moral personhood. For the unique benefit to come, certain background conditions have to hold: the original harm has to have been genuinely morally wrong, it has to have been as egregious as it can be (so it can’t be minor/inconsequential), it has to have taken place under conditions of the political state failing, and it has to have undermined the vengeance seeker’s moral personhood. In that case, it is possible for an act of vengeance to be intelligible as an attempt on the part of the vengeance seeker to get their moral personhood back. Note that our guest isn’t saying the vengeance seeker is right to seek vengeance in these circumstances. The view is just that seeking vengeance under these circumstances can be comprehensible, rather than just bonkers.
Tune in to hear our guest discuss some historical examples of revenge that we can comprehend!
Matt Teichman
See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Episode 149: Lainie Ross and Christos Lazaridis talk about defining death
Episode 148: Christos Lazaridis discusses brain death
Episode 147: Gabriella Gonzalez discusses the intersection of algebra and programming
Episode 146: Gaurav Venkataraman discusses memory in DNA and RNA
Episode 145: Andrew Sepielli discusses quietism and metaethics
Episode 144: Christopher Beem discusses democratic virtues
Episode 143: Mark Linsenmayer discusses alternative models of education
Episode 141: Rob Goodman discusses eloquence
Episode 140: Meghan Sullivan and Paul Blaschko discuss the good life
Episode 139: Jessica Tizzard discusses the philosophy of pregnancy
Episode 138: Toby Buckle discusses Mill's liberty principle
Episode 137: Bryan Caplan discusses open borders
Episode 136: Christian Miller discusses virtue and character
Episode 135: Sara Protasi discusses the philosophy of envy
Episode 134: Claire Kirwin discusses value realism
Episode 133: Aristotle discusses his philosophy
Episode 132: Rebecca Valentine discusses queer hackerspaces
Episode 131: Greg Salmieri discusses egoism and altruism
Episode 130: Jessica Tizzard discusses weakness of the will
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Modern West
The University of Chicago Law School Faculty Podcast
University of Chicago Human Rights Program Distinguished Lecturer Series
The Latin American Briefing Series
CHIASMOS: The University of Chicago International and Area Studies Multimedia Outreach Source [audio]
University of Chicago Booth School of Business Podcast Series