Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts
News:News Commentary
Oral arguments at the Supreme Court Thursday in Trump v. Anderson revealed a lot about some of the justices’ commitment to the primacy of originalism. Noah Bookbinder, president of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, joins Dahlia Lithwick to discuss why his organization took up and pursued the long shot case to try to keep former President Donald J Trump off the ballot in Colorado. While the Supreme Court appeared to have little appetite for taking the big swing to find that Trump had disqualified himself from office when he engaged in an insurrection, Noah insists the case is far from having been in vain - eloquently highlighting the dangerous potential consequences of inaction. It's a chilling reminder of what’s at stake.
Next, Dahlia is joined by slate senior writer Mark Joseph Stern to discuss whether the liberal justices have some grand bargain in mind as they offered multiple off-ramps for Trump’s side, despite dozens of bipartisan briefs arguing for Trump to be kept off the ballot, the court’s originalist’s sudden concern for consequences in this case, when they have had no interest in weighing the life and death consequences for ordinary people in cases concerning guns and abortion. Finally, they tackle a worrying undercurrent to Thursday’s arguments: an apparent capitulation to threats of chaos and violence as a basis for deciding constitutional cases.
In our Slate Plus segment, Mark sticks around to discuss a landmark gun decision out of the Hawaii Supreme Court, and why it’s a problem that DOJ’s special counsel, Robert Hur, issued a report declining to prosecute, but affirming that Joe Biden is old (hint: the problem isn’t that he’s old).
Sign up for Slate Plus now to listen and support our show.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
SPECIAL: Trump Guilty on All 34 Counts
Opinionpalooza: A Bad June Rising At SCOTUS
Opinionpalooza: Justice Alito Flies the Flag for Racial Gerrymanders (Preview)
How Originalism Ate The Law: What We Can Do About It
Alito’s Stars and Gripes
How Originalism Ate The Law: The Trap
How Originalism Ate the Law: The Trick
Democracy Dies at SCOTUS
PREVIEW: Abortion Gaslighting is Back at SCOTUS
Twelve Jurors and One Angry Ex-President
The Jurisprudence of Bleeding Out
When Gag Orders Become Campaign-Performance Indicators
When RAGA Rhymes with MAGA
How The Mifepristone Case Reached SCOTUS
Who Gets to Lie Online?
The Lies Destroying America
Yes, You Can Vote for an Insurrectionist
The IVF Decision We Should Have Seen Coming
A Series of Lawsuits That We Call an Election
Fani Willis and a Tale of Two Ethics Violations
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
It’s Complicated
On with Kara Swisher
The Daily Show: Ears Edition
The Last Word with Lawrence O’Donnell
Alex Wagner Tonight