Lady Justice is often depicted wearing a blindfold, signifying that judges are neutral arbiters of the law. Unfortunately, thanks for a judicial doctrine known as Chevron deference, the Supreme Court has required judges to peek from behind that metaphorical blindfold and put a thumb on the scale for the most powerful litigant in our nation: the federal government. In a case called Brand X, the Court took Chevron deference to its logical conclusion, allowing agencies to overrule judicial decisions. One dissenter wrote that this was not only bizarre, but it was probably unconstitutional. That view has been picking up steam in the past decade. Next term, the Court will hear a case asking it to overturn Chevron deference.
Thanks for our guests Aditya Bamzai and Jeff Wall.
Follow us on Twitter @ehslattery @anastasia_esq @pacificlegal #DissedPod
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
A Ripsnorting Dissent
The Buck Stops with the President
Delegation Running Riot at SCOTUS
The Supreme Court and Indian Children
Korematsu and the Court of History
BONUS: Supreme Court Justice – DENIED!
Total Swine
BONUS: Who is Clarence Thomas?
Water, Water Everywhere
BONUS: A Live Supreme Court Preview
Six Trials, Seventy-Two Jurors, and One Supreme Court Dissent
BONUS: A Dog's Breakfast
Will the Real Tone Dougie Please Stand Down
BONUS: And Bingo Was His Name-o
Thurgood Marshall and the Machinery of Death
BONUS: Which Case Should SCOTUS Overturn?
License to Mildly Burn
Scalia/Ginsburg
Emergency Powers Kindle Emergencies
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
City Manager Unfiltered
Potencial Americano
The ASIC Podcast
The Chris Plante Show
Red Eye Radio