Arguments in the challenge to the abortion drug mifepristone suggest the Supreme Court will nix the dispute on technical standing grounds.
Justices from across the ideological spectrum suggested the anti-abortion doctors at the center of the case were asking too much.
Cases and Controversies hosts run through the lopsided arguments that focused little on the merits and almost exclusively on whether the doctors could prevent access to the drug nationwide.
They also discuss how the Supreme Court’s action—or inaction—means South Carolina can use an unconstitutional voting map in the upcoming election.
Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.
Official Act Is Sticking Point in Trump Immunity Claim
Idaho Abortion Ban Getting Supreme Court Review
US Supreme Court Considers Novel Charges Over Jan. 6
Homeless Dispute Getting Rare Supreme Court Hearing
Government Censorship Focus of Supreme Court Disputes
Supreme Court Urged to Take Up Fight Over Trans Youth
Divide Surfaces in Supreme Court Trump Ballot Ruling
Supreme Court Digs into Guns, Social Media, and Trump Immunity
Social Media Cases Could Impact Public Discourse Online
Supreme Court Weighs Next Steps on Trump Immunity Bid
Historic Trump Ballot Argument Explored Numerous Paths
High Court ‘Friends’ Urge Caution in Trump Ballot Case
Trump’s Supreme Court Case Raises Security Questions
With Chevron Doctrine Likely to Fall, What Comes Next?
Trump, Agency Power Fights Tee-Up Historic Court Term
No Fly, Property Rights Start Supreme Court New Year
Tense Exchanges, Big Supreme Court Argument Moments
Grants in Abortion, Jan. 6 Add to Momentous Term
O’Connor’s Trailblazing Career Marked By Grit, Charisma
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Masters in Business
Odd Lots
Bloomberg Surveillance
Bloomberg Businessweek
Prognosis: Losing it