Civil Action with Brian & Shant
Government
Cacho v. Eurostar
Defendant had facially non-compliant meal & rest break policies. The court concluded that the class cannot be certified because Plaintiff did not sufficiently illustrate a uniform policy of missed meal breaks. Individual questions predominated as to whether the plaintiff missed rest and meal breaks.
In Re Williams Sonoma
A Kentucky resident brought a consumer class action against Williams Sonoma. However, Kentucky does not provide a legal platform for consumer class actions. Trial court allowed Plaintiff’s Counsel to conduct discovery to identify a California resident to serve as class representative. Defendants took a writ which the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal granted. Court of appeal held that pre-certification discovery of the identity of class members is not permitted here, given Defendant’s privacy interests. As a result, without discovery to identify who the class representative might be, the case stalls.
Safeway Wage & Hour Cases
An appeal from a rare jury trial of a class action case regarding misclassification of assistant managers who were listed as exempt presumptively as a ploy to avoid protections from wage and hour guidelines. Jury found in favor of employer, and found that assistant managers were correctly classified as exempt. On appeal, Plaintiff argued that the Court gave improper instruction to the jury. Court of Appeal clarifies the rules regarding exempt work, but ultimately affirms the verdict.
Murphy v. SFBSC Management
The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's approval of a settlement notice process and a class action settlement, negotiated without a certified class, in a case arising out of a dispute under federal and California labor law regarding whether exotic dancers working at various nightclubs in San Francisco were misclassified as independent contractors rather than being treated as employees.
Episode 76: What Your Expert Witnesses Want You to Know
Episode 75: Tort Reform, Ron DeSantis, Remote Appearance, and AI
Episode 74: Starting Your Own Firm with Alexandra Steele Cooper.
Episode 73: Dr. Sohee Jun on Women and Imposter Syndrome in the Law
Episode 72: Court Reporter Crisis and Disney v. DeSantis
Episode 71: Working with Victims of Sexual Abuse
Episode 70: Annie Martin-McDonough Talks the Tort of Seduction
Episode 69: Gender Bias: A Conversation with Anastasia Mazzella and Marina Pacheco
Episode 68: Figuring Out Insurance Policy Limits In Your PI Case with Stephanie Charlin.
Episode 67: Can you pop the Lid On a UM/UIM Policy?
Episode 66: Sexual Abuse Case Filing Process for Statute 340.1
Episode 65: Why Corporate America Wants a Conservative Supreme Court.
Episode 64: PAGA - What just happened here?
63: Harry Plotkin Shares His Thoughts On the Significance of Proper Jury Selection to Win Cases.
62: The Future of Law School: A Conversation With Michael Waterstone, Dean of Loyola Law School, Los Angeles.
61: What a PI Lawyer Needs To Know About Family Law. A conversation with Ron Brot.
60: Is PAGA in Trouble?
59: Popping the Policy – Developments in Insurance Bad Faith Law
58. Civil Procedure Cases Pt. 4
57. Insurance Cases Pt. 2
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
City Manager Unfiltered
Potencial Americano
The ASIC Podcast
The Chris Plante Show
Red Eye Radio