LOCKDOWN DEBATE: In the past six months, citizens have had their right to protest quashed, their free speech attacked (with restrictions on social media about alternative public-health messages) and their ability to ‘mingle’ made illegal. In any other situation, this would be unthinkable. Does living under a virus mean having to sacrifice our civil liberties? Is it right to push back on the idea that anyone who questions new restrictions is a ‘covidiot’ or even unsympathetic to the seriousness of the virus? Should we be worried about the effects of asking citizens to ‘snitch’ on each other in an already atomised and isolated public sphere? And does the government’s rush to implement ever-tighter rules on social interaction set a dangerous precedent - especially if dealing with pandemics becomes part of the ‘new normal’? Silkie Carlo, Luke Gittos, Patrick O’Flynn, Ruth Smeeth and Claire Fox discuss.
All Academy of Ideas online events are free - if you are in a position to be able to donate, we’d greatly appreciate your support: http://www.academyofideas.org.uk/donate
Square-eyed screenagers: are phones corrupting our kids?
Disunited Kingdom: the rebirth of nations?
Is AI the end of art?
The politics of hate: is everyone a bigot but me?
Should we leave the European Convention on Human Rights?
Power play: who really rules today?
Why do comedians keep siding with the Establishment?
Podcast of Ideas: 24 February 2024
Reviving economies: Is the state a help or a hindrance?
Deifying diversity: a value for our times?
What would a Labour government look like?
Football fans, farmers and failed pledges - Podcast of Ideas
WhatsAppened to privacy?
Let's talk about race
Still in the race: understanding Trumpism
Extreme weather: can we adapt to a changing climate?
Podcast of Ideas: Rwanda, Rochdale and the Middle East
Still in the race: understanding Trumpism
Trust me, I’m your doctor: are GPs in crisis?
Jack Hues in conversation: Reflections of a Rock Star
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free