The panel is joined by our first guest-author, Associate Dean Bekah Saidman-Krauss! We discuss an article she wrote which analyzed a proposal by Senator Leahy (D-VT) to allow the Supreme Court to fill recusal based vacancies with retired Justices. The lower courts have mechanisms to replace a judge who recuses themselves, why doesn't the Supreme Court? What effect does not having a replacement mechanism have on their decision making?
The article discussed is: Bekah Saidman-Krauss, A Second Sitting: Assessing the Constitutionality and Desirability of Allowing Retired Supreme Court Justices to Fill Recusal-Based Vacancies on the Bench. 116 Penn St. L. Rev 253 (2011).
Guest: Bekah Saidman-Krauss
Host: Tony Fernando
Panel: Schenley Kent, Seth Trott, Jo Ann Fernando
Audio: Mohammed Saleem
Producer: Tony Fernando
Discrimination Protection for Volunteers
Eliminating Constitutional Law
Equity in Law School Admissions
Processes in Law School Which Affect Law Students and Lawyers
Civil Rights during the Covid Pandemic
The Limits of Limitariansim
Gallows Medicine
The Automated Administrative State
Emotional Support Animals and the Fair Housing Act (and other situations)
Shooting Fish (With Firearms)
Jurors and Social Media
E-sports, and the regulation thereof
Hot Coffee For Law Day
Fortnite, the NFL, Dancing, and Copyright
The Morality of Grading on a Curve
Snitches Get Stiches
Business Information and FOIA
Are abortions an essential medical service during a pandemic?
The Voting Rights Act after Shelby v. Holder
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Tucker Carlson Podcast
The Matt Walsh Show
The Glenn Beck Program
Mark Levin Podcast
The Michael Knowles Show