Habits 2 Goals: The Habit Factor® Podcast with Martin Grunburg

Habits 2 Goals: The Habit Factor® Podcast with Martin Grunburg

https://api.substack.com/feed/podcast/1260467.rss
182 Followers 633 Episodes Claim Ownership
WE ARE NOW LIVE ON SUBSTACK w/ H2G Premium Content! If you’ve ever struggled to achieve your goals you are not alone! The reason just might be because ALL prior goal achievement methods missed ONE key element— habit! That's right, The Habit Factor® (bestselling book and app) exposed a timeless truth that helped to launch an entirely new genre of productivity apps (habit trackers) and help thousands around the world achieve their goals faster! There’s a reason top coaches, consultants, traine...
View more

Episode List

🚨 The Habit Tracking Controversy (Yes, there was one...) is Finally Over. UBM Ended It.

Jan 9th, 2026 7:22 PM

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit habits2goals.substack.com/subscribe

What’s a Seminar?

Jan 2nd, 2026 1:21 PM

Happppppppppy New Year!!! 🎉Here’s to a safe, prosperous, and phenomenally clear 2026…a year full of growth, action, and gratitude.I’m deeply grateful for your readership, participation, and contributions.May the FORCE of UBM be with you! 🎉🍾🥂🎆Tony Robbins shares a story that he’s probably told a few thousand times.It’s his origin story.Same story. Over and over.You don’t get to write the bestseller and disappear.I used to think that was the case.Nope.You show up. Day after day. Again and again.And, you keep telling your story.Nobody records a podcast episode and vanishes.If your work really helps people, you keep showing up and producing.Over and over…500+ episodes later... here we are…So, yes, it used to kill me to tell my Catalina Classic (32-mile, open-ocean paddle) story over and over.Now I get it.It’s just part of the territory.I love Tony’s origin story… and it goes something like this…He’s seventeen-ish… late 70’sA friend of his father’s invites him to earn some extra money moving furniture over the weekend.Tony’s hustle— energy—stood out. So the guy invites him to lunch; mid-sandwich, Tony asks: “How did you become successful?”The guy pauses, smiles, and says, “Honestly? I went to a seminar.”Tony blinks. “What’s a seminar?”The man explains:A seminar is where someone who’s accomplished something—figured out a few things—gets on a stage and shares the very best lessons… He teaches things that will literally shave years of struggle off your life… all boiled down into about three hours.Tony exclaims, “Wow! That sounds amazing. Can you get me in?”The guy nods. “I probably could. But I won’t.”“…Wait—what?” Tony’s confused.Mentor-guy says, “Look, if I give it to you for free, you’re not going to value it.”Tony asks, “How much is it?”“It’s about forty bucks.”Tony stares. “That’s a week’s pay. No way!”The guy replies—without missing a beat: “Cool. Enjoy the next twenty years of struggle.”Tony scrapes the money together.Goes to the seminar.Ultimately, he becomes the speaker’s protégé—Jim Rohn, who at the time was selling his Adventures in Achievement course.Then, as they say in storybook land,THE REST IS HISTORY…Why Share That Story?I’m guessing you know.Behavior Architecture is the product of my twenty-plus years of struggle.The books: The Habit Factor, The Pressure Paradox, Everything is a Fcking Story.*Together, they laid the foundation.Now, they’ve given rise to something unprecedented:the first elemental, unified, goal-directed, and falsifiable model of behavior.Nearly six months after publication, every attempt by behavioral scientists as well as top LLM/AI has been unsuccessful.UBM stands. 1500 downloads later…. a scientific response/presentation to the field’s imperative for a unified framework.Done.------UBM has a single mission:To deliver the clearest, most practical, holistic framework to help anyone architect their habits, skills, goals, and life.Not just theory.Not just big ideas.But in practice—a scientifically validated, proven framework.Yes, proven.Let’s be clear:Nobody else in the world can say that. That’s not boasting. It’s science.Of course… YES! It’s backed by a 110% money-back guarantee.(Seriously. Full details on the site.)Here’s the funny thing...When there’s ZERO RISK, the real challenge reveals itself.It’s no longer about the course.It’s no longer about its value.It’s definitely not about the science.It’s about the MIRROR.Because if the program delivers—If it offers what one participant of FC-01 (Australian CEO) described in his review(let me see if I have this correct… ; )“UNBELIEVABLE VALUE”Then the question is rarely about the money.It’s about YOU.Are you ready to do the work?Behavior Architecture is the last behavior-change course you’ll need.Risk-free. Guaranteed.The Founders Cohort 01 (FC-01) experience was sooooo GOOOOOOOD….Here’s your special offer:The NEW YEAR, NEW SCIENCE, FINALLY, NEW YOU. 50% OFF enrollment!!Until January 7, 2026, or as available.That’s HALF-OFFPLUS, a 110% risk-free guarantee.See you on the inside!👇PROMO CODE: “NewScience”Grab your 50% OFF!New Year. 🎆New Science. 🔬New You. 💪🏽 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit habits2goals.substack.com/subscribe

Behavior Architecture

Dec 5th, 2025 4:14 PM

How the Unified Behavior Model Was Unearthed—and Why This Is Your Last Chance to Join the Founders CohortThe 8-Day intensive kicks off 12/11/25 on Maven.com.It’s designed to rapidly accelerate your understanding of UBM—and explode your effectiveness.✅ 110% Money-Back Guarantee🔒 Zero risk, high upside🕓 Only 4 days left—sign-up closes 12/9Learn more + enroll now:https://maven.com/thehabitfactor/behavior-architectureQuick exercise: Close your eyes and think back to where you were last December—physically, mentally, emotionally, socially, spiritually, financially, and professionally.Can you remember your vision? The goals you set? How did you hope 2025 would unfold?In short, you probably had a few goals. So… how did it go? How much progress did you make?10%? 25%? 0%?If you crushed it, congratulations!!Next week, Behavior Architecture – Founders Cohort kicks off!Already a handful of PROFESSIONAL COACHES are enrolled!That should tell you all you need to know.It’s their job to understand and teach behavior—to help their clients achieve their GOALS!Thus, New Year. New Science… New You?» SAVE an instant $200 » Behavior ArchitectureWhat is Behavior Architecture?Let’s begin with what it is NOT.It’s NOT hype.It’s NOT marketing.It’s A SCIENTIFIC framework that emerged from a 150-year behavioral science riddle.You can find out more and read it yourself. UnifiedBehaviorModel.comYour Excuses…“I don’t have the time.”That’s the opposite of architect mode.You’re locked inside tenant mode—trapped within your own Behavior Echo-System (BES) by your existing HABITS, unable to step back and proactively DESIGN and architect your behaviors and goals.To be fair, some people do have greater time commitments. That’s precisely why ~85% of the Behavior Architecture coursework is ASYNC. Meaning: you do it in your social media time, miscellaneous downtime, lunch breaks—your usual “lost time.”“I don’t have the money.”If this is a genuine issue, we’ve set aside a few scholarships. You can email me directly for more information.“I’ve tried EVERYTHING—this won’t work for me.”Two quick thoughts. First, you haven’t tried everything. UBM is brand new. This course is brand new.Second, with that attitude, you’re right. If you truly believe nothing will work for you… nothing will work for you.“What if it SUCKS? I’ve just thrown away money.”Do NOT enroll if you don’t have a sincere desire to LEARN, GROW, and APPLY the principles.There is a 110% money-back, risk-free guarantee, and you can read all about it here: Behavior Architecture (YES, that link saves you an INSTANT $200!)From Tenant Mode to Architect ModeHere’s where it clicks:Most people live in Tenant Mode. Essentially, forever.Tenant Mode is reactive. Mostly automatic.At the mercy of their environment, emotions, default stories—and default behaviors (habits).Your home is already designed.You’re in it right now.It might be so comfortable, there’s no “reason” to leave.That’s the catch.Everyone gets pulled in.And most stay there as long as possible.Just wait…When something shifts—and life is nothing but change—will you know what to adjust?A deadline moves.A relationship ends.Your energy crashes.A habit, once solid, suddenly fades.Where do you look?INSTANT $200 Savings here→ Join the waitlist here and lock in your Founders rateCut through the chaos, the confusion, and the overwhelm with pure, scientific CLARITY.🚨 The habit tracking controversy has finally been settled. Section 7.0 of the UBM whitepaper addresses every objection.Done and Done. Read it here →📄 Free habit tracking template: thehabitfactor.com/templates📖 Full UBM whitepaper: Zenodo.org📚 The trilogy that unearthed UBM:* The Habit Factor®* The Pressure Paradox™* EVERYTHING🌐 Learn more: unifiedbehaviormodel.com This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit habits2goals.substack.com/subscribe

How to Keep Behavioral Science Comfortably Incoherent — i.e., Ununified

Aug 18th, 2025 9:37 PM

On July 8th, in what can only be described as an act of reckless clarity, we published a white paper (grab it here—>) Unified Behavioral Model™ — Read more… listen now.Disclaimer: The following is a bit tongue-in-cheek. Just a bit.I have the utmost respect for the behavioral science community and its vast contributions—including the many scientists whose work has directly shaped my own.That said, the more I learn about the history of attempts to unify behavioral science (and, by association, psychology)—and then set those challenges alongside the Unified Behavior Model (UBM) as it now exists—formally published (elemental and falsifiable), 500+ downloads later—the more peculiar the entire situation becomes.To be clear: it’s only in hindsight that these “obvious” errors and omissions—both in behavioral science (BS) and in its unification efforts—come into focus.Subscribe nowTip #1: Make Sure Only True Insiders Get to PlayWhatever you do, don’t approach this unification challenge from the outside. That’s where troublemakers and fresh ideas tend to arise—reportedly. 👇Imagine that… via Stanford Business. Where is Stanford’s own Psychology Department when it comes to UBM? @stanfordpsypodInstead, ensure that no outside ideas are taken into account and non sneak their way in—even via OPEN SCIENCE. Better yet, throw up your hands and surrender: “Why Psychology Isn’t Unified, and Probably Never Will Be…” “PROBABLY NEVER WILL BE.”Valid points to be sure…“Why a Unified Theory of Psychology is Impossible”Unification as a Goal for PsychologyIt goes on and on—for several reasons, dear friends, which appear below.Tip #2 Prioritize Knowledge over ImaginationEnsure that only those fluent in four-letter acronyms, armed with multiple advanced degrees, and a dense theoretical vernacular are entrusted with presenting “novel” ideas.Further, insist that only those who can quote James, Pavlov, Watson, Bandura, Maslow, Skinner, and Freud backward and forward—and who possess psychological libraries spanning generations—be invited to contribute.“Imagination is more important than knowledge.” ~EinsteinTip #3: Form a Large Committee. The Larger, the BetterNothing unifies quite like 23—or maybe 43—strong personalities in one room.When “top behavioral theorists” gather for a week-long consortium, be sure to take minutes, roll in the whiteboard, and order extra coffee.Everyone knows: the more expert opinions, the quicker a consensus.As history (and a few hallucinating AIs) like to remind us, when it comes to unification attempts, the go-to answers are always consortia, committees, and bowling alleys.Darwin famously huddled with his nine-person advisory council.Einstein wouldn’t dream of publishing without first posting to social media.And Newton? Legendary for his gravitational consortiums.Here’s a nutty thought: what if that unified model came from one person on the fringe? (The fringe—see above ☝️.)One person. U N I — F I C A T I O N.⚠️ WARNING: Unification carries a dangerous synonym—coherence.By extension, it implies that the 150-year exercise known as behavioral science—and its twin sister, psychology—are, brace yourself...INCOHERENT.Oy.To be clear, that’s not me talking, it’s Webster.If you didn’t catch the 1991 reference—well, that was when the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) convened a “Top Behavioral Consortium.” Its noble goal? To create a “Unified Framework.”“What emerged?” you ask.The meeting —a week long gathering—brought together “leading human behavior theorists”. While a comprehensive roster of all attendees from this specific 1991 meeting is not fully detailed in the available documentation, a critical outcome of this expert gathering was the acknowledgment that “there was no consensus among the theorists” on a single, universally accepted unified framework.Imagine that. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit habits2goals.substack.com/subscribe

Black Swan Me | Unified Behavior Model™

Aug 4th, 2025 12:48 PM

On July 8th, in what can only be described as an act of reckless clarity, we published a white paper (grab it here—>) Unified Behavioral Model™ — Read more… listen now.Subscribe now“Science may be described as the art of systematic oversimplification.” ― Karl PopperWhat makes UBM so unique—so different from prevalent behavioral models?First, let’s clear up a common misconception:UBM—specifically the Behavior Echo-System (BES)—is a model of behavior, not a model of a person.People often see the graphic and assume it represents themselves, or a diagram of the human body. It doesn’t.As Dr. Popper’s statement above suggests, UBM simply articulates how behavior is influenced in the moment and shaped over time—within the system.Now, here’s the B.I.G. claim:UBM is falsifiable.In science, that’s the gold standard.(Period.)If a theory can’t be tested or broken, it’s just storytelling. Worse yet, Karl Popper would say it’s non-science.What’s his core claim? Science and non-science are divided by a single demarcation: Falsifiability.UBM asks—check that, insists—“Go for it… Please try to break me.”Apparently, no other behavior model—certainly not a unified one—has ever done that.Kind of interesting? Maybe just a bit?Worth mentioning, at least?Or dedicating, I don’t know… twenty-plus years to uncovering?UBM/BES Comparison Table & Major Prevalent Models as provided by DeepSeek.According to Dr. Karl Popper—and as noted in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “Karl Popper is generally regarded as one of the greatest philosophers of science of the twentieth century”—if a theory can’t be tested (or broken), it’s just storytelling. Worse, he’d call it “non-science.”Just to be clear: that’s Dr. Popper, philosopher and trained psychologist, who introduced the idea of falsifiability (and gave us that delightful bit with the Black Swan).So yeah—if you can’t at least attempt to break it, he says, it doesn’t count.UBM is so confident in its falsifiability that it’s offering a $1,000 reward to the first person to prove there’s a missing fifth element—one that isn’t reducible or emergent. (See below and bottom for official entry details.)So far: nearly 500 downloads and…Nada. Zip. Zilch. NOTHING.Even the world’s top AIs—ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Grok, DeepSeek—took their shots.They’ve all struck out. Attempts include: Time (environmental), Consciousness (emergent from the system), Willpower (embodied environment), Self-Organization (embodied environment—note the “self” in self-organization).The list goes on, and it’s kind of funny. Google’s Gemini, for example, offered a “someday” quantum property we don’t even know of yet.Seriously.Just to be clear: if we don’t know of it yet, and we can’t test it—it’s not a valid fifth element.DeepSeek’s parting words? Also comical...“UBM 1. DS 0... Game respects game.”And, here’s Gemini’s best response after half dozen attempts…Gemini tries desperately to break the Unified Behavior Model and fails.The difficulty in falsification, as intended by the model’s design, is a powerful indicator of its conceptual strength and it’s potential to serve as a TRULY UNIFYING FRAMEWORK FOR BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE. ~Gemini 8/4/2025Some have argued, “Well, UBM is overly simplified.”Really?Then why hasn’t anyone discovered it before—or more accurately, uncovered it and brought it to light?Surely, by now—150 years in—some behavioral scientist, somewhere in the world, would’ve presented this kind of systematic “oversimplification,” right?Let’s go over that one more time:“Science may be described as the art of systematic oversimplification.” ― Karl PopperThis is precisely Dr. Popper’s point: science progresses by oversimplifying—systematically.Voila: UBM. 👇“Great theories have simple pictorial representation.” —Michio KakuThe Behavior Echo-System (BES): the systematic simplification of behavior.Which makes it—by definition—the elemental science of behavior.Allegedly.Until—and unless—you produce the Black Swan.(Looking at you, top psych departments—according to U.S. News & World Report, 2025): @StanfordPsych, @HarvardPsych, @UCBPsychology, @UCLPALS, @Psych_at_Yale, @UMichPsych, @UCLA_Psych, @UCSDPsych, @OxfordPsych, @PrincetonPsych.Please, with all due respect, step right up. 👊 🤙 🙏 This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit habits2goals.substack.com/subscribe

Get this podcast on your phone, Free

Create Your Podcast In Minutes

  • Full-featured podcast site
  • Unlimited storage and bandwidth
  • Comprehensive podcast stats
  • Distribute to Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and more
  • Make money with your podcast
Get Started
It is Free