What to listen for:“We are very good at selectively breeding, obviously to drive change in the shape, but not necessarily to drive performance.”Robin and Stacy continue their conversation with Dr. Lindsay Waldrop, a Chapman University fluid dynamicist who secured Navy funding to build the world's largest collection of micro-CT-scanned domestic dog skulls.Dr. Waldrop discusses why skull morphology offers no reliable prediction of scent detection performance. Breed shape, muzzle length, turbinate den...
What to listen for:
“We are very good at selectively breeding, obviously to drive change in the shape, but not necessarily to drive performance.”
Robin and Stacy continue their conversation with Dr. Lindsay Waldrop, a Chapman University fluid dynamicist who secured Navy funding to build the world's largest collection of micro-CT-scanned domestic dog skulls.
Dr. Waldrop discusses why skull morphology offers no reliable prediction of scent detection performance. Breed shape, muzzle length, turbinate density… she says that none of it predicts which dogs will find the tin.
She cites a study that scanned roughly 125 museum skulls, landmarked them geometrically, and mapped the variation against breeds with historically scent-focused versus bite-work roles.
The answer was flat. No morphological feature sorted reliably by task. A Labrador has approximately the same mechanical bite leverage as a Malinois, yet nobody uses Labradors as patrol dogs, because that's behavior and genetics, not skull shape.
And the pug? In a separate Nathan Hall study, the pug outperformed German shepherds on a basic odor detection task. The greyhounds couldn't be bothered to participate.
Bloodhound ears sit in the same category. It’s a story told often enough to feel true, but never actually tested. From a fluid dynamics standpoint, Stacy says she'd be shocked if those ear flaps were routing scent toward the nose in any meaningful way.
The same applies to the claim (circulating on social media) that early scent initiation protocols increase the number of olfactory receptors in developing puppies. Specific, testable, evidence-free.
It’s important to distinguish science-based reasoning versus evidence-based claims. Dr. Waldrop’s flow visualization work is science-based, informed by expertise, probably accurate, not publishable as proof. But claiming a puppy protocol rewires the olfactory system is an evidence-based claim with almost no data behind it.
Key Topics:
- When the Dog Is Right and the Handler Is Wrong (01:36)
- The Pug That Beat the German Shepherd (12:54)
- What Skull Shape Actually Tells Us About Scent Work (14:02)
- A Navy-Funded Micro-CT Scan of 125 Dog Skulls (15:37)
- The Bloodhound Ear Story No One Has Tested (23:08)
- Science-Based vs. Evidence-Based: Why the Difference Matters (30:01)
- The Essential Oil Claim That Doesn't Hold Up to Physics (36:50)
- Can Nose Work Dogs Learn to Sniff Bigger? (46:37)
- Takeaways (49:20)
Resources:
Connect to Dr. Waldrop!:
· https://waldroplab.com/
· https://www.chapman.edu/our-faculty/lindsay-waldrop.aspx
We want to hear from you:
- Check out the K9 Detection Collaborative FB page and comment on the episode post!
- K9Sensus Detection Dog Trainer Academy
- K9Sensus Foundation can be found on Facebook and Instagram. We have a Trainer’s Group on Facebook!
- Scentsabilities Nosework is also on Facebook. Here is a Facebook group you should join!
- You can follow us for notifications of upcoming episodes, find us at k9detectioncollaborative.com to enjoy the freebies, and tell your friends so you can keep the conversations going.
- And don’t forget to check out the YouTube Channel!
View more
