Links:
About This Episode:
Numerous nutrition studies present findings of “no effect,” but interpreting such results requires caution. A null finding, indicating an absence of impact from a nutrient or exposure, may not necessarily suggest a lack of effect overall. Instead, it could stem from issues related to the study’s design, the nature of the exposure, or participant characteristics.
We’ve often referred to such studies as being “null by design”.
These studies, often termed “null by design,” may yield inconclusive results due to insufficient contrast in exposure levels to reveal a significant effect size. Additionally, participants’ baseline nutrient status or intake can contribute to false negatives. For instance, if a study provides a nutrient to individuals already replete in that nutrient, it may lead to an erroneous conclusion. This phenomenon can be understood by considering the bell curve of activity for a nutrient.
Moreover, a lack of methodological rigor can generate ‘false negatives.’ If previous literature indicates associations between high intake of a specific food or nutrient and certain outcomes, a study comparing levels of intake well below that threshold may produce a misleading result.
Some challenges arise from an overly reductionist perspective. In disease processes, reductionism simplifies diseases to a single primary source at the cellular and molecular level. This perspective assumes that if a nutrient shows a relationship with health or disease outcomes at a population level, its biological activity should manifest in isolation. However, applying such assumptions to exposures like diet may not be tenable.
In this discussion, we delve into the concept of “null by design” and present three specific studies with null findings, emphasizing the need for careful interpretation.
#460: Dr. Priya Sumithran – Body Fat Regulation, Pros & Cons of Weight Loss Interventions, and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
#459: Nicky Keay, MB BChir – Hormones & Healthspan: The Endocrine System Across the Life Course
What Are Stable Isotopes? How Are Tracers Used in Nutrition Research? (Preview)
#458: How Foods Impact Satiety, Hunger & Appetite
#457: Austin Robinson, PhD – Salt Sensitive vs Salt Resistant, Impacts of Sodium on Health, & Racial Differences in Risk
#456: Prof. Glenn McConell – Glucose Uptake During Exercise & Muscle Insulin Sensitivity
#455: Jill Joyce, PhD – Improving the Diets of Tactical Populations
SNP9: AMA – Blood Pressure, LDL Lowering, PCOS & More!
#454: Eric Helms, PhD – Plant or Animal Protein: Rethinking Protein & Muscle
#453: Nick Gant, PhD – Cognitive Performance: Impact of Caffeine, Nicotine & Creatine (Rebroadcast)
#452: Stuart Phillips, PhD - Bacterially Synthesized Whey, Plant vs. Animal Proteins, Muscle & Extended Fasts, & Much More
#451: Potassium & Blood Pressure: Influence of Sex & Sodium
#450: Megan Rossi, PhD, RD – Diet For a Healthy Gut: Diversity, Fiber Types & Gut Health Pseudoscience
#449: Do Artificial Sweeteners Increase Cancer Risk? (Study Analysis)
#448: Prof. Norman Temple – Can Science Answer Diet-Health Questions?
#447: Does Eating Fish Increase Skin Cancer Risk? Study Analysis
SNP7: Stephan Guyenet, PhD - Ask Me Anything!
#446: How Climate Change Impacts Nutrient Status
#445: Dr. Hazel Wallace - Nutrition for Women’s Health
SNP6: GRADE System: What is it? And How Does it Apply to Nutrition? [Preview]
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Practically Healthy by Dr. Melina
ZOE Science & Nutrition
Intermittent Fasting Stories
The Model Health Show
Nutrition Diva