In Episode 142, we tell you about a victory for free speech after a court rules Ontario can't ban billboards just because they criticize politicians and public health officials. Plus, a horrific Ontario incest case shows why the reasonable hypotheticals doctrine isn't so reasonable after all. Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:R. v. D.C. #2, 2026 ONSC 3029 (CanLii)Katerberg v. Ontario (Ministry of Transportation), 2026 ONSC 3991 (CanLII)Judge says it would be 'cruel and...
In Episode 142, we tell you about a victory for free speech after a court rules Ontario can't ban billboards just because they criticize politicians and public health officials. Plus, a horrific Ontario incest case shows why the reasonable hypotheticals doctrine isn't so reasonable after all.
Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:
- R. v. D.C. #2, 2026 ONSC 3029 (CanLii)
- Katerberg v. Ontario (Ministry of Transportation), 2026 ONSC 3991 (CanLII)
- Judge says it would be 'cruel and unusual' to send Ontario man who sexually assaulted 12-year-old sister to jail (National Post)
Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn, with help from Alexander Surgenor.
The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.
View more