Tokyo Teasers, Women’s Rugby Risks, and Doping Double Standards

Get with the Discourse, and share thoughts on the subjects we tackle - a small monthly pledge gets you into the VIP room for the "best content on the internet!". Plus, we really value the support!

Don't forget you can also watch us on YouTube!

Show notes

In this Spotlight, our news roundup begins with a look ahead to the Tokyo World Championships, via a rewind to the Diamond League finals in Zurich. Has Zurich shown the way forward for field events? We unpack whether this model can help the field events and thus sport grow, celebrate new stars and seasoned champions. We discuss how moving the World Championships to the season’s end poses unique challenges for athletes, and stretches the physiological peak many can sustain. We look ahead to epic clashes, where new favourites have emerged and old stars have shown form at just the right time.

From track to turf, we turn to rugby and the doping case of Asenathi Ntlabakanye. The South African prop has been provisionally suspended after a positive test for a substance SA Rugby has said was not performance-enhancing and was medically prescribed. Ross and Gareth explore what this may mean, and the broader grey areas that challenge athlete rights and fairness in sport.

Then in Center Stage (53:34), the Women’s Rugby World Cup takes the spotlight. The tournament is off to a fantastic start, breaking records and continuing its growth. But Ross explains why wide performance gaps between rugby’s juggernauts and minnows could threaten the game’s continued long-term prospects, and how targeted investment will be key to keeping the sport competitive and fair.

In Ross Replies (1:09:42), Stu asks whether women experience head injuries differently from men? Ross explains that the answer is "it depends", a variation of yes and what this means for preventing head injury in women. And Finally (1:18:39), Mike asked for insight on whether children should be taught to tackle when learning rugby, and we discuss why the answer is a cautious, and qualified "yes", with some evidence and a cautionary tale about how the speed with which we introduce risk is the key.

Links

• Story on Ntlabakanye's doping positive and SARU's statement
• The NCAA team that lost a title because of caffeine
• As discussed re the NCAA, the London Marathon death attributed to a stimulant in a weight loss supplement
• Stu's question and discussion about head injury mechanisms in women's rugby: Discourse members only
• Ross' paper describing head injury mechanisms in elite women
• The paper that documents head accelerations in players aged 13 to adult

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.