In a high-stakes presidential election year, in partnership with the Newt and Jo Minow Debate Series at the Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, Open to Debate is taking a look at more than a decade of the Citizens United Supreme Court case. The 2010 landmark decision that ruled the free speech clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting independent expenditures for political communications by corporations, including nonprofits, labor unions, and other associations, changed the landscape of political spending in the U.S. This gave rise to Super PACS and an increase in election campaign spending. Since then, there have been questions about whether the decision has harmed our democratic process. Those who support the decision argue it upholds free speech, allowing diverse voices in the political arena, and broadens the range of discourse by enabling groups to freely express their views and support candidates or policies. Those against it argue that it allows a disproportionate influence from corporations and special interest groups, and leaves the voices of ordinary citizens overshadowed by the financial resources of a few, eroding the principles of equality and fair representation.
With this context, we debate the question: Has Citizens United Undermined Democracy?
This debate is presented in partnership with the Northwestern Pritzker School of Law as part of the Newt and Jo Minow Debate Series. It will be recorded live in person on Wednesday, February 21, 2024, at the Thorne Auditorium at Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law in Chicago, Illinois.
Arguing Yes: Francesca Procaccini, Assistant Professor of Law at Vanderbilt University Law School; Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, Professor of Law at Stetson University
Arguing No: Floyd Abrams, Senior Counsel at Cahill Gordon & Reindel; Eric Wang, Partner at The Gober Group, pro bono Senior Fellow at the Institute for Free Speech
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
#200 - Are Big Cities Past Their Prime?
Agree to Disagree: Is It Time to End the Covid Emergency?
Agree to Disagree: Ukraine
#199 - Should We Use Gene Editing to Make Better Babies?
Agree to Disagree: Is True Love a Myth?
#198 - Is America Retreating from Global Leadership?
IQ2 Conversation: A New University Offers "Forbidden" Courses
The Pandemic: Year-In-Review
#197 - Is Amazon Good for Small Business?
Agree to Disagree: Meritocracy
#196 - Is Cancel Culture Toxic?
Agree to Disagree: Booster Shots
Agree to Disagree: Cyber War and Hacker Ransoms
#195 - Should We Expand the Supreme Court?
#194 - Is the United Nations Obsolete?
Agree to Disagree: Build Back Better
Agree to Disagree COVID Series: Vaccine Mandates (Updated)
Agree to Disagree: Leaving Afghanistan
Debate Roundup: America's Guns
#193 - Has the New York Times Lost Its Way?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Meaningful Life with Andrew G. Marshall
The No-Frills Teacher Podcast
Heal, Survive & Thrive!
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast