Alex Newman - From Ballots to Bullets: The Political Scandals Rocking America

Shownotes and Transcript

We welcome the return of Alex Newman as he discusses the U.S. political landscape, focusing on Kamala Harris's rise and the media's manufactured perception of her. He highlights public disillusionment with mainstream media and critiques polling reliability as a tool for shaping opinion. Alex warns about electoral vulnerabilities and the influence of the Chinese Communist Party on Western politics. He stresses the importance of reclaiming education to counter ideological indoctrination and discusses the evolving media landscape's role in fostering free speech. The conversation concludes with a call for citizen engagement to preserve democracy and American values.

Alex Newman is an award-winning international journalist, educator, author, speaker, investor, and consultant who seeks to glorify God in everything he does.
In addition to serving as president of Liberty Sentinel Media, Inc, he has written for a wide array of publications in the United States and abroad. He currently serves as a contributor to the Epoch Times, a correspondent for the Law Enforcement Intelligence Brief, foreign correspondent and senior editor for The New American magazine, a writer for WND (World Net Daily), an education writer for FreedomProject Media, a columnist for the Illinois Family Institute, and much more.
Over his career as a journalist, Alex has interviewed current and former heads of state, members of Congress, royalty, and countless other fascinating people. His work, which has received numerous awards, has been repeatedly highlighted by Drudge, Breitbart, Fox News, and many other outlets. His writing has been published in major newspapers across America, and his PR work has appeared in the New York Times, the Washington Post, Reuters, the Associated Press, and more.
In addition, Alex has authored and co-authored several books. One of his major works was an exposé of government schools with internationally renowned Dr. Samuel Blumenfeld called Crimes of the Educators published by WND Books. It was endorsed by conservative leaders ranging from Phyllis Schlafly to Ron Paul.
Across multiple platforms and with tens of millions of views on his videos so far, Alex also hosts and co-hosts a number of shows. Alex hosts The Sentinel Report on the Frank Speech network which reaches many millions worldwide. Separately, he hosts Behind The Deep State and Conversations That Matter. Finally, he co-hosts Unravelling the Narrative.
Alex is on the Leadership Council of Freedom Force International, one of the premier liberty organizations in the world. He also serves as a director for the organization Bear Witness Central, which works to protect and preserve the U.S. Constitution by educating the public in partnership with other conservative organizations. Alex is a Leadership Fellow at the James Madison Institute, Florida’s premier free-market think tank. And he serves on the advisory board of Citizens for Free Speech.
Alex has a B.S. degree in journalism from the University of Florida with an emphasis on economics and international relations, as well as an A.A. degree in foreign languages from Miami-Dade College. He also studied international relations at the Institute Français des Alpes in France.

Connect with Alex...
WEBSITE            libertysentinel.org
GETTR                gettr.com/user/AlexNewman
𝕏                          x.com/ALEXNEWMAN_JOU

Interview recorded  15.8.24

Connect with Hearts of Oak...
𝕏                         x.com/HeartsofOakUK
WEBSITE            heartsofoak.org/
PODCASTS        heartsofoak.podbean.com/
SOCIAL MEDIA  heartsofoak.org/connect/
SHOP                  heartsofoak.org/shop/

Transcript

(Hearts of Oak)

And hello, Hearts of Oak.

Welcome to another interview.

And I'm delighted to have Alex Newman back with us again. Alex, thank you so much for your time today.

(Alex Newman)

It's a pleasure to be here. Thank you so much, Peter.

People can follow you @AlexNewman_JOU,

The Liberty Sentinel

on the screen there.

And obviously the links are in the description.

And obviously you can follow and also on Patriot TV.

I know Alex is streaming there, which is a General Flynn's network. Work so many places defined Alex giving his input into what is happening I had the privilege of being on with Alex on his show giving overview of some of the things in the UK, so I wanted him to come on and share the the madness in the US, otherwise we face madness here in the UK.

But Alex it's...

We've had a number of US guests on the last couple of weeks but not on a focus on the current situation in the US.

And in the last few months, we've gone from an assassination attempt on President Trump, we've gone for a coup to remove sleepy Joe or whoever was in charge.

And we're now being told that Kamala Harris is utterly popular despite her pulling, I think, 2% whenever she was running previously for President.

And nothing seems to make sense on all of that. Maybe, where do I start?

Maybe, and of course, into that, we have Monkeypox.

We have a global pandemic has just been announced.

You kind of think some of these things are coming together.

You can join the dots. But maybe, let's maybe look at the political side, Alex.

This media enthusiasm and euphoria for Kamala, who is embarrassing, utterly embarrassing.

How does that kind of come around with going from sleepy Joe to someone who actually no one seemed to want, and now suddenly she's the rising star.

Well, it's an entirely manufactured process, Peter.

There is very little genuine support for Kamala Harris.

Even the handful of neighbours in the little town that I live in that did have support for Joe Biden, either on their bumper sticker or in their sign.

No sign of Kamala Harris bumper stickers or signs.

I think the perception of popularity is entirely manufactured.

It is entirely fraudulent, just like so much of the reality that the fake media is painting for us. Now, we know that Americans don't believe this stuff.

Just a few months ago, there was a poll out showing that I think over 60% of Americans regard the media as enemies of the people.

And that's their phony polls. My guess is it's probably significantly higher than that.

And polling really has become not so much a tool for gauging public opinion, but rather a tool for attempting to shape public opinion.

So, I don't think people are buying this. You may have some people that live in the bubble in New York City, Washington, D.C., San Francisco that still believe this stuff.

But for the most part, I always tell people, go talk to normal people.

Go meet your waitress. Go meet your flight attendant, your plumber, your mechanic, your Uber driver, your taxi driver, the guy serving burgers at the McDonald's.

And what you'll find is that normal people, by and large, see through the lies.

They may not understand all the details.

They may not even see the big picture, but they know they're being lied to.

They don't like it.

And they're not willing to go along with the silly propaganda any longer.

We have seen the exact use of the polling numbers in the UK whenever we had our election, basically telling the public who to vote for, telling them it was a foregone conclusion, and vote for the far left in Labour.

And we've moved away, you're right, from when polling was independent and supposed to inform of the general feeling, not seem to be driven by forces.

What you mentioned is exactly what we've had here in the UK.

Are there independent polling?

I mean, how do you get around that to actually gauge public opinion instead of driving the narrative?

Well, there are some agencies, some polling entities that are better than others. Rasmussen and Gallup historically have done a slightly better job than the so-called mainstream ones.

But even occasionally with the mainstream polling agencies, you'll find a little nugget of truth.

And what they do is they promptly bury it when they accidentally stumble upon it.

But last year, I believe it was the AP Nork Center for Public Affairs, which is public affairs research, which is a very mainstream left wing polling agency.

They did a really interesting survey.

They asked Americans about their opinions on so-called climate change.

So they asked Americans, first of all, do you believe in climate change to which any sensible person would say, well, of course, the climate changes.

It's always changed. Wouldn't it be silly to pretend like it doesn't change?

And then they asked a follow up question, which they probably regret doing now.

Now, do you believe that the climate change is mostly man-made?

And what they found out was that significantly less than half of Americans believe in man-made global warming, man-made climate change.

And so they quickly buried the results of that and pretended like it didn't happen.

So, even occasionally, the mainstream polling agencies will get something right.

But what they've done with Kamala Harris and Donald Trump talked about this just this week, they've even adjusted their formula from three weeks ago to try to make Kamala Harris look more popular.

So, what they're really planning on doing, Peter, and I don't want to get you in trouble with any of the outlets that may carry here, but so I'll try to not use the trigger terms that the AI would pick up on.

They are planning to use fraud, essentially.

One of the mechanisms that they're using, they've got hundreds of thousands of phony voter registrations, especially in all the key swing states.

They've got, you know, a thousand people registered to vote at a Walmart.

They've got 200 people registered to vote at an empty lot.

And what these are, a lot of them are illegal immigrants, dead people, foreigners.

People, felons, people who are not eligible to vote.

And what happens is they go and then they collect all these ballots, they fill them out.

And so we've had a few states now that have said, well, we're going to do paper ballots.

We're going to do hand counting.

We're going to get rid of the machines.

Well, you can count fake ballots till you're blue in the face. You're still going to get the same result if you've got a bunch of fake ballots in there.

And so we've got a real problem on this. There are, of course, very serious efforts to stop this before it happens.

But their strategy is to try to manufacture a perception of support for Kamala Harris, do whatever it takes to win the election using fraudulent means, and then gaslight us all to believe that: hey, the perception of popular support must have been real because look at the final election result.

Anybody who says otherwise is a vicious conspiracy theorist, a homophobe, a sexist, whatever nasty terms you can think of.

And now everybody shut up and maybe we'll have another fake attack on the Capitol to round it all up and persecute and prosecute people who don't agree with this.

So, that's what they're planning to do, whether they'll get away with it or not, is, I think, an open question.

There are a lot of very smart people working to stop these shenanigans.

And what just happened in Virginia, very encouraging.

The governor did an executive order.

We're not going to be using the voting machines.

We're going to do paper ballots.

So these are signs of progress.

But we're going to need a whole lot more to be able to stop what really, I believe, is a criminal operation here, masquerading as a political campaign.

Fill me in on, because you can have the voter goes and votes on a machine, and then you've kind of machines counting it, obviously, if that's done.

But even if you have paper ballots, you can still have machines counting them.

And that's a world away from, I mean, the UK where you watch the counters running in with the boxes and actually you can have your pool agent watching them physically count them.

Everything is counted and you can challenge a lot.

That same, I guess, transparency doesn't seem to be in the US.

And I saw the announcement in Virginia and I also saw a lot of pushback to say, well, this doesn't necessarily solve it.

Do you want to just...

Feed into that, because I don't know if that's the silver bullet that we've seen with the Virginia announcement.

Yeah, no, I agree with you.

I don't think what happened in Virginia is nearly enough to protect us. I mentioned the phony voter registration.

You've got huge numbers of people who are not eligible to vote.

In many cases, they're dead, signed up to receive ballots through the mail. And so this is a recipe for rigging.

You could use hand counting paper ballots all day, like I said.

And if you've got hundreds of thousands of of fake ballots from ineligible voters filled out by party hacks for the Democrats, again, you could count all day.

You could recount and recount again, and you're still going to get the same result. It's going to be a flawed election.

So, this is very simple, Peter. I grew up in the third world, mostly Latin America, then Europe, and then down to Africa.

So, I've seen elections in a lot of different countries.

I lived in eight different countries, and I've seen a lot of different election processes play out.

I can say unequivocally, the United States, the various states are the worst systems I've ever seen.

I still remember as a kid in Mexico, people would all be walking around with a black thumb because they'd go in and you'd have to vote in person.

You'd have to show your ID.

Then you'd put your finger in the ink so that you couldn't go back in and vote again.

It seems very low tech, but Americans ran legitimate elections for hundreds of years in this country.

And we did it the same way everybody else has always done legitimate elections.

In-person voting on the day of the election, you show your ID so you can prove who you are.

And then you hand count it with anybody who wants to witness that counting present in the room.

You have a secure chain of custody for the ballots where people from all the different parties and factions can watch those ballots from the time they're put into the box to the time they're counted.

This is a no brainer, right?

If Americans can send somebody to the moon, we can send rockets into space.

We can send submersibles to the bottom of the ocean.

We can certainly run an election.

The problem is there are very powerful people, Peter, who don't want a legitimate election, because they're terrified of what the American people would vote for if they were allowed to express their opinion in a legitimate, lawful election.

Exactly.

And you mentioned you grew up in some third world countries, then you said parts of Europe are third world.

And worse and worse by the moment, right?

We'll not even get into that because there's enough on the U.S. My concern, and I've seen some states talking about cleaning up the system, and some groups are doing very good work.

Regularly, I see individuals, organizations coming on the War Room and discussing the work that they are doing in cleaning up the ballots.

My concern is that, one, is it too little, too late?

And that does not take away from people still being involved, because the more people involved, the better to hold the system to account. on.

But you've got work in red states where blue states seem to actually just perpetuate the problem and make it worse. And you seem to have this massive divide.

Yeah.

And this is all by design, Peter.

Again, it's very simple to run a free, fair, legitimate election that is beyond dispute.

And historically, at least, everybody had an interest in doing that. Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, we all wanted honest elections, even if it didn't go our way.

We wanted to know that there was an honest election, because even if we lost, that meant that next election we could fix the problem.

We would have another chance to turn the disaster around.

But now we have incredibly powerful vested interests. And some of the arguments that they make, Peter, are so unbelievably ludicrous.

You have trouble believing that somebody is making them with a straight face, like the idea that somehow minorities, whatever that means, can't get IDs.

And so it's It's racist to require a voter ID.

I mean, that is the most patronizing, racist, ridiculous argument I've ever heard. How could you say that people with darker skin aren't capable of getting an ID?

Oh, they're capable of getting an ID to buy cigarettes or pay their taxes or play the lotto or buy a bottle of liquor.

But when it comes to voting, it would be racist to ask them to have an ID.

I mean, that's the most patronizing, racist, ridiculous argument that anybody could make.

And yet you have people seriously going on CNN and MSNBC saying that it's racist.

It's racist Republicans who want to demand voter ID. So this tells you that there are very powerful forces promoting this idea.

You know, the concept of a deep state, which that was not a term that was in the popular lexicon even a decade ago, but today it's widely understood to be operational in the United States.

Speaking of polling, the Monmouth University Polling Institute ran a poll back in, I believe it was 2017.

They found that 75% of Americans recognize that we have a deep state in this country defined as a group of unaccountable shadowy elites in the shadows trying to control government policy.

And when you realize that that's happening, right, everything is not as it seems on TV.

There is a powerful group of people who don't want legitimate elections, who do want to surrender the sovereignty of the United States, who do want to undermine the Constitution of the United States.

Then all of it makes sense. Right?

And I don't think you can understand the American political system unless you understand that we do have this.

And, you know, people talk about the entrenched bureaucracy.

Yeah, that's a big part of it.

But even beyond that, you've got groups like the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers, the weirdos at the Bohemian Grove.

These are the groups that we need to be talking about because these are the groups that are meeting in secret behind closed doors with no public record.

The CEOs, the political leadership, et cetera.

And we need to be looking at this and we need to be talking about this to find out the source of some of these claims, some of these lies, some of these very, very disingenuous systems like the fraudulent election systems that have now been put into place all across the United States.

And if we want to solve it, we have to call this out.

And I want to get into that globalist theme because I know you spoke a couple of weeks ago at the World War III conference down in Arizona.

And I've been impressed by what Karen has done with putting news around the country.

Very exciting. But for the election, I've watched U.S. media because it's more interesting than U.K. Media.

You and I've, well, I even saw a talk show recently and they talked about CNN providing uh the news that is unbiased and the whole audience laughed and then I made the comment: oh that wasn't a laughing point that wasn't a joke.

I do you think: wow you get kind of those insights that the media don't want you to see and the public are aware of what's happening and little snippets like that make you sit back and think: whoa, yes, the message is getting through.

Yeah.

And that was really telling because Stephen Colbert's audience is leftist, right?

I mean, these are the people who are on the far left fringe of the American political spectrum.

And even they are laughing at the idea that CNN is an unbiased purveyor of news.

So, you know, we all know it. And even the liberals who watch it know that it's not unbiased news.

And I think that's an important and very revealing insight into what's happening here.

It's very muchakin, people think this is strange, but it's very much akin to the Soviet Union, right? Everybody knew that Pravda was fake news.

And the people writing the news and Pravda knew that it was fake news.

And they knew that the people reading it knew that it was fake news.

So, part of it is just to create this perception. Part of it is to demoralize people.

And that is dangerous in and of itself, even though everybody knows that it's baloney, even though everybody knows that it's lies and propaganda and misinformation.

Just the fact that it's out there is actually very beneficial to the cause of tyranny that that these people are advancing.

But I do believe they will try to stop Donald Trump using any means possible to continue on this election theme.

Back in at the end of 2017, Peter, I got a phone call from Roger Stone.

He's been a very close friend of Donald Trump since the 80s.

He was actually the first advisor to ever suggest to him that he run for president.

And so he calls me up. He says, Alex, come to my house, please.

We need to talk about this.

There's less than a year into Donald Trump's presidency.

And he says, look, the deep state was the term he used is going to do anything and everything possible to stop and destroy Donald Trump.

And so he laid out the roadmap. It was to go back and read this. I published an article about it in the New American magazine, January 2nd of 2018.

It's like reading the future before it happened.

It was unbelievable.

So, he says their plan A is going to be to try to destroy him with this Russia collusion hoax. And that's ultimately going to fail because it's so obviously fraudulent.

Now, it did take out General Michael Flynn.

It helped them take down a whole bunch of Trump's closest associates. Later, they went after Paul Manafort, his campaign chair.

They ripped Roger Stone and his wife out of bed at five in the morning with the CNN clown car in tow.

They put, of course, Steve Bannon behind bars.

Now, Peter Navarro just got out.

So, they did manage to take out a lot of his people.

And that Russia collusion hoax was a big part of that.

Then Stone said, plan B, he said, plan A is not going to work, but plan B.

They're going to try to use the 25th Amendment to have him declared mentally incompetent.

And of course, that's exactly what happened.

I even spoke to some of the members of the cabinet.

They said, oh, yeah, there's a real effort to recruit us to declare Donald Trump mentally incompetent.

And Roger Stone said at that time, there are snakes in the cabinet. There are evildoers within his administration at the highest levels who will stab him in the back in a heartbeat.

But that's going to fail, too.

And then he said, this is what I use for the headline.

Deep state plan C, he said, is to just murder him, to do what they did to John F. Kennedy to take him out with a bullet if necessary.

And so when this shot was taken at Donald Trump on July 13th, that was the first thing that came to my mind. Wow. Roger Stone was right again.

That's what this was. And I continue to believe that that's what this was.

I don't believe for a second that some 20 year old punk outsmarted the most sophisticated protective agency on the face of the planet.

That's ludicrous.

Lots of evidence suggests that he was the fall guy.

He may have actually taken some shots. I don't know specifically what happened, but I know the official story we're being told makes no sense.

And so with that in mind, I believe they will go to plan D and plan E and plan F, whatever it takes.

And if that means shooting him, if that means rigging the election, if that means crashing the U.S. Economy.

If that means declaring another public health emergency of international concern or four at the same time, if that means unleashing what the World Economic Forum described last year as a poly crisis, economic crisis, cyber attack, attack, a public health crisis, all at the same time, whatever it takes.

And if they can't stop him.

They actually war-gamed this out in 2020.

They put together the Transition Integrity Project funded by George Soros.

They brought in the Podesta creeps of spirit cooking fame to help lead this.

They looked at what are the most likely scenarios here.

And in this scenario where they could not stop Donald Trump, no matter what, the election was so overwhelming and so obvious they couldn't stop him.

What did they do?

They said, hey, let's have Washington, Oregon and California secede from the union. Let's send out the terror mobs into the cities to start burning down communities and become ungovernable.

They will absolutely do that again if they have to.

So, they are determined to stop him, because they are terrified that he will undo now generations of progress from their perspective that they have made on surrendering our sovereignty, undermining our liberty, and ultimately destroying the United States of America.

So, we've got to be on alert. Election fraud is one mechanism, but it's one tool in a giant toolbox that includes a lot of other options as well.

No, completely.

And if the viewers or listeners The WarRoom Posse are involved in those efforts to make sure and clean up what's happening in your state, please continue because you have a huge part to play.

Amen

Alex, you're involved in the media, very much a media figure, you've got an assessment and every election cycle brings changes in the media; four years ago supposedly you'd Fox kind off or Trump but you'd also Newsmax you'd weigh in and you've got a number of other channels channels that people could watch on TV.

This election cycle seems to be driven by something different, and that's alternative media.

And that's risen to a level that really wasn't even there four years ago. It was certainly there, but it seems to be where people now go to get their news and information.

Do you want to just speak into that?

Because you understand the industry, history and you understand that legacy media, the alternative media, and the importance of the media that is their alternative media to actually get the message out directly to the voters.

Yeah, and that's so important to understand, Peter.

I think 2016 is when the establishment finally realized that all of their fake media combined had lost control of the narrative.

And by that, I very much include, you know, the controlled opposition media, Fox, and every once in a while they invite me on.

But, you know, controlled opposition, as far as I'm I'm concerned.

Rupert Murdoch is not a conservative.

He's not a patriot.

He doesn't love America and love God and all these things that people mistakenly assume when they hear the talking heads on Fox News.

So, 2016 was really a turning point for them.

There was a study that 92 plus percent of the network coverage of Donald Trump was negative.

Out of the top 100 newspapers in the United States, I think only two were openly endorsing Donald Trump.

The vast majority were were endorsing his opponent.

All of the cable broadcasts, including, by the way, Fox News during the primary was anti-Trump.

And yet still he demolished them. And so I did some analysis.

You know, I went to YouTube and I look, for example, at Alex Jones. Alex Jones, a very popular nationally syndicated radio host.

This guy was getting more views on his election coverage than all the fake media on YouTube combined. You could take CBS, NBC, ABC, Fox, CNN, Washington Post, New York Times, combine them together.

And Alex Jones's videos covering the election, we're getting more views than them.

And so regardless of what you think about Alex Jones, that is a devastating indictment of how seriously people take the media.

And so what was their solution? Well, demonize.

Yes.

But ultimately it was, well, we just can't have even a semblance of free speech anymore.

We can't just rig the algorithms.

Now, we've just got to go ahead and ban people completely.

So, they're at the point now where they have realized they've totally lost control of the narrative through their fake media.

And so now the alternative media, if you want to call it that, has become a hugely significant force, not just in American politics, but at the international level.

We saw this, too, during the pandemic.

People just don't believe them anymore.

The FDA is now recommending the 10th booster, I believe.

OK, less than 10 percent of Americans actually went and got their booster.

So, nobody believes the government anymore.

Nobody believes the fake media anymore.

Nobody believes the public health system, the education system.

We all know they're lying.

So, we're in a new era.

And I think what we're going to see here is, of course, efforts to increase censorship.

You guys in the UK are, of course, living through this right now.

European Union sending ridiculous letters to Elon Musk, threatening him with more lawfare.

He just doesn't interview with Donald Trump.

We're going to see a lot more of that.

The UN is now working overtime on this at the summit of the future.

They're going to hopefully, in their eyes, enshrine a bunch of these controls on free speech and the Internet into international law or at least soft law.

So, they are now working overtime to try to figure out what do we do here?

Do we just censor everybody?

Do we try to co-opt some of the alternative media?

Do we get more controlled opposition and let them say some things that we don't like?

But then when the time comes to some issue that really matters, we'll let the truth come out that there are minions.

So we've got to recognize this.

And I would encourage people also with all of that in mind, find alternative ways to communicate with neighbours, with people in your community and stop relying on the big tech companies.

Don't go to Google for your news anymore.

Find outlets that you trust like this wonderful program, like the War Room, you know, get a subscription to print magazines.

I write for the epic times of the new American magazine, find outlets that you like, and that you trust so that you don't have to go to Google or Yahoo or Bing to figure out what's going on in the world.

You've got reliable sources that you can trust.

That's going to be more important than ever in the years ahead because things are about to get really confusing.

And as I mentioned at the beginning.

I had the privilege of being on with you on your show and talking about what's happening in the UK and then across Europe with that censorship and the government using what they perceive as a few days of riots to actually clamp down and throw a thousand people in jail and hugely restrict the conversations on social media and your ability even to repost.

And the threat is even if Elon Musk may, actually, they may have an extradition attempt on him to UK. That's how crazy.

But you understand, Alex, that that's just not contained to the UK or Europe.

That same restriction and clamp down on free speech, that can happen in the US as well. And the US is not immune to that.

No, and in fact, people, there's this really pervasive myth out there, even among conservatives who should know better, that the United States is this impenetrable fortress of free speech because we have the First Amendment.

If recent events in the last few months didn't show you that that wasn't true, I don't know what will.

You had the U.S. Supreme Court agreeing that the Biden regime, I mean, they twisted themselves into pretzels to come up with a silly decision to kind of obscure what they were doing.

But they essentially said, yeah, the Biden regime can pressure big tech companies to silence anybody that they don't like on COVID or the election or anything else.

And there's even been more direct assaults on free speech that people haven't connected the dots yet.

I'll give you one example, this proliferation of what they call conversion therapy laws.

These are in place now in numerous States.

They're in place in numerous jurisdictions.

And people think this is something that applies to psychotherapists, psychiatrists, psychologists, and quacks of various shapes and sizes.

A lot of these laws are written to apply specifically to pastors and to parents.

And so they want you to think of somebody torturing a homosexual kid or a transgender kid.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

When you read these statutes, they say that any attempt to tell a person that they may not need to be involved in homosexuality, that they may not need to be involved in transgenderism, that that's conversion therapy and that is punishable under the law, in some cases with prison time.

And so what does that mean, say, for a Christian, right?

Because Christians have this habit of preaching the gospel, that Jesus Christ can save you, he can transform you, he can make you a new creation, he can replace your heart of stone with a heart of flesh.

And that would mean, by extension, that if you're stuck in some sort of sinful activity or some sort of confusing idea, that he can liberate you from that.

Well, that's conversion therapy.

So we are going to see, I believe, in this country, actual attempts to imprison pastors.

Now, before coming back to the the United States, the most recent country I lived in was Sweden.

And Sweden is really like a Petri dish where these elitists try out their crazy ideas before they spread like a cancer through the Western world.

So in 2008.

The Swedish ombudsman for justice did an investigation into the Bible, the Bible, and they posted their report, their findings online.

They said, well, it turns out the Bible is actually a violation of our hate speech laws.

He did say to his credit, it's not practical for us to ban it right now, maybe because people would think we're a fascist dictatorship.

I don't know. But he said, if we would change the words around, you know, if we could get rid of this verse, maybe replace that word, then it wouldn't be a violation of the law.

So this is the direction that things are going in Sweden.

And of course, in the United Kingdom, they throw preachers in jail.

Look up Alke Green, Pentecostal preacher.

They threw him in jail for his comments on homosexuality in a sermon in his church.

And Americans who don't think that will come here are simply not paying attention.

And we saw it during COVID. Well, you can't have church.

Church is not essential.

Abortions are essential. Your marijuana shop, your liquor store, that's essential, but you can't have church. You can just do your sermons online.

Now, suddenly the Biden administration could tell Facebook: hey, don't let anybody preach against the COVID mandates.

Don't let anybody preach against X, Y, Z.

So, free speech is in mortal danger, not just in Europe, not just in China, but even in the United States.

And now would be a real good time to pay attention because when free speech goes, it's all over.

Completely.

You mentioned conversion therapy and you did, Jesus is the king of conversion therapy, be confirmed from wherever they are to what he wants them to be but it's that thought that you mentioned Elon Musk.

And of course California and what they are going through there and Elon Musk said that was the reason that he had moved some of his officers or HQs from California and he said he had actually debated with Gavin Newsom for a year how this would be utterly destructive to families.

Now, Elon Musk, he's not a Christian at all, yet he sees the damage to that.

And I've certainly got, as I know you will, Alex, many questions about Elon, the push to the AI push, the Neuralink.

A lot of that is hugely concerning to us. Yet, when you look at Twitter and how that plays into things, he does seem to be someone who's been put here by God for a purpose.

And at the moment, that seems to be to have free conversation online.

Yeah, I think it's a really important point that you're mentioning, Peter.

I think there's a bad habit among some people on our side to attribute to the deep state characteristics and attributes that belong only to God.

And so you hear this a lot.

Well, he must be working with the evildoers because otherwise he wouldn't be allowed to exist.

And we need to, of course, be suspicious of things.

As Ronald Reagan said, you trust, but you verify, you don't just blindly trust somebody, including somebody like Elon Musk. But we don't want to fall into the trap of believing that.

Every single thing that happens is somehow being orchestrated by the deep state, the Council on Foreign Relations and things like that.

And I, for one, am very thankful that Elon Musk has arisen here and really has put a giant target on his back to defend free speech.

It would be much easier for him to just go along, go with the flow, you know, silence people that the ADL and the European Union and the Soviet Poverty Law Center want silence.

And then the advertisers will come back and you'll make more money and things like this.

It would be much easier for him to do that. And yet he has stood firm.

So yeah, of course, we've got questions. Neuralink, very disturbing.

He's involved in a number of government projects that I think people ought to be concerned about.

But on this, we've got to give credit where credit is due.

I actually stopped using X for a while, because it just became a total wasteland. I could post something and just like on Facebook, nobody would even see it.

So, why would I waste my time going there?

But he has really turned that around.

And I'm grateful because this is a way where you can reach millions of people with the truth that otherwise wouldn't have been available to us if Elon Musk had not bought this and taken it in this direction.

Completely.

Alex, I want to pick up.

I mentioned at the beginning you spoke at the World War III conference down in Arizona a couple of weeks ago, and it was the globalist war on freedom.

And that fits into certainly where the US are on the election cycle and the attack on our freedoms everywhere.

And I do think that election is one of the most important elections that we have.

Not that I believe our hope is in politics, but I believe that that is an essential election.

And it pains me to think what could happen to the US if the US are not successfulin electing President Trump.

But this globalist war, do you want to touch on that? We've seen a little bit of that in the last few days by the WHO.

I think James Roguski called it the World Homicide Organization, which I do like.

But then bringing something in, do you want to maybe talk on that?

Because you are extremely educated and understanding on the entities that are at play.

Maybe touch into that and expand on some of that for the viewers.

Well, thank you, Peter.

And there's so many different ways we could take this.

But what I wanted to do with my talk at the World War Three conference that the American Family or the American Freedom Alliance put on was really show that the CCP is not a threat in and of itself that is operating in isolation.

Really, the main takeaway from my talk was that at the highest levels of politics and business and philanthropy in the United States and across the Western world, these are people and organizations that are aiding and abetting openly the most murderous political regime that has ever existed in the history of humanity. The CCP has murdered over 100 million people.

They're of their own people, right?

What do you think they'll do to you if they take power?

They have now weaselled their way into almost absolute control of huge swaths of the architecture of global governance.

You look at the United Abominations, I mean, the United Nations, sorry, keep calling it the United Abominations.

I don't know why.

And they've got 15 specialized agencies. So I did a deep dive into this some years ago in an article for the Epoch Times and looked at these agencies.

Five out of the 15 were run by card carrying members of the Chinese Communist Party, the CCP card carrying members, Chinese nationals who are members of the CCP.

And the CCP says openly that when you are a Communist Party member, you go work in the international institutions, Interpol, Bank for International Settlements, UN, any of the specialized agencies.

You are still obligated to carry out the commands of the CCP.

In fact, the one guy, Meng Hongwei, who was leading Interpol, the self-styled international law enforcement agency, he was arrested when he went back to China. Despite his diplomatic immunity, he was arrested by the CCP.

And they said in their own propaganda media, one of the reasons why is he wasn't faithfully carrying out the orders of the CCP.

So, we have the self-styled global police led by a member of the Chinese Communist Party who was arrested by the CCP for not following their orders faithfully enough.

So you look at that, you look at this architecture of global governance, you look at the incredible support that the CCP has had from Western elites going back actually to before Chairman Mao even took power, right?

Subversives in our government betrayed our ally Chiang Kai-shek, a man who who lost huge numbers of men fighting alongside people like my grandfather against the Japanese in the Pacific.

We betrayed him. In fact, our Secretary of State and later Secretary of Defence George Marshall bragged publicly that he put an arms embargo on Chiang Kai-shek and disarmed his men with the stroke of a pen.

What did that do?

It brought Chairman Mao to power. And then at every step of the way, we built up the CCP. We, I mean, the United States government, the U.S. business community, the World Economic Forum has partnered with them for over four decades now to build them up.

The Rockefeller dynasty very, very openly has been aiding and abetting the CCP.

George Soros, one of the largest financiers of the American political process, on record in an interview with the Financial Times, said the Communist Party of China should own the New World Order in the same way that the United States owned the previous order.

He says the CCP has a better functioning government than the United States of America. This is crazy.

I mean, David Rockefeller bragged in his autobiography published about 10 years before he went to go meet his maker, which I can't imagine went very well.

But he bragged, and in his words, Peter, that he was part of a secret cabal conspiring against the best interests of his country to build a one-world political and economic structure, one-world order, if you will.

He said he's guilty and he's proud of that. So back in the 70s, he wrote in the New York Times that the social experiment under Chairman Mao in China was one of the most important and successful in human history. So the goal of my talk.

Was to show people that, yes, the CCP is a major threat to humanity.

It's a major threat to liberty.

It is a mortal danger to everything that we hold dear, including our freedom.

But you cannot understand the threat of the CCP without understanding that they have massive help from Republicans, from Democrats, from our business community, from Wall Street, from the city of London, from Berlin.

None of this would be happening if it weren't for this kind of subversive effort.

And then to bring it back to the World War Three thing, I do believe, Peter, and people think I'm crazy.

I do believe that we are potentially on the verge of a third world war.

And I don't think it matters that much to the globalists where or how exactly it materializes.

I mean, in one sense, it is an end in and of itself.

They love to see dead people.

They love children growing up without their dad.

They love this kind of stuff because they're wicked.

But it's even more than that.

Look at what happened after World War One.

We got the League of Nations right now.

The U.S. Senate very wisely said we're not participating.

So, they went back to the drawing board.

World War II brought us the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank, the European coal and steel community, which eventually usurped more and more power until it became what I call the European Soviet, the European Union. So at every level, war was incredibly beneficial.

It was the catalyst that allowed global governance to advance like it has.

And they put this on paper.

The U.S. State Department back in the 1970s commissioned a report by a CFR member called Lincoln Bloomfield.

It was called A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations.

And what he says in this report, the goal of the report, the State Department commissioned was to figure out how do we get to a world effectively controlled by the U.N.?

In other words, a world where the nation state is no longer the organizing unit, but where global governance has taken over.

And he concluded almost word for word that war, the threat of war and crises are the fastest catalyst to bring that about.

He said it would take hundreds of years for these trends to organically result in a world controlled by the United Nations.

But he said we can accelerate that process dramatically through war and the threat of war. So we are in major danger of another global conflagration.

The United States, the UK, we have been weakened beyond what anybody can understand. Our Navy is a joke.

Our Air Force can't even keep their jets in the sky anymore without parts made in communist China. So, we're in mortal danger as a civilization, what used to be called Christendom, what used to be called the free world. And we're in mortal danger as a country.

And as Donald Trump's National Security Council director of policy and planning, Rich Higgins, said, we now have an international coalition with high ranking friends in the United States that is determined to destroy the United States, not just as a nation, but even as an ideal.

He said, you've got communists, you've got jihadists, you've got socialists, you've got globalists all working together to destroy the United States.

And so all of it comes together. And folks, we've got to wake up. We've got to pay attention.

This is the future of your children and your grandchildren that we're talking about here.

Oh, it is.

And the globalists have kept those wars going in in Ukraine.

And of course, the West have supplied all the armaments they have on our left with zero. What could go wrong?

Pissing off Russia and giving away all your weapons.

But then the West have armed and given all those resources to Hamas. And the Taliban.

Yeah, I know.

And handed over.

We saw that demonstration of all the weaponry that America handed over.

But you've got all of those happening.

You've got a very weak West militarily. And then you've got President Trump, who seems to speak his mind, who seems to understand, who knows what he wants to do.

He has a vision. That's what you want, a leadership, someone who has a vision.

Then you've got Kamala, who just laughs.

That seems all she does. And she must be the individual that any globalist would want, any of these world entities, because she does seem to be someone who can be controlled.

I mean, we talked about the Russiagate with Trump.

I mean, you look at Kamala and you think anyone could control her, just like anyone could control Joe.

And that seems to be the danger, that she is someone who will be at the control of every foreign entity.

Yeah.

And people need to go back into her history a little bit.

I mean, her start in politics was literally sleeping her way up to the top with political leaders, starting with Willie Brown in San Francisco.

So, imagine how many skeletons are in her closet.

Imagine the levers that you have.

Even if she one day grew a conscience and said, you know what, maybe I don't want to destroy the country that gave me so much.

Maybe, I don't want to completely and utterly annihilate the one nation that has spread the gospel to the whole world, that has brought liberty and the ideas of God given rights to every corner of the planet.

Maybe I changed my mind.

All I got to do is say: oh, yeah, you remember that stuff you were doing back in 1980s, 1992, that party?

Yeah, we've got all the pictures.

You probably wouldn't want that on national TV and on the front page of The Washington Post, would you?

So get back in line.

Do what you're told. Kamala Harris is just the latest puppet. But of course, she does come from this ideological background.

She's what's known as a red diaper baby.

Both of her parents were committed Marxists. So her connections, going back to the earliest parts of her political career, just like Barack Obama, just like Joe Biden, you've got actual Marxist and communist connections at every step of the way, actual globalist connections at every step of the way.

And, you know, these people don't decide policy.

These people are puppets.

They are mouthpieces. They read their teleprompter.

That's why they don't like to do unscripted interviews.

They don't know what they're supposed to say.

And so, folks, our country is in great danger.

Ultimately, we know that God is sovereign.

God will ultimately determine how all this shakes out.

But we've got a part to play.

We've got instructions.

We've got an obligation, not just for ourselves, but for future generations, for our families, for our nations, for our churches to do the right thing.

And we'll just trust God with the results. Just to finish off.

Alex, can I ask you what your kind of, you see your central focus, you talk about a wide range of things, talked about all the global powers, those entities.

We haven't even touched on the danger of CBDCs and that control over the money supply.

We touched on the WHO and monkey pox.

You get so many, and of course, wars happening in many different parts of the world and that instability.

Your role as someone who is there informing the public it's especially over the next couple of months up until November which is vital.

How do you assess where you should put your energies when there's so many crisis happened and you could end up trying to firefight and trying to inform the public on many issues. Where kind of do you see your focus leading up to the election?

You know that's one of the best questions that anybody's ever asked me peter, so thank you for that.

No, really, really, that's such a good question, because there are so many things we could be talking about, right?

My motto as a journalist since I came to know the Lord has always been Ephesians 511, no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them.

And I feel blessed beyond measure that I get to expose the unfruitful works of darkness six days a week, 51 weeks out of the year. Praise the Lord for that.

So, there are a few things that I'm following very closely.

The first is, of course, education, because I believe it's the issue that transcends all the other issues.

So, my latest book, Indoctrinating Our Children to Death, just came out a few months ago. It's endorsed by Kirk Cameron, General Flynn, lots of great Americans, Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North.

So, I go through the history of the public school system. How did we get into this mess?

I do believe, Peter, that this is the most critical issue facing us as individuals, facing us as families, facing us as a church and local church communities, and also facing us as nations and even Western civilization.

This is the one issue where if we fail, everything else is lost.

And I don't mean that to be a doom monger.

I don't mean to exaggerate or to spread fear. It's just the facts.

If we lose 85% of our young children, another generation to this indoctrination happening in the government school system, it doesn't matter who wins the next election. It doesn't matter if we get the border back under control.

It doesn't matter if we rein in the mass killing of children as abortion.

None of those things are going to matter, because they've got the next generation. And we will lose on every one of these fronts going forward.

So, that has been a central focus of mine for over 10 years now.

I do encourage people to, you know, even while we're fighting all these fires, pay attention to the long game.

The other side understood this.

You know, Andrew Breitbart would say that culture is, or that politics is downstream from culture.

And that's absolutely true.

But guess what?

Culture is downstream from education.

So, that's the source of it all.

You know, sometimes Christians say, well, great commission.

Yeah, you're going to disciple the nations while losing your own children.

And explain that one to me.

So, I think that is critical for people to understand the UN is now working on overdrive to take over education around the world.

They've got the world core curriculum. All this is happening now.

And then what's happening at the UN level, Peter, is the other area of focus.

So in September, I'm gonna be going up to New York for the UN Summit of the Future, probably the biggest power grab in UN history since the UN Charter was signed.

This is monumentally important.

Nobody is talking about this.

I actually the first big article I did on this was over a year ago for The Epoch Times.

I called up the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, who you'd think would have some good sense of what's going on in Congress since he oversees the budget of everything that's going on with foreign affairs.

Well, without being too critical, they didn't know much about what was going on.

So, they did, you know, they gave me a statement and we're, we don't like this or whatever.

This is hugely significant. It's the biggest power grab.

Think of it like a constitutional convention for the UN where they want to redo everything, usurp all this power. October, I'll be going down to Columbia for the UN convention on biodiversity.

You know, they, they want you to think this is about saving craters and endangered Pandas or whatever.

No, no, no, no, no.

This is about cataloguing all of the genetic code of every organism on the planet, mixing and matching it, giving it to biotech and biopharmaceutical companies to come up with new concoctions, genetically engineering all of your food and even your babies. And all this can be discerned just from reading their documents.

And then of course, in November, I am to be in Azerbaijan for the UN Climate Summit.

The climate fraud is of course the pretext that underpins so much of the tyranny that is coming down on us around the world. And then of course, January, I'll be God willing in Switzerland for the World Economic Forum and then India for a ministry project.

So, a lot of international travel in the months ahead, but I'm really keeping laser focused on what the globalists are doing through the UN and the architecture of global governance and what they're doing to our children through the government schools, because unfortunately not enough people are covering those.

We've got plenty of people covering the election, the politics, not enough people are covering those things.

So, that's what I'm going to focus on, like a laser beam for at least the next six months, Peter.

Well, there's a lot there. And obviously you can follow Alex on Twitter handle and obviously libertysentinel.org.

And that book, Indoctrinating Our Children to Death, Government, Schools, War and Faith, Family Freedom and How to Stop It.

And just on the front, Kirk Franklin says, I must read for everyone who wants to protect children, families, churches and the nation.

So, I put that to you, but Alex as always, I appreciate your time giving us an overview of what is happening worldwide.

And also what you're spending your time and energies on. So, thank you so much for joining us today.

Thanks, It's an honour and a blessing.