Sexually explicit material has always challenged censors
and traditional moralists. From the 1960s, liberal values on sex and
sexual relationships became one of the markers of a civilised, modern
society. Over the past decade, however, there’s a gnawing unease that
sexually explicit material has gradually stepped down from the top shelf
and into the mainstream. Whether it was Rihanna’s raunchy display on The X Factor,
Jonathan Ross’ lewd chat shows or Katie Perry simulating oral sex in
pop videos, porno...
Sexually explicit material has always challenged censors
and traditional moralists. From the 1960s, liberal values on sex and
sexual relationships became one of the markers of a civilised, modern
society. Over the past decade, however, there’s a gnawing unease that
sexually explicit material has gradually stepped down from the top shelf
and into the mainstream. Whether it was Rihanna’s raunchy display on The X Factor,
Jonathan Ross’ lewd chat shows or Katie Perry simulating oral sex in
pop videos, pornographic imagery has become the wallpaper of
twenty-first-century society. With the rise of the increasingly
ubiquitous ‘celebrity sex tape’, fans of chart-friendly pop stars such
as Tulisa Contostavlos are exposed to increasingly graphic and intimate
depictions of their icons. And then there’s Fifty Shades of Grey.
Traditional moralists have always found much to censor in modern
society, but when former champions of sexual liberalism, such as Joan
Bakewell, start bemoaning the onslaught of naked flesh into the living
room, something appears to have changed. Indeed, it is fortysomething
ex-punk journalists turned parents who have started to wonder aloud why
thong-thrusting pop videos are being shown at lunchtime.
But could it be argued that we’ve been here many times before? From
Elvis Presley and David Bowie to Madonna and Prince, pop stars have
sought to challenge and question society’s taboos around sex. Surely
Rihanna and Perry are simply the latest practitioners of taboo busting
exhibitionism? Or is it the case that sex and relationships have become
devalued, with porn aesthetics the new low-grade currency? A civilised
society should be open about sex, but are we in danger of forgetting
that civilised values also means the separation of the public and
private, the decent and the debased? Is the rush to smash sexual taboos a
sign of healthy libertarianism or of self-loathing by a cultural elite
unwilling and unable to promote higher culture? Are the sexual-taboo
smashers really hammering elite traditionalists and conservatives or is
it a radical way of sneering at ordinary people’s ‘small minded’ values?
Neil Davenportwriter; head of sociology, JFS Sixth Form Centre; contributor,
spikedDr Jan Macvarishresearch
fellow, Centre for Health Services Studies; founding associate, Centre
for Parenting Culture Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury
Anna Percyfeminist
performance poet; member, Stirred Feminist Poetry collective; organiser
and facilitator, live poetry events and writing workshops
Chair:
Suzy Dean
freelance writer; blogger,
Free Society
View more