PREP Podcaster - ”Success Favours The PREPared Mind”
News:News Commentary
January 31, 2024 - Participants include:
Dr. Karen Alpert - @FixTheTaxTreaty
Dr. Laura Snyder - @TAPInternation
John Richardson - @Expatriationlaw
The purpose of SEAT has been and continues to be to conduct research (including the SEAT survey), prepare position papers, make submissions by SEAT to various governments, facilitate advocacy by individuals impacted, file amicus briefs and provide a centre for educating interested parties about the U.S. extra-territorial tax regime. (SEAT's work may be found on the SEAT website.)
SEAT believes that the problems caused to Americans abroad by the U.S. extraterritorial tax regime can be ended ONLY by severing citizenship from tax residency. We encourage the United States to join the rest of the world by taxing individuals on the basis of residence and source and NOT based on the citizenship of an individual.
Part of SEAT's work has been break our research into specific issues and categories. These categories are expressed as "SEAT Working Papers". In order to make the "SEAT Working Papers" available in podcast form, SEAT co-founders Karen Alpert, Laura Snyder and John Richardson are developing a series of podcasts - featuring interactive discussion - where we distill the "working paper" into conversational format. It is our hope that these podcasts will make SEAT's content available to a larger group of people.
______________________________________________
SEAT Working Paper Series #2023/7 Extraterritorial Taxation #7: Inherently SuspectThe U.S. extraterritorial tax system is subject to strict scrutiny – the highest level of equal protection scrutiny. As such, it is “inherently suspect,” in violation of 14th Amendment equal protection.
Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4465558.
The following description has been generated by AI ...
______________________________________
Welcome to Episode 7, a pivotal part of our comprehensive dialogue on citizenship taxation, hosted by John Richardson. In this enlightening episode, we delve deep into the law of equal protection and examine how citizenship taxation interplays with this fundamental principle.
Our conversation focuses on the role of nationality, race, and alienage in deciphering whether laws exhibit prejudice and antipathy. Laura brings forth critically acclaimed cases that throw light on why discrimination based on nationality and the country of origin is deemed unlawful without a strong justification. The episode further scrutinizes the U.S. Extraterritorial Tax System's potential bias effects depending on an individual's nationality.
Sit back and join us as we explore the law's specific terms, the pressing government interests, and the dissimilarities between a general assumption of equality and concrete reasons justifying the present situation. Listen in for a better comprehension of inherently suspect laws, including nationality-based discrimination.
This academic discussion dissects historical rulings and current opinions about citizenship-based taxation from various courts of justice, including the Supreme Court of Canada and the Federal Court of Canada. We also probe into how citizenship-based taxation transformed from a mere prerequisite for employment eligibility into a governmental tool for behavior control.
Moreover, we examine how taxation, a topic primarily associated with revenue generation, intertwines with justice, fairness, and societal organization. Finally, we touch on the controversy surrounding nationality-based taxes in the US and the financial implications of the American extraterritorial taxation policy on overseas American citizens, stimulating thoughts on a need for policy reform.
Time To Retire The Term ”Citizenship Taxation”: Better To Call It Taxation Based On Circumstances Of Birth
The US Supreme Court FBAR Decision in Bittner: The Morning After
U.S. District Court: Green Card Holders May Be Able To Rely On Tax ”Treaty Escape Hatch” To Avoid Mr. FBAR
Canada’s Underused Housing Tax Unites US And Canadian Residents In Opposition To Citizenship Tax
How The US Is Incentivizing Americans Abroad To Renounce US Citizenship
If We Don’t Hang Together, We Will Hang Separately - How Americans Abroad Divide Themselves
Paying Tax On Income Never Received: The Moores, The 965 Transition Tax, Foreign Corps and Subpart F
Redefining US Citizenship Tax: Taxation Based On Circumstances Of Birth Instead Of Circumstances Of Life (applied to people who don’t live in the USA)
FBAR Penalties - US v. Molyneux - The Next Opportunity To Argue The Excessive Fines Clause
@MiAzhikwan - The Importance Of Truth - The Second Lesson
H.R. 25 - ”The Fair Tax” - Will Be Voted On In The House - Taxation Is Too Important To Be Left To The Political Parties
US Supreme Court Denies Toth FBAR Cert Petition Refusing To Decide Whether Penalties Violate ”Excessive Fines Clause” Of 8th Amendment
Four Attitudes Of Americans Abroad Toward US Citizen Tax: Ending, Ignoring, Escaping Or Improving
Why Tax Reform For Americans Abroad Is Reminiscent Of The Movie Groundhog Day
Dr. Don Young Discusses: Jordan Peterson And The Ontario College Of Psychologists of Ontario
Notice 2023-11: A Significant Escalation of FATCA Enforcement On Foreign Banks and Americans Abroad
There Are Two Kinds Of People Who Need A Second Citizenship: The Rich And The Poor
Financial Planning For Americans Abroad In Israel with Aaron Katsman
Ms. Molyneux Meets Mr. FBAR On Fifth Avenue In New York
What If You Want To Plan For Your Financial Future, But Simply Don’t Know Where To Begin?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The Tucker Carlson Podcast
The Matt Walsh Show
The Glenn Beck Program
Mark Levin Podcast
The Michael Knowles Show