S7E9: Mand Modality Preference Assessments among High- and Low-Tech Options for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review with Matthew O’Brien & Joel Ringdahl

Matthew O’Brien & Joel Ringdahl join us to talk about their paper, Mand Modality Preference Assessments among High- and Low-Tech Options for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review.

 

Show Notes

 

• Remember to join us on Facebook to suggest articles to review and questions for authors.
  • https://www.facebook.com/BApractice
• Acknowledgments
  • Host and Executive Producer: Cody Morris, Ph.D., BCBA-D, LBA
    • https://salve.edu/users/dr-cody-morris
  • Assistant Producers
    • Megan Ellsworth
    • Jesse Perrin
  • Organizational Support
    • ABAI
      • https://www.abainternational.org/welcome.aspx
    • Behavior Analysis in Practice
      • Editor, Stephanie Peterson, Ph.D., BCBA-D, LBA
      • https://www.abainternational.org/journals/bap.aspx
    • Music
      • Cruising Altitude by Jim Carr and his band New Latitude
        • http://www.newlatitudemusic.com
      • Link to Article:
        • Mand Modality Preference Assessments among High- and Low-Tech Options for Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Systematic Review | Behavior Analysis in Practice (springer.com)

 

 

References

 

Adami, S., Falcomata, T. S., Muething, C. S., & Hoffman, K. (2017). An evaluation of lag schedules of reinforcement during functional communication training: Effects on varied mand responding and challenging behavior. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 10(3), 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-017-0179-7

 

O'Brien, M. J., Pauls, A. M., Schieltz, K. M., McComas, J. J., & Ringdahl, J. E. (2023). Mand modality preference assessments among high- and low-tech options for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 17(1), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00829-6

 

Ringdahl, J. E., Berg, W. K., Wacker, D. P., Ryan, S., Ryan, A., Crook, K., & Molony, M. (2016). Further demonstrations of individual preference among mand modalities during functional communication training. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 28(6), 905–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-016-9518-9

 

Ringdahl, J. E., Berg, W. K., Wacker, D. P., Crook, K., Molony, M. A., Vargo, K. K., Neurnberger, J. E., Zabala, K., & Taylor, C. J. (2018). Effects of response preference on resistance to change. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,109(1), 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.308

Ringdahl, J.E., Schieltz, K. M., O’Brien, M. J., McComas, J. Morlino, R. M., Zabala-Snow, K. A., Unholz-Bowden, Emily K., & Girtier, S. N. (2024). Communication modality preference and the social validity of functional communication and man training. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-024-09956-6

 

Winborn-Kemmerer, L., Ringdahl, J. E., Wacker, D. P., & Kitsukawa, K. (2009). A demonstration of individual preference for novel mands during functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(1), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-185.