#57 Why Law School’s Third Year Should Be Eliminated

In this episode of Lawyers Who Learn, David Schnurman, CEO of Lawline, interviews Jordan Furlong, founder of Law21 and one of the legal profession's most influential voices on reform and the future of lawyering. This conversation tackles the fundamental questions facing legal education and the profession itself: Why do we have lawyers? What value do they provide? And how should we form competent practitioners in an AI-driven world? Jordan challenges the core assumptions of legal education, arguing that law school has become nothing more than an expensive credentialing institution that fails to prepare lawyers for actual practice. He advocates for eliminating the third year of law school entirely, describing it as a "massive waste of time" that adds unnecessary debt without educational value. Drawing from successful models in England and Wales, Jordan envisions a system where students can become lawyers without traditional law degrees, focusing instead on competency-based assessment and apprenticeship-style learning. The discussion explores the coming identity crisis for the legal profession as AI reshapes what lawyers do day-to-day. Jordan predicts that most traditional legal work will be automated, forcing lawyers to redefine their value proposition around human connection, judgment, and trusted guidance rather than document production and analysis. The conversation also examines unauthorized practice of law as a "protectionist scam" that AI will render obsolete, emphasizing the urgent need to shift from lawyer-centric to client-centered service delivery.