This is one of the papers from our 2017 Annual Conference, the Future of Phenomenology. Information and the full conference booklet can be found at www.britishphenomenology.org.uk
The question regarding the pertinence of using Heidegger’s analytic of Dasein as a guide for empirical research arises from contemporary attempts to bring Heideggerian phenomenology and cognitive science together. I will focus on one of the main figures behind these attempts, Hubert Dreyfus. I will start by showing that Dreyfus argues in favour of the idea that Heideggerian phenomenology can be naturalized and made continuous with scientific research on the basis of two implicit premises: (a) the interpretation of the analytic of Dasein as a regional ontology; and (b) an account of the relation between phenomenology and science as a relation that holds between two disciplines of the same kind, but that stand at different levels. The aim of this paper is to show that it is not possible to defend these premises on Heideggerian grounds. I will do so by analysing Heidegger’s considerations regarding anthropology, psychology, and biology, and their difference with the analytic of Dasein. I will argue that the main difference can be found in Heidegger’s definition of phenomenological concepts (i.e. formal indications). Finally, I will argue that, although Dreyfus fails to take into account the nature of phenomenological concepts as a relevant methodological matter, his project of naturalization raises a valid concern regarding the possibility of taking Heidegger’s ontology back to a relation with the ontic sciences.
Filipa Melo Lopes - ‘“Half Victim, Half Accomplice”: Cat Person and Narcissism’
Kata Dóra Kiss - ‘The Importance of Intersubjectivity in the Process of Psychotherapy’
Rachel Elliott - ‘The Futurity of the “We”: A Merleau-Pontian Account of Group Temporality and Improvised Music’
Francesca Brencio - ‘Shifting the paradigm. Neurosciences and the phenomenological challenge’
Valeria Bizzari - ‘A multidisciplinary analysis of autism: predictive engagement and the living body’
Prisca Bauer - ‘Engaged phenomenology: neurology beyond the brain’
Dan Zahavi - ‘Pure and Applied Phenomenology’
Luna Dolezal - Interviewed by Jessie Stanier & Hannah Berry
Keith Crome - Education as Child’s Play
Hannah Berry - Empathy: the border between narratives
Francesca Brencio - “Fill the gap”. A phenomenological perspective of exercising psychiatry
William Large - Atheism of the Word: A Genealogy of the Concept of God
Pablo Andreu - Death as an “Ontological Infidelity”
Marco Di Feo - The Human Right to Family Reunification
Botsa Katara - Reassessing the Super-crip Stereotype
Pablo Fernandez Velasco - Disorientation and Self-consciousness: A Phenomenological Inquiry
Andreas Sandner - ‘Visible Odours? On the Issue of Visuocentricism in “Olfactory Austerity”
Matteo Valdarchi - The circle and the origin. An interpretation of Heidegger's Habilitationsschrift
Katherine Burn - Recalibrating the Contemporary: Reading the phenomenology of shame in Metamodernism
Dylan Trigg - Who is the Subject of Birth?
Join Podbean Ads Marketplace and connect with engaged listeners.
Advertise Today
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Positive Thinking Mind
In the Great Khan’s Tent
Visualize Meditations
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast