The provided text explores the evolving relationship between the Supreme Court and the U.S. Presidency, focusing on how the judiciary defines and constrains executive power. It traces the origins of judicial review over the executive through landmark cases like Marbury v. Madison and examines the Court's shifting stance on the President's domestic authority, particularly concerning the Commander-in-Chief powers and the power to appoint and remove officials. The document further investigates the Court's traditional deference in foreign affairs and national security, contrasting it with recent interventions in "terror cases" that established due process rights in wartime. Finally, it discusses the development of executive privilege and presidential immunity, highlighting recent decisions such as Trump v. United States and Trump v. CASA, Inc., which significantly reshape the landscape of presidential accountability and the judiciary's ability to challenge executive actions.
Research done with the help of artificial intelligence, and presented by two AI-generated hosts.