More straight talking as Dr Niall McCrae returns to Hearts of Oak for an hour of news driven chat and discussion, giving his unbridled opinions on some of the top stories bouncing around this week on the web, in the papers and on social media. Topics and articles going under the microscope this week are...- Hate not Hope release their most recent report 'Rhetoric, Racism and Resentment' including Hearts of Oak amongst others.- Lineker Tweets: Presenters revolt for overpaid, jug eared BBC propaganda...
More straight talking as Dr Niall McCrae returns to Hearts of Oak for an hour of news driven chat and discussion, giving his unbridled opinions on some of the top stories bouncing around this week on the web, in the papers and on social media.
Topics and articles going under the microscope this week are...
- Hate not Hope release their most recent report 'Rhetoric, Racism and Resentment' including Hearts of Oak amongst others.
- Lineker Tweets: Presenters revolt for overpaid, jug eared BBC propaganda tool.
- China Announces lockdown plans for the flu as Washington Post tells Americans to prepare for the same.
- Russell Brand and how the left will eat themselves.
- Corporate consumerism: Making us more dependent and less resilient while 'verging on extortion.'
- The BBC (Biased Broadcasting Caliphate) welcome all the haters and conspiracy theorists back to Twitter.
- ULEZ London: Cameras vandalised amid backlash against expansion.
- Civil War at the New York Times! Older, liberal veterans Vs the younger, woke staff over the papers coverage of the trans issue.
- Silent Prayer: Pro-life advocate arrested again for ‘thoughtcrime’ near abortion clinic.
- Matt Hancock, COVID strains and 'frightening the pants' off the public.
- Telegraph Misrepresents Ofcom Ruling Against Mark Steyn.
Dr Niall McCrae is an officer for ‘Covid coercion in the workplace’ for the Workers of England trade union, the only union standing up for workers' rights and freedoms in the UK during these troubled times.
From 2010 to 2021 he was a senior lecturer in mental health at King’s College London, and he continues to write on mental health matters.
He was also a senior researcher for David Kurten and Peter Whittle on the London Assembly.
His publications include several books including ‘Moralitis: a Cultural Virus’ (with Robert Oulds), ‘The Moon and Madness’, ‘Echoes from the Corridors’ (with Peter Nolan) and ‘The Year of the Bat’ (with MLR Smith).
He is a regular contributor to Unity News Network, Gateway Pundit, Lockdown Sceptics, The Salisbury Review and The Light.
Follow Niall on Gab @Dr_Niall_McCrae
https://www.workersofengland.co.uk/
For our listeners in the US, do check out our friends at https://guncat5.com/ 'Firearms training for women, by women'
Originally broadcast live 11.3.23
*Special thanks to Bosch Fawstin for recording our intro/outro on this podcast.
Check out his art https://theboschfawstinstore.blogspot.com/ and follow him on GETTR https://gettr.com/user/BoschFawstin
To sign up for our weekly email, find our social media, podcasts, video, livestreaming platforms and more...
https://heartsofoak.org/connect/
Please subscribe, like and share!
Links to this episodes talking points...
Hate not Hope
https://hopenothate.org.uk/2023/02/26/state-of-hate-2023-rhetoric-racism-and-resentment/
Lineker
https://gab.com/TommyRobinsonOfficial/posts/110001603574903499
Lockdown
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/03/10/china-announces-lockdown-plans-for-the-flu-as-washington-post-prepares-americans-for-the-same/
Russell Brand
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/mar/10/russell-brand-politics-public-figures-responsibility
See you Soon
https://countrysquire.co.uk/2023/03/09/see-you-soon-the-showrooms-polite-warning/
Twitter
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-64554381.amp
ULEZ
https://gab.com/Dr_Niall_McCrae/posts/109993951077560823
New York Times
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/03/07/civil-war-at-the-new-york-times/
Silent prayer
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/mar/6/isabel-vaughan-spruce-again-arrested-thoughtcrime-/
Hancock
https://www.itv.com/news/2023-03-05/need-to-frighten-the-pants-off-public-with-new-covid-strain-matt-hancock-said
Mark Steyn
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/03/06/telegraph-misrepresents-ofcom-ruling-against-mark-steyn/
[0:22] Dr. Niall McCrae, thank you so much and sorry for keeping you waiting in the green room. You're live now.
it's quite comfortable in here.
I'm sorry. There's lots of right-wing books to read in this room.
I'm sorry that I didn't supply you tea and coffee and drinks, but one day we'll have a proper green room to do that. Can I just, there was one comment on the side.
Shelley Marlow said, I think she said, oh, Robert Malone. that's just weird, because I've seen people talk about controlled opposition. If that's a controlled opposition was, I wanted. The guy is absolutely genuine. I talked to him and his wife, what they're doing, all the work they've done. They were probably, probably the most genuine people
[1:09] that I've met in some of my travels. They were hospitable. They opened up their house to me, they told me to stay as long as I wanted and just a wonderful couple. So don't believe the lies that only some of us are pure and the rest are all. There may be people in this for other reasons, but I think Robert Malone is not one of those. He is absolutely genuine.
Anyway, we have enough stories and my sincere apologies for taking so much of Niall's time.
You can of course find Niall on gab, that is, and we've taken most of the stories from his Gab account tonight.
That said, let's jump in with our first story.
It is Hate Not Hope have got a wonderful report. I love Hate Not Hope's annual report on the state of Hate, rhetoric, racism and resentment.
It is an absolute honour for us here at Hearts of Oak to be in that.
I thank Hate Not Hope so much for mentioning us and for showing us that things were doing well and not doing well and we will get a full page spread next time.
That is our goal, a full paid spread in Hate Not Hope.
[2:27] But Niall tell us about this because this obviously tries to target those of us sensible ones supposedly on the right.
Many people mentioned are absolutely fantastic people. Some of them seem to be some Nazis.
It's a whole mix really is.
[2:47] Yeah, tell us about Hate Not Hope or this report or kind of what they highlight.
Well, I think you could take two approaches to this Hate Not Hope, sorry, it's the other way around, isn't it? Hope Not Hate report.
I always get it mixed up.
Yeah, well, of course, it is all about hate, really. These are the most hateful people, the most intolerant, woke Puritans.
And I think that the first approach that you can take is just to find it all very amusing and to see it as a badge of honor.
I mean, I saw that in the gallery of far-right extremists, there was a rather fetching picture of yourself, Peter.
And there were also some other outlets. In fact, most of the outlets I write for
[3:45] were in this Hate Not Hope report, including the conservative woman.
I mean, Unity News Network, none of this, of course, is justifiable, but you can understand some of their websites are a bit more forthright, but conservative women are much more careful what they say.
But also in amongst them was Richard Tice of the Reform Party.
And so just as you said a few moments ago, Peter, there is such a crazy mix of people of all anywhere to the right of the spectrum.
And I think what the intention
[4:32] is here is to by associating Richard Tice with you know some real kind of far-right extremists because there are far-right extremists in that report. I think the intention is to warn people like Richard Tice, GB News, Nigel Farage, and in fact, anyone who follows Richard Tice, Reform Party, Nigel Farage and so on, that they are dabbling in, they're on a slippery slope, really to far right extremism. But I think the second approach is, and I guess what I would
[5:24] recommend is a combination of two. The first is to extract some humour from it and to be quite pleased that you've got this free publicity. But the second approach is that that this is actually a dangerous organization.
[5:45] They're well-funded by the establishment. This report will be sitting on every MP's desk, and it will have an impact.
Now, obviously people in that report will have been well used to being canceled over the last three years or more on social media and other outlets.
But that is just a thin end of the wedge. The disinformation industry is really ramping up, and the hate industry is really ramping up.
And we see these bills going through Parliament.
There's going to be a lot more clamping down on people who are in that report.
Well, let's go to another hateful figure and that is Mr. Lineker.
And here he is. Pro Jam, can you just scroll down so we get the full..
[6:49] Yep, so scroll down. Scroll down, down, down. Yes, revolt for Lineker.
And I don't know if those of you will be watching the match today.
I won't because Liverpool lost 1-0 so I'll certainly not be watching them.
But they've all walked out. But it's him comparing what the UK government are doing to the Nazis.
And this is on immigration.
I guess you've no love lost for Mr. Gary Lineker, Neil.
[7:20] Well, if you are a fan of Match of the Day on Saturday evenings, I think you'll be going without tonight. I think they've cancelled it, haven't they?
And, you know, this is Lineker and Chums holding the viewing public to ransom with their political ideology.
I saw Ian Wright defending Gary Lineker when he actually praised the sacking of some other pundits from Match of the Day.
He said nothing about Matt Le Tissier. when Matt Le Tissier was, you know, shown the door because of his comments about, I think, footballers collapsing after having the vaccine. So nothing, this isn't really about free speech. These people have got no principles at all. If they did, they would have been speaking out about all the other people that have been cancelled by the BBC over the years.
[8:38] No, this is simply that they are part of the, that they follow the same narrative.
[8:44] As Gary Lineker. They think that speaking out in favour of refugees, that that's self-promotion.
And I wish Gary Lineker, when he talks about these people coming across the English channel as the most vulnerable people in society, I wish that he would consider the vulnerability, of girls and young women who live in the proximity of these hotels that are putting up these undocumented male migrants who shouldn't be in the country. And isn't it funny how the likes of Gary Lineker were so anti-Brexit, so pro-EU. These people have fled from the EU. You know, that might be, that's not where they've come from originally, but that is a country that they have been so desperate to escape from, France and the European Union. So it doesn't sound like Gary has got much of an opinion of rights and compassion in the European Union, does it?
Why don't we send them all back to the EU and send Gary Lineker
[10:10] on the same ship, yeah? Because the British public is getting more and more resentful of these
[10:20] rich, smug, arrogant celebrities, cocking a snoop at ordinary people whose lives are genuinely, being affected in all kinds of adverse ways by these migrants being dispersed all around the country.
People have had weddings cancelled, hotels have sacked their staff, and these migrants are on the streets and we know what's going on in Britain and Ireland at the moment.
We know what's been going on with the abuse of young girls, and that's not necessarily refugees that were doing that, but it was, you know, again, perpetrators were the sorts of people that Gary would call the victims, or the vulnerable people.
You know, people that actually sexually abuse our daughters, and Gary Lineker calls them vulnerable.
[11:24] Oh, exactly. Yeah. Well, now we've paid half a billion to the French to look after it.
I'm sure everything will be fixed, but that's a whole other issue which we won't touch on.
Projam, can you bring up the next one on China announces, China announces lockdown plans for the flu as Washington Post tells Americans to prepare for the same.
And it is this, let me break this story here.
That is the, the daily sceptic, which is becoming better and better.
And Toby Young seems to be becoming more and more red-pilled, which is interesting.
But yeah, they're all seemingly getting ready and Washington Post had the same for Americans.
It seems to be their preparedness for something that's incoming Niall.
Well, of course, I mean, COVID-19 was a trial run, I think, for what's coming next.
[12:21] I don't fully agree with your comment about daily sceptic becoming,
[12:30] You know, there's that podcast that Toby Young does for James Dellingpole called London Calling and people say they're either on Team Toby or Team James. I think Toby is a long, long way from Team James. He still believes in the cock-up theory rather than the conspiracy theory that James believes in. But yes, there is some very good stuff on Daily Sceptic.
And it's a brilliant library, if you like, of everything that's gone on over the last three years.
If you want to search for any information about COVID, then Daily Sceptic is such a fantastic resource.
But this particular piece, Washington Post supporting the idea of future lockdowns, and they're not even saying that this would be for a deadly new pathogen necessarily.
It could just be that there's a bad strain of flu. So no lessons have been learned.
But of course, this isn't about learning lessons. The Washington Post and the whole
[13:52] COVID-19 regime, they knew that lockdowns don't stop an airborne respiratory virus any more than masks are a prevention. They know all this, but it's because lockdowns allow them to take huge strides forward with their project. And if you think back to 2020, just how much was done in that short space of time. For example, 5G aerials was put up all around the country during that time when you weren't really allowed out of your house.
Yeah, no, completely, completely. Let's go to Russell Brand. Pro Jam, can you bring up the next one? I once admired Russell Brand. This is weird because I've gone the other way. I once hated Russell Brand. I thought he was just a sex-crazed junkie.
I don't know whether he is or not, but this is The Guardian. Obviously they once admired Russell Brand, but his grim trajectory shows us where politics is heading. Interesting how I've got opposite thoughts about it. But yeah, he's obviously gained a lot of popularity. I've got some questions around it but a lot of stuff he puts out is is bang on the money. What are your thoughts?
Well, I would say to all viewers that,
[15:22] you know, usually it'd be like extracting your own teeth reading Guardian comment articles.
But this one is so bad that it's good. Believe me, it's well worth a read. And there's too much to unpack in the time that we've got. But Russell Brand has really gone a long way in George Monbiot's perspective from where he should be. But actually, I think Russell Brand hasn't changed as much as the Guardian and George Monbiot have changed.
I mean, they've moved ever further away from thinking about what ordinary people want, to pushing this totalitarian net zero technocracy.
[16:21] And Russell Brand, he speaks to a young audience, people who like freedom, that hasn't changed.
I think he was always speaking to a fairly sort of liberal, I mean, okay, in the past, he was probably more woke than he is now. And like you like you say, I can watch Russell Brand now when I couldn't really before. But really, George Monbiot's article is just such good fun to read. I mean, everything that's going on in the world that we know is wrong.
The central digital currency, the lockdowns, the COVID vaccines and denial of the injuries, digital surveillance, the Dutch farmers, all these sorts of things.
According to George Monbiot, they are conspiracy theories that Russell Brand is dabbling in.
So what you see in this article is just one long dribble of denial
[17:37] by George Monbiot of what's really going on. And George Monbiot is also saying that he's very worried about the way politics is going. And that's interesting to the likes of you and me, Peter, isn't it? Because, you know, we wouldn't be human if we didn't get pessimistic about things.
But it's interesting to hear George Monbiot, the way that he, you know, reading the tea leaves, if you like, he sees things getting a lot worse for his side. And just very recently, three weeks ago, I think, I was at Oxford for a rally against the road closures for net zero by Oxford City Council against the wishes of the local residents. And it was a massive turn up. People came around from all over the country, 10 to 20,000 there. And George Monbiot lives in Oxford and he was seething with rage at what he saw that day. It was terrible for him. This was his home city.
[18:42] And it was all these conspiracy theorists had come from near or far. So he's quite a worried man, is George Monbiot.
I'm glad you brought some joy to him. It's always good to bring joy to the the Guardianistas help them out in their struggle against reality.
Let's move on to a piece you wrote.
Let me just mention once again, guncat5.com. Go there.
As I said, part of the parallel economy. And they haven't paid me a cent for this.
I just enjoyed being with them. Go and you can sign up to their newsletter.
And also if you want to get merch, I would encourage you to do that.
[19:23] Over here, this is an article that you've put together, Neil, on Country Square magazine.
If you can scroll down Pro Jam, it's a really interesting article, See you soon, the showroom's polite warning.
It's about sustainability and I guess if the industry actually were green in any way, they would promote cars that last longer than a three-year warranty.
That's kind of the overview. about this article Neil?
Yeah well I think there's two messages here. One is that you know we are opposing this new normal that the globalists want to impose on us but I think the last three years of Covid has shown, you know, certainly someone like myself who wasn't really very alert to what was going on until Covid.
[20:20] It shows us that the old normal wasn't very good either. There were lots of things going wrong, and some of that was things that are creeping towards where we've got now. But this article is more about the corporate consumerism and how products are deliberately made not to last. And and it's been going on for a long time, but it's got steadily worse as, you know.
[20:52] Computer tested components are made to last a very precise lifetime.
And, you know, this started sort of infamously with planned obsolescence in the American motor industry in the 1950s, where they changed the model every year.
And then they started putting on more more ridiculous wings and tail fins on the car. And incidentally, the editor of Country Squire has chosen what often comes up on an internet search. If you search Country Squire, you don't get the magazine top on Google, you get this American car called the Country Squire. And that's in the picture there is a Ford Country Squire from the late 1960s. Perhaps he could have chosen one with with the fins and wings from the late fifties.
But anyway, the other point though, which is what you're touched on already, is that we have all these greenies lecturing us, hectoring us about the need for sustainability.
Well, why aren't they
[22:06] doing something about this corporate scam, because it is a scam, really. They could make products last for a lot longer than they do. And instead, things are lasting less and less time than ever. So we need to keep replacing them. We need to keep getting new stuff, mostly from China. You know, it has shipped all the way from China, made in sweatshops. I mean, this is not sustainability.
So why aren't the so-called environmentalists making more of this, rather than trying to police every single aspect of yours and my lives?
[22:50] Exactly. Exactly. Let's move on to Twitter. Projam, can you bring up the haters and conspiracy theorists back on Twitter?
This is something the BBC had been working on and I'm not sure exactly why they had been working on it.
It does seem as though they have a special unit.
But this talks about the haters and conspiracy theorists back on Twitter and it's written by the disinformation team.
I thought all the BBC was the disinformation team but obviously only part of it is the disinformation team.
But they go and they talk all different people complain about Andrew Tate, complain about those who say that, stop the stealing, about saying the election was stolen in 2020.
Mike Lindell talk about Robert Malone.
And yeah, what were your thoughts? That disinformation, not really struck me.
[23:51] It's interesting how the with the Gary Lineker story we mentioned earlier that there are all these people according to social media today who are cancelling their TV license because of Gary Lineker being kind of temporarily suspended from match of the day for his Nazi comments.
I think that's just a cover up for the fact that the BBC is losing more and more people all the time.
And I think some of those people are cancelling their TV license because of the latest nonsense from Gary Lineker. I was on a train home yesterday, I just heard three ladies who were in their 50s, ordinary sort of women and they were saying
[24:46] Why does the BBC have people like him saying such nonsense? They're probably the people that will still carry on paying the license anyway, but hopefully UK based viewers
[25:01] on Hearts of Oak, if you haven't cancelled your TV license already, you really need to do it.
You don't need the BBC. The BBC hates you.
This is the thing. It's got this disinformation T
All these people on good salaries paid for by your TV license.
You are paying to be spied on and attacked by these people.
And I saw that article a few days ago, Peter, and as you say, it's written by the disinformation team.
If you go to the bottom of the article, you'll see there's about 10 or 12 names.
And the article itself is really flimsy. I mean, you or I, Peter, could write such a piece in about 10 minutes flat.
It's really flimsy. It mentions Andrew Tate, and that's about all.
And yet all these people are being paid to produce this guff.
So please, anyone that's still paying, just cancel it.
You don't need the BBC. And the BBC doesn't need you either, because unfortunately, the money that they're losing, from hundreds of thousands of people leaving the TV license fee.
[26:25] The government's quite willing to pay instead, just like they're paying for the newspapers, because authoritarian regimes love media, don't they?
That's how they get their message across. So the BBC isn't gonna die, But why should you pay?
[26:42] Why should you pay to have this constant barrage of anti-conservative, anti-traditional,
They really don't like the ordinary British people much at all.
[27:01] Yeah, no completely. We will move on this here, which was from your gab and it's telegraph, which obviously is often difficult to get because it's behind a paywall.
This kind of connects with the Oxford thing. Someone said on the chat, HW Logan said, did the protest in Oxford help at all?
Well, it's about applying pressure.
All these things are applying pressure. It's never just a one off.
But this is ULEZ cameras.
Is the ultra-low emission zone, vandalized amid backlash against zone expansion. And there's a camera, you can see cut, the cable's cut, and you can see the front, not on that, the fronts are kind of blacked out. And yeah, it's a fight back against this control, isn't it Neil?
Yeah, and obviously I'm not going to incite crime on the show tonight, but I think my only comment on this, Peter, would be to quote from Thomas Jefferson.
[28:13] 'When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty'
[28:24] Very interesting. It's interesting how technology is used and that control has been used in different ways throughout the centuries, but now it's more insidious and invasive.
Let's move on to, let me bring this is, what is our next? Our next is Civil War at the New York Times.
A daily sceptic once again, who I think would be worse off without them, but they could be a lot better. I agree completely with your thoughts earlier.
[29:01] I was giving some slack to Toby Young who I think deserves criticism and praise in equal measure.
But this is civil war at the New York Times. This is the clash they talk about between the older liberal veterans, or how it's termed here, and its younger woke staff over the coverage of the trans issue.
[29:28] I wonder whether it's that. I don't think every young person wants to chop off bits of children and sexually abuse them in that way. So I think that's probably over-egging it, that split.
But it's I guess good to see the liberal media, the established media, the mainstream media actually up in arms with themselves over these issues.
Well, sometimes people can be quite flabbergasted by this woke momentum that doesn't seem to stop.
You know, you get these stories every now and again, oh, they've gone too far this time. But no, they keep going because there isn't any real strong and meaningful resistance to them, either from the ordinary people or from the establishment. And for the latter, that's because the establishment likes what these young woke warriors are doing. They're pushing
[30:41] the narrative. Look at the way, not just in Britain, but in other Western countries as well, you get these Antifa protesters coming up to counter freedom rallies, for example.
[30:59] Their opponents are always accused of racism and homophobia and all that sort of thing.
And the establishment just loves this because here is dissent against the establishment narrative
[31:17] being countered by, and often such as when there's a drag queen protest outside a library, for example, that there are more antifa counter protesters and a few brave people who dare to turn up for the protest itself. So what I think you've got going on here, Peter, is a supposedly liberal left newspaper, The New York Times, getting in a generational struggle.
The older writers, as you put it, who are more genuinely liberal, okay, they might have got fallen for all the COVID authoritarianism, but they still believe some of their kind of, liberal kind of outlook.
Whereas the younger journalists and staff at the New York Times, they are like the Red Guards of Mao's China.
You know, they're totally uncompromising and they are extremely shrill advocates of all these
[32:39] extreme causes like transgenderism. And it's interesting to see what happens with someone like someone like JK Rowling, who has been completely sort of persona non grata now.
And this is what goes on in workplaces as well. This is not just the New York Times, this goes on in universities up and down the country, not just in America, in Britain as well. In Britain,
[33:11] universities, older, genuinely academic, enlightenment-infused lecturers and professors are skating on thin ice now because of this Red Guard-like, woke revolution that's going on.
And the administrators, the senior administrators of principals and so on, they don't stand up for their staff.
They say they want to support these courses. Look what universities did with Black Lives Matter, for example.
They just took over the whole university for a couple of weeks back in 2020.
And they're fully, completely, totally in support of transgender ideology.
So who's going to win that battle in New York Times?
I think it's fairly obvious,
I think they'll just get, you know, they'll ease out some of their as some of some of their leading journalists have already left.
[34:21] But they will be eased out, leaving an ever more woke staff behind.
No, completely.
[34:31] I see. Sorry, I can see some of the comments as well from DLive.
There's Kryptonite Dude on DLive.
You can obviously watch on any of the platforms. If it's Rumble, if it's DLive, if it's Twitch, if it's on Twitter or on GETTR, on Rumble or directly on the website.
Great having you with us. Obviously Niall McCrae is not for YouTube.
So we keep more. We do do the, I think on Monday we'll do YouTube to discuss on CPAC.
So that should be safe. I don't think CPAC has been cancelled by YouTube as yet, but you never know.
We'll see. This is about the pro-life issue, well it's the free speech issue really.
And Pro Jam if you can just scroll up, a British pro-life advocate again arrested for thought crime of silent prayer near abortion clinic.
[35:25] This is the second time she's been arrested and actually the bill, this is under existing legislation, but the bill has passed through parliament, I think it was a couple of days ago and it passed through parliament which will now make it illegal to go within 150 metres of any abortion clinic if you do anything to oppose it, including silent prayer.
Some MPs tried to get an amendment through that would remove prayer but no, it was kicked out.
So the conservative government, Labour, all of them, they want to make prayer illegal.
But the second time this woman, even after being acquitted, what are your thoughts on this Niall?
[36:08] Well, you know, I could probably go on for half an hour on this, but I think I would prefer just to say the outstanding point about this incident, and it really is a profound point, is that thought crime literally is a thing now.
So this woman's private thoughts in the form of prayer.
[36:45] Completely unseen to anyone, but known only to herself, is now criminalized.
And what an amazing achievement that is of the authoritarian state, that you can now be arrested for praying.
I don't think the large numbers of Muslim men praying in the street in some towns and cities in the UK, I don't think they've got much to worry about. But you see, another just very quick point is that isn't it amazing how much protection abortion is being given?
And it's almost become like Holocaust denial. You know, if you deny the right to abortion, and not just, you know, most people, my guess is that most of the ordinary British public would accept abortion within a certain time period, you know, 20 weeks, 24 weeks, which is what we've got at the moment.
[38:03] But they wouldn't accept it to right, most people I don't think would want that right up to the point of birth or even beyond as some extreme advocates of abortion are calling for.
But again, it's something that people feel very scared to resist such is the outrage
[38:27] that you get for saying anything critical.
Of course, if you're a man, you're not allowed to say, talk about abortion at all, aren't you?
You'd have to do a temporary transition to females, so you could say a few words about it.
Yeah, it's just quite stunning how successful that the establishment has been in making abortion totally out of bounds for criticism.
Yeah, I would actually go as far as I like the heartbeat legislation in the States. You feel someone's pulse and you know they're alive. So that's about six weeks. That's what I would roll it back to. So I would be a full-on extremist. But can I just again repeat, this is happening under a so-called Conservative government. This is the Tories that want to make prayer illegal.
Let me repeat that. This is the Conservative government that if you go and vote for the the Conservative government, if you vote for Labour, if you vote for Green, if you vote for Libs, they all want to make prayer illegal. So choose how you vote. That's what I would say.
Yes. I'm glad you said that, Peter. Sometimes we need to remind ourselves and others that these things are happening under a Conservative government. And what the Conservatives hope
[39:53] is that come the next election, people will think, well, it's bad enough under us.
[39:59] But think how bad it's going to be under Labour. That's how they hope people will think, you know, better the devil you know. Now, I've got just a very quick self-promotion here. I've got an article coming out on Unity News Network tomorrow, which is a letter to MPs. So we've got an election that would be next year at latest. So probably it's going to be 2024. And before an election is called, I think people should be writing to their MPs, asking them where they stand on all these issues, which are the big issues of the time, none of which are in manifestos apart from the climate crap. But all this, the COVID stuff, the digital surveillance, you know, the cashless society, the transgender teaching to primary school children, none of these things were voted for. And I think that we deserve to know where our MPs, whether it's Labour, SNP, Tory, whatever they are. We need to be asking them where they stand on the biggest issues of our time, because the biggest issues of our time were not in large, mainly they were not in any party's manifesto.
[41:26] Yeah, not completely.
So, sorry, just to say that the article, it includes a letter that people can send, and I think it'd be really good if people from, you know, everywhere in the country, if you're living in the UK, if you send this letter to your MP, and the answers will be interesting.
It doesn't matter if they just use all kind of obfuscation or avoid the questions.
That itself is interesting, but it's also interesting if they send you a splurge of woke justifications for these policies.
Yeah. Will that be available on your GAB Neil?
[42:03] Yes, I'll put it out on GAB and it will also be on the Unity News Network website.
Yeah. Okay, wonderful.
We will certainly repost that and put it out. Hold our politicians to account as they think they can get away with, well, literally murder, So anything they like.
Last two stories will go to this lovely man who should be number one in a Nuremberg trial but
I don't think that will ever happen. But Hancock wanted to frighten the pants off the public with new COVID strain leaked messages suggest. I'm really interested Niall with this whole thing.
Obviously it was Isabelle Oakeshott, the other half, maybe the more evil half of Richard Tice, I would say. And she got these privately and then released them. That shows how despicable she is. Obviously, you can't trust her with a thing. But I'm just wondering whether they want to make Hancock the fall guy so the rest of them can walk away. What are your thoughts on all this stuff?
I agree with your comment that the fall guy in the UK is Matt Hancock.
And the fall guy in America is Anthony Fauci with two different stories.
[43:24] But they're both part of the same controlled release valve, the sort of revisionism on the the COVID narrative, because they have to move on.
I think the globalists need to move on from COVID now. They can't keep this lingering forever.
They've got big plans, and many things are going on behind the scenes.
But it seems that they want to move on from it now. And that's happening with two big stories that are going on.
In the Britain, we've had these WhatsApp messages, which were privately shown to Isabel Oakeshott, the journalist, but she said it was in the public interest for them to be published.
[44:19] I'm very suspicious, I'm afraid, of this whole thing. Listen to Isabel Oakeshott's view on Midazolam because you know many people have been saying okay you're exposing this about Matt Hancock about you know wanting to scare the pants off people but what about what about Midazolam and she says oh that's not story there's nothing in that and and that you know that that makes me very suspicious. I'll be quite frank, I could be totally wrong and I doubt if she, if Isabelle Oakeshott is going to sue me for this, but I would say she's working for the other side. I really do believe that. And the other story which is going on is the lab leak. Now, there's three views about COVID-19 as a virus, right?
One is that to believe the official narrative that it came from some bat soup in a wet market in Wuhan.
You know, that was the official story, wasn't it? Zoonotic transmission to some, you know, unhygienic food market.
The other story,
[45:45] the second one is that this must have come from a leak, accidental or deliberate, from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. What a coincidence that this lab is in the same city where this unprecedented, deadly coronavirus arose from. And for a while, I believed that story. I believed that this must have come from the lab. But then I came to the conclusion, and I know that most sceptics are not fully on board on the same boat as me on this, but I came to the conclusion that the whole
[46:29] COVID-19 phenomenon is a hoax. And that's why you can't be on YouTube, of course.
Oh yes. I know you too well Niall.
It is a hoax. And I think one of the best people to listen to on this is Patrick Henningsen, of UK Column. And if you look at the show he did yesterday, which you know, you can go back and replay it, and the one he did the Friday before where he lays out very clearly the argument that there never has been an isolated virus. The whole thing is a scam with PCR
[47:16] test fraud. Anthony Fauci is a fall guy in America because he was involved in the funding of this laboratory in Wuhan through the National Institutes of Health. Now he's being accused of funding this dangerous gain of function virus.
And people want him to be prosecuted, like Fox News and many Republican politicians and right wing commentators in America calling for Fauci to be prosecuted and for the Chinese government to pay reparations.
I don't agree with that. I believe that this is a much more serious crime, which is that this whole thing was a hoax.
And one day, one day in the future, people will eventually find that out.
But at the moment, it's only a very small minority of really deeply cynical people like myself that have come to that conclusion.
I'm on the rabbit hole looking down. I'm trying to work out.
I know it's interesting having the conversations with Dr. Malone about this specific thing.
[48:32] I'm still above the rabbit hole where I know you're further down.
Let's finish off with what happens when you do speak the truth. This is the absolutely legendary Mark Steyn. I say legendary because I remember following him 10 years ago whenever he was discussing Islam and the clash that we have in the West between Islam and our freedoms, and now he's taken on the role of legend and folklore through a completely separate, threat, and that is obviously on Covid. And here are telegraph misrepresenters of ruling against Mark Steyn. Well of course they do, sure they hate him. And they would like us all to be locked away and jammed. That's all the media right and left. But he obviously has had to leave. So, it's good, I guess, that this is coming out. Niall shows us the difficulty, I guess, of being a journalist in a mainstream organization. Even like GB News, it seems to be their massive restrictions under the Ofcom control?
[49:45] The Daily Telegraph around about 10 to 15 years ago did this big splash about expenses, MPs claiming expenses and it was kind of epitomized by that rich old Tory grandee that bought a duck house on the lake in his private mansion. Do you remember that?
I remember.
And so this is a telegraph doing the same thing again where it is apparently doing something anti-establishment government. And so stunning and brave is the Telegraph, publishing those WhatsApp messages of Isabell Oakeshott, showing all of this scandalous activity going on in government.
[50:55] And yet, the real story, which is the terrible harm that's been caused to people by these experimental genetic engineering injections, that they were coerced into taking and causing all kinds of problems, including death,
[51:19] and the Telegraph has got nothing to say about that at all. And indeed, when this Ofcom ruling
[51:27] was made, you know, total hypocritical ruling by Ofcom, but there we go, the Telegraph went out of its way to misreport it. This isn't just a mistake by the Telegraph. This is a message that it wanted people to know that anyone who criticizes the vaccines will be in trouble. And the Telegraph of course, like all the newspapers, they get vast amounts of money from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. And, you know, journalists wages are paid by the government these days. So it's a very interesting illustration of just how bought the newspapers are. What should have been, you know, if things were working properly in the media, they should have been, journalists should have been dancing up and down with glee at having this big story of a journalist free speech being suppressed by an organ of the state. But sadly, we don't live in those times, we live in the times where the Telegraph, the Guardian, the Times and the Mail are themselves
[52:50] organs of the state.
Yeah, they should all be on that Nuremberg trial. Neil, thank you so much for coming on. I really appreciate you giving your thoughts and there's Nanny Annie says, Thanks Niall, great show. I agree with everything you've said. So it's always good to have you on. Thank you.
[53:10] Thank you, Peter. And goodbye to all the viewers. Thank you.
Let me, actually, let me, sorry, there's one other, I just wanted to leave the viewers with a smile.
It's always good. Here was Bob Moran's latest, which I did think was genius as always.
Thanks for making us a vaccine. We made you a play swing. Beautiful. Let me, yeah, that's, we made you a play swing, went great. Make sure and share Bob Moran. Make sure and share everything he puts up. Make him known far and wide, everywhere you can. Make sure and share that.
[53:52] I just also wanted to just remind the viewers about, I've really got into Babylon Bee recently.
I heard Seth Dillon speak at an event I was at a month ago, but I've kind of glanced at it. Here are some of the pieces on the front news if you go on their news thing.
Man who's already purchased product just wants the ads to stop.
Tucker Carlson obtains 40,000 unseen hours of Biden falling down Air Force One stairs.
[54:22] Mario arrested for hate crime after leaving skid marks on Rainbow Road.
But it was one I just want to leave you with to go and have a look at and it was page five and it is this. Obviously this is all satire just in case you missed that. This is shocking study shows more kids identifying as members of world's most celebrated popular group and it just says a shocking Gallup poll has revealed that a rapidly increasing number of kids in Gen Z are now identifying as members of the world's most celebrated popular group. We're absolutely stunned by this says sociologist Dr. Veg Bergman. We can't begin to explain why young, impressionable kids who are desperate for popularity and affirmation are suddenly choosing to become members of the most popular and affirmed group in human history. Every single movie, TV show, corporation, TikTok influencer, YouTuber, public school teacher, pop star and Hollywood star in the country openly promote and celebrate this group. Why on earth would teenagers want to be part of it?
[55:25] It must be biology. And it goes on. Absolutely phenomenal how they use satire so powerfully
[55:33] to mock and ridicule and give you a smile. So make sure and do go to Babylon Bee. I really got into it just a couple of days ago when I was in the States and someone sent me one and I read it, the whole article for the first time, I thought this isn't just good, this is genius. So obviously,
Yeah, and there's also the Pacific, which is a piss take of Atlantic monthly.
[56:00] And another Twitter account that some of you might have seen is clownworldtoday.
And I've often said to people, if you want to know what's going on in the world over the last three years, look at just go on clownworldtoday Twitter.
Yeah, no, I agree. I love it. I love it. I really do. Let me just say, do go, please do go when you finish, go to guncat5.com, go sign up the newsletter.
[56:33] They've got a phenomenal team there of true conservatives who are making sure people are protected in the States and something that we can't do here. But anyway, that's a whole other issue. On that, I will say bye. We'll let you all go. We've kept you here for an hour. Let you go and enjoy your favourite beverage or whatever you wish to do for the rest of today. Have a great weekend. Good Sunday. I will see you on Monday with Karen Siegemund, unpacking CPAC. That'll be live at 8. So you can come on and give us your thoughts. We'll pull in comments during the show.
I will even risk YouTube. There you go. Can't do better than that.
On that, thank you so much and we'll see you Monday. So thank you and goodbye.
