Lab Leak Leaks

2023-03-06

We are now able to say the obvious-that SARS 2 was a bioweapon. The gaslighting over 3 years, starting with the very obvious one, that SARS 2 was said to be a "novel virus" never before seen by humanity, even though it was labeled TWO , which comes after ONE, which was SARS 1, released back in 2003 or so. Then we were told that it came from man eating a bat in China, and quickly spread from there to Italy, Iran and a Washington state nursing home, even though this respiratory virus was not...

We are now able to say the obvious-that SARS 2 was a bioweapon.

The gaslighting over 3 years, starting with the very obvious one, that SARS 2 was said to be a "novel virus" never before seen by humanity, even though it was labeled TWO , which comes after ONE, which was SARS 1, released back in 2003 or so.

Then we were told that it came from man eating a bat in China, and quickly spread from there to Italy, Iran and a Washington state nursing home, even though this respiratory virus was not spread person to person through the air, it was spread by "fomites". How fomites got from China to Iran was left as a mystery.

Anyway, apparently as part of the war drums beating against China we are now allowed to talk about it, but not all of it. So we read from the testimony of a DARPA employee who was part of the process.

Comments (3)