Many important questions about cause and effect are impractical to answer with a randomized experiment. What should we do instead? In this episode we talk about doing causal inference with observational data. Has psychology's historical obsession with internal validity led it, ironically, to think about causal inference in an unsophisticated way? Can formal analytic tools like directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) tell us how to do better studies? Or is their main lesson don't bother trying? How do norms and incentives in publishing help or hurt in doing better causal inference? Plus: We answer a letter about applying to psychology grad school when your background is in data science.
Links:
The Black Goat is hosted by Sanjay Srivastava, Alexa Tullett, and Simine Vazire. Find us on the web at www.theblackgoatpodcast.com, on Twitter at @blackgoatpod, on Facebook at facebook.com/blackgoatpod/, and on instagram at @blackgoatpod. You can email us at letters@theblackgoatpodcast.com. You can subscribe to us on iTunes or Stitcher.
Our theme music is Peak Beak by Doctor Turtle, available on freemusicarchive.org under a Creative Commons noncommercial attribution license. Our logo was created by Jude Weaver.
This is episode 76. It was recorded on March 16, 2020.
Creativity and Rigor
Welcome To The Big Leagues
The Year 2017 in Review
Whodunnit
Significant Feelings
We Were Never Cool
The Learning Curve
Disagreeing about Science
The Meaning of It All (with Anna Alexandrova)
All Your Idols Have Clay Feet
Big Time
SIPSapalooza
A Psychometrician's Guide to Popularity
The Iron Psychologist (with Jamil Zaki)
'Cause You're There For Me Too
It's So Complicated
Nullius in verba
I Felt Like a Real Scientist
Confessions of a Replicator (with Rich Lucas)
Dancing On Our Own
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
DNA Today: A Genetics Podcast
The Psychic Elephant Radio Podcast
Strange by Nature Podcast
Sasquatch Chronicles
Hidden Brain