As promised, we return in very short order with the completion of our analysis and response to the oral argument in Trump v. Anderson - before the Court has ruled. Again, key clips from the argument are played and dissected. The previous Part I episode concentrated on arguments concerning self-execution of Section Three; this episode reviews many of the other issues addressed by the Court, from questions of the nature of the Presidential Election and the closely related Electoral College, to the persistent irritant of "officer" and "office" questions. As in the prior episode, Professor Amar “slows everything down” to allow you and hopefully the Court avoid sweet-sounding but flawed paths. This episode is posted 8 days early for this reason. Continuing legal education credit is available; visit podcast.njsba.com after listening.
Empire of History - Special Guest Gordon S. Wood
Literary Labyrinth
The Ayes and Nays Upon Texas
A Friendly Judge
Sabermetrics for Lawyers
Confirmation Cacophony
Neal Katyal's Life in the Law, Part 2 (Special Guest)
Neal Katyal's Life in the Law, Part I
Witness in the Center Square
Tall Tales
Architects May Come
Political Football
Know the Nine You Will
Yale's Constitution - Special Episode - Guest Nicholas Christakis
They Are Small Colleges
Princeton Palaver Present
Princeton Palaver Past
Harvard Hooey
Torture, Trump, and Tech - A Conversation with Alan Dershowitz
Constitutionalists United - Special Guest Floyd Abrams
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free