PART ONE:Scrutiny of a recent fatwa from Iran's Supreme Leader claiming that the West need not worry about a nuclear-armed IranWhat diplomatic rhetoric and support for terrorist proxies suggests about Iran's hegemonic ambitionsIsraeli and Pentagon warnings about Iran's nuclear capabilitiesPART TWO:The new nuclear framework: simply “an agreement to agree”An Iranian "exemption" to the U.S. policy of pre...
PART ONE:
- Scrutiny of a recent fatwa from Iran's Supreme Leader claiming that the West need not worry about a nuclear-armed Iran
- What diplomatic rhetoric and support for terrorist proxies suggests about Iran's hegemonic ambitions
- Israeli and Pentagon warnings about Iran's nuclear capabilities
PART TWO:
- The new nuclear framework: simply “an agreement to agree”
- An Iranian "exemption" to the U.S. policy of preventing states from enrichment and reprocessing nuclear technologies
- Factors making it impossible for inspectors to properly monitor all undeclared nuclear facilities
- Vast specificities laid out in the original framework that are cause for concern
PART THREE:
- Assessing the possibility for Iran to have a peaceful nuclear program without enriching uranium
- UAE and Saudi Arabian claims they want to have the same nuclear rights that Iran will soon be granted
- Russia and China’s role in the current negotiations
PART FOUR:
- Weighing limited strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities as an alternative to the current deal
- Where Israel stands on working with Washington vs. using military force against Iran
- Logistics of how the Fordow nuclear facility could be taken out
- Differences between uranium enrichment and plutonium reprocessing
View more