Between the Ocean and the Land - The Deeper Thinking Podcast

Between the Ocean and the Land

The Deeper Thinking Podcast

A meditation on ambiguity, borderlands, and the ethics of remaining incomplete.

She walks along the tide line where the maps blur. Where the shore is no longer shore, and the ocean not yet sea. This is not a crossing, but an arrival into something unresolved. Beneath the surface of things that almost become one another, there is a silence that is not empty. A stillness that asks to be heard.

Ambiguity is often treated as something to be resolved. A gap in understanding. A flaw in comprehension. But here, it is understood as environment—an entire perceptual and cultural landscape that asks not to be mastered, but inhabited. In this space, clarity is not the goal. What emerges instead is a form of presence: lucid, incomplete, and essential.

Touch, breath, ritual—these are not metaphors, but epistemologies. Maurice Merleau-Ponty argued that perception is not distant observation, but entanglement. Simone Weil described attention as a moral act—waiting without grasping, perceiving without possession. And in the work of Gloria Anzaldúa, the “borderland” becomes more than geography—it is a condition of knowing, a refusal of coherence imposed from without.

The cognitive discomfort of uncertainty is well documented. The mind’s need for closure is not merely psychological but ancestral. Yet beneath that impulse lies another: the ability to remain. In silence. In paradox. In a space that neither confirms nor denies. It is not a failure of will, but a form of devotion. The tension is real. But so is the possibility.

Not all things can be resolved. Some should not be. The architecture of experience is not always built for conclusion. The world may be more honest when it is allowed to remain unfinished.

Reflections

Some of the questions that surfaced along the way:

• What if ambiguity is a location, not a lack?
• How do we remain with uncertainty when clarity feels urgent?
• Can perception be ethical if it refuses mastery?
• What if attention becomes sacred when it doesn’t resolve?
• How does the body carry truths that evade language?
• Is completion always the right ambition?
• Could not-knowing be a form of deep knowing?

Why Listen?

• Reframe ambiguity as a generative, ethical condition
• Engage with phenomenology, mysticism, and epistemic borderlands
• Discover how perception, ritual, and attention become knowing
• Explore the philosophical and emotional textures of the unresolved

Listen On:

• YouTube
• Spotify
• Apple Podcasts

Support This Work

If you'd like to support the ongoing work, you can visit buymeacoffee.com/thedeeperthinkingpodcast or leave a kind review on Apple Podcasts.

Bibliography

• Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1968.
• Weil, Simone. Gravity and Grace. London: Routledge, 2002.
• Anzaldúa, Gloria. Borderlands/La Frontera. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books, 1987.
• Haraway, Donna. Staying with the Trouble. Durham: Duke University Press, 2016.

Some truths reveal themselves only in the unfinishing.

#Ambiguity #MerleauPonty #SimoneWeil #GloriaAnzaldúa #Uncertainty #Philosophy #Attention #Perception #Borderlands #DonnaHaraway #TheDeeperThinkingPodcast #Phenomenology #Ethics #NotKnowing

Bibliography Relevance

• Maurice Merleau-Ponty: Frames perception as an embodied entanglement with the world, not a detached observation. His work helps reorient ambiguity as an ecological condition—one felt through the skin rather than solved in the mind.
• Simone Weil: Describes attention as a sacred, receptive act. In this framework, ambiguity becomes a space for devotion, where truth is allowed to arrive unforced and incompletely.
• Gloria Anzaldúa: Introduces the borderland as an epistemic zone of contradiction, hybridity, and transformation. Her concept of “nepantla” supports ambiguity as a generative threshold state, not a crisis of coherence.
• Donna Haraway: Advocates for staying with the trouble—remaining within complexity without collapsing it into resolution. Her posthumanist ethics offers a powerful anchor for living inside ambiguity as a relational responsibility.