Radical Media - by Maajid Nawaz

Founding the Accordists

This Radical Dispatch Newszine - below - is provided free for all subscribers.At the top of this post, Resistance Radio presents our Radical Show audio/video podcast from Tuesday 5th August 2025, with a transcript provided - Founding the Accordists - A Statement by Maajid Nawaz.Due to the nature of the statement being made, this usually premium Radical Show podcast has been made free for all members of Radical Media.Subscribe nowShareFounding the Accordists- Statement by Maajid Nawaz Breaking: On 15th September 2025 - the occasion of the fifth anniversary of the signing of the Abraham Accords in President Trump’s first term - we launched our new campaign group the Accordists and our webpage Accordists.org, for peace and prosperity in the Middle East. The purpose of the Accordists is to revive, consolidate and expand on the successes of the Abraham Accords. As explained in the above press release, our exclusively commissioned polling of British opinion reveals the need for the Accordists. This logic was explained by us in our launch interview on Nigel Farage’s GB News show with host Martin Daubney on the evening of 15th September 2025.Click to play:Most Brits Want Peace — But Haven't Heard of the Abraham AccordsMaajid Nawaz on GB News with Martin Daubney: “And you'd be forgiven for not having heard of the fact that in President Trump's first term, those peace deals, the Abraham Accords, were signed. That didn't get the media attention then that it deserved, to the point where, again, the YouGov poll that we commissioned discovered that 87% of the British public have not heard of the Abraham Accords. So we find ourselves in this peculiar situation where the overwhelming majority of the British public who expressed an opinion, 91%, want better relations between Arabs and Israelis, but they don't know of the existing framework that's already in place, which acts as a vehicle to get those better relations. 87% of people haven't heard of the Abraham Accords. The purpose of the Accordists was founded to fill that void, where the public says, yes, they want better relations, and our point is, well, there exists a vehicle to get those better relations. That's the Abraham Accords. It's a regional, and a regionally negotiated approach, for peace in the Middle East. And that's what we're about.”As we explained in that interview, the Israel / Palestine conflict is a regional problem and hence requires a regional solution.Click to play:The Israel - Palestine Conflict Isn’t Just BilateralMaajid Nawaz on GB News with Martin Daubney: “This is not an Israel-Palestinian authority problem. It simply, frankly, isn't. And if we continue to try and approach it in that way, we're in danger of repeating the same thing, making the same mistake, which is the definition of madness. We've got to come to a realisation that this is, in fact, a regional problem, and therefore it must have a regional solution, a regionally negotiated solution. What do I mean by the fact that it's a regional problem? Well, at the end of the day, it's Iran that funds - we know this - Iran funds the terrorist organisation Hamas in Gaza, Iran funds Hezbollah in Lebanon, arms and funds, and Iran arms and funds the Houthis in Yemen. So you've got one regional country there, Iran, clearly involved. On the other side, you've got Saudi Arabia that fought a bitter civil war with Iran, inside Yemen. It's tragic as it is, it's got nothing to do with Israel there. That’s a Saudi - Iranian war. So now we’ve introduced three different countries fighting each other. Israel, Iran and Saudi Arabia. All fighting each other in that region. And we haven't even gotten to those other countries we named who are trying to make peace with Israel in the same region, such as the UAE, Morocco, and Bahrain. So that kind of demonstrates the multipolarity of this. It's a regional problem, and it must have a regional solution.”Accordists will work towards reviving, consolidating on and expanding that regional approach.Click to play: Maajid Nawaz on GB News with Martin Daubney: “Because the Abraham Accords, when they were signed five years ago under Trump's first term, they bumped up the number of countries that began to have relations with Israel and vice versa. And that significantly impacted the metric to a point where over the course of 70 years, the Arab-Israeli relations are better than they've ever been. Morocco, the Emirates, that's UAE, and Bahrain and Sudan all signed the Abraham Accords. Sudan is yet to ratify, but again, it's an Arab Muslim-majority country. And we find in those examples hope, if only people had heard of the Abraham Accords. And so our mission is to revive the sentiment for peace in the Middle East through the Abraham Accords, consolidate the gains we've already made, maybe have countries like Sudan ratify the accords that they signed. Syria, the new leader of Syria, Ahmed al-Shara - who has credibility among Sunni Muslims in the region because of the fact that he had a fighting background, he was involved in the overthrow of Assad - he's made overtures just in this last week, that the Syrian government may well make some form of security arrangement with Israel. So there is definitely hope. But again, that only comes if we can create a public mandate for it and then our governments work towards it as part of their foreign policy.”As referenced in the above interview, our unique 70-year lifetime Recognition Index for the Middle East shows that despite the horrific short term circumstances, relations between Arabs and Israelis are in fact - using tangible, measurable metrics - at an historic high. Syria may well be one of those new countries that decides to enter into some form of security arrangement with the Israelis next. Roya News English reports 13th September 2025:"There are ongoing negotiations for a security agreement to ensure Israel returns to its state before December 8."There is hope for peace yet. We ask that you all support our efforts. ACTIONS FOR YOU:1) Register with the Accordists by clicking through to our website here.2) Follow our social media, post a photo of yourself with the Accordists logo and tag us @Accordists on Instagram or Twitter. The Accordists logo can be dowloaded for free here:We Are Accordists646KB ∙ PDF fileDownloadDownloadHere is our very first Accordists photo with Jacob Rees-Mogg and Martin Daubney, our hosts at GB News.3) Share our first Accordists press release with friends and family:A free PDF of our press release with our full YouGov survey results attached is here:Accordists Press Release2.29MB ∙ PDF fileDownloadDownload4) Watch and share the free Radical show podcast announcing our launch that is attached to this newszine. 5) Share our launch interview with Accordist founder Maajid Nawaz on Nigel Farage’s GB News show with Martin Daubney and Jacob-Rees Mogg. The full unedited video file from the above GB News interview on the Nigel Farage show with Martin Daubney is reproduced here.Click to play:Martin Daubney, GB News: “Welcome back to GB News Tonight with me, your host, Martin Daubney. Now, Donald Trump will arrive in the UK tomorrow for his unprecedented second state visit, where they're expected to sign a nuclear energy deal. It just so happens that today marks the fifth anniversary of the signing of the historic Abraham Accords. Of course, that is the set of agreements that establish relationships between Israel and several Arab states. Well, my next guest today has launched a new think tank that's called the Accordists. And it's dedicated to the expansion of the Abraham Accords to bring peace and prosperity to the people across the Middle East. And along with this, we have some very interesting new YouGov polling, which reveals this: 75% of the British public think it is important for Israel and Arab nations to have good relations to ensure global peace and security. Perhaps equally fascinating, however, only 8% of the country consider the situation in Gaza to be an important election issue, with the most popular being immigration. So once again, showing the political class are in a completely different world. I'm delighted to join the studio by the founder of the Accordists, Maajid Nawaz. Maajid, superb to have you in the studio. What's taken so long? Fifth anniversary today. Tell us why the Abraham Accords are still vitally important?”Maajid Nawaz, Accordists Founder: “Well, of course, thank you for having me, Martin. Of course, everybody sees on our airwaves the horrific news coming from war. All war is horrific, and the war in the Middle East is particularly so, because it's been dragging on for so long. Today is the fifth anniversary of the very first peace initiative since the assassination of Sadat, who was the president of Egypt in 1981. He was assassinated for seeking to make peace between Egypt and Israel. And that assassination stalled peace efforts up until the 90s, when a smaller country, the Kingdom of Jordan, attempted to make some form of approaches to negotiations with Israel. But nothing's happened since, until five years ago under President Trump's first term. Now, the key thing with those stats you mentioned is when you discount those who said that they didn't have an opinion, then that figure - of those who think that peace between Arabs and Israelis is important - goes up to 91%. And you'd be forgiven for not having heard of the fact that in President Trump's first term, those peace deals, the Abraham Accords, were signed. That didn't get the media attention then that it deserved, to the point where, again, the YouGov poll that we commissioned discovered that 87% of the British public have not heard of the Abraham Accords. So we find ourselves in this peculiar situation where the overwhelming majority of the British public who expressed an opinion, 91%, want better relations between Arabs and Israelis, but they don't know of the existing framework that's already in place, which acts as a vehicle to get those better relations. 87% of people haven't heard of the Abraham Accords. The purpose of the Accordists was founded to fill that void, where the public says, yes, they want better relations, and our point is, well, there exists a vehicle to get those better relations. That's the Abraham Accords. It's a regional, and a regionally negotiated approach, for peace in the Middle East. And that's what we're about.”Martin Daubney: “Maajid Nawaz when we see October the 7th, when we see the complete breakdown of peace between Christian nations, Jewish nations, and increasingly poisonous Islamism, is there any hope for peace, or is this a forlorn attempt?” Maajid Nawaz: “Well, I can understand why people would be very much in despair at the moment. The situation is beyond horrific. It's something which is the stuff of nightmares, to be honest. And war is the stuff of nightmares. Nobody should be encouraging war. But actually, what I'd say to you, Martin, is that that's the very reason why this is needed. If now is not the time to be calling for peace, when is? And the key thing is that on accordists.org, which is the website for the Accordists, we've put up a metric. For the first time, what we've managed to do is provide measurables for relations between Arabs and Israelis. And people may be surprised to know that in the long term, over the course of one lifetime, that's 70 years, in fact, with the measurables we've put on our metric on accordist.org, we find ourselves in a historic high in terms of relationships. Why? Because the Abraham Accords, when they were signed five years ago under Trump's first term, they bumped up the number of countries that began to have relations with Israel and vice versa. And that significantly impacted the metric to a point where over the course of 70 years, the Arab-Israeli relations are better than they've ever been. Morocco, the Emirates, that's UAE, and Bahrain and Sudan all signed the Abraham Accords. Sudan is yet to ratify, but again, it's an Arab Muslim-majority country. And we find in those examples hope, if only people had heard of the Abraham Accords. And so our mission is to revive the sentiment for peace in the Middle East through the Abraham Accords, consolidate the gains we've already made, maybe have countries like Sudan ratify the accords that they signed. Syria, the new leader of Syria, Ahmed al-Shara - who has credibility among Sunni Muslims in the region because of the fact that he had a fighting background, he was involved in the overthrow of Assad - he's made overtures just in this last week, that the Syrian government may well make some form of security arrangement with Israel. So there is definitely hope. But again, that only comes if we can create a public mandate for it and then our governments work towards it as part of their foreign policy.”Martin Daubney: “May I ask you, as well as laudable attempts at peace, is there sometimes a call for something else? The eradication, perhaps, of Hamas, of Hezbollah, maybe of the Ayatollahs. They won't sit down and talk peace any time soon, will they?”Maajid Nawaz: “Well, this is why the regional approach, which is the Abraham Accords, is so important. I'm glad you asked that question, because it allows us to say, look, at the end of the day, this is not a bilateral problem. This is not an Israel-Palestinian authority problem. It simply, frankly, isn't. And if we continue to try and approach it in that way, we're in danger of repeating the same thing, making the same mistake, which is the definition of madness. We've got to come to a realisation that this is, in fact, a regional problem, and therefore it must have a regional solution, a regionally negotiated solution. What do I mean by the fact that it's a regional problem? Well, at the end of the day, it's Iran that funds - we know this - Iran funds the terrorist organisation Hamas in Gaza, Iran funds Hezbollah in Lebanon, arms and funds, and Iran arms and funds the Houthis in Yemen. So you've got one regional country there, Iran, clearly involved. On the other side, you've got Saudi Arabia that fought a bitter civil war with Iran, inside Yemen. It's tragic as it is, it's got nothing to do with Israel there. That’s a Saudi - Iranian war. So now we’ve introduced three different countries fighting each other. Israel, Iran and Saudi Arabia. All fighting each other in that region. And we haven't even gotten to those other countries we named who are trying to make peace with Israel in the same region, such as the UAE, Morocco, and Bahrain. So that kind of demonstrates the multipolarity of this. It's a regional problem, and it must have a regional solution.”Martin Daubney: “Maajid Nawaz, a font of knowledge, such passion. It's great to see you back in the studio. Thank you very much indeed. Superb. And of course, the Accordists, people can go along and get involved in that. Thanks for coming in.” Maajid Nawaz: “Thank you.”Our mission is to bring you Radical Media for Radical truths that modern corporatist media seek to silence. We cannot do this without your support. Premium members also receive WARRIOR CREED and other Resistance Radio content and special offers. Please ensure that your card details are kept up to date for timely subscription renewal. We also encourage you to upgrade your membership to an annual or founder membership here:Subscribe nowFeel free to recommend Radical Media to your friends and family either by buying them a gift membership here:Give a gift subscriptionOr by sharing Radical Media with them for free here:Share Radical Media - by Maajid Nawaz

UK's DC Ambassador Lord Mandelson Sacked For Epstein-Friendship Day After Charlie Kirk Assassination

NOTE: this urgent Radical Dispatch and premium WARRIOR CREED livestream replaces the scheduled write-up for last Tuesday’s WARRIOR CREED and accompanying Dispatch, which will be sent to all our premium members separately. This podcast can be set to either audiovisual, or just audio, and is for premium members of Radical Media only. To listen, basic members should upgrade to the premium service here:ShareRead on now for our free Radical Dispatch.Subscribe nowShareUK's DC Ambassador Lord Mandelson Sacked For Epstein-Friendship Day After Charlie Kirk Assassination- A Radical Dispatch1) UK's DC Ambassador Lord Mandelson Sacked For Epstein-FriendshipIn major news today Britain’s ambassador to the US, Lord Peter Mandelson has finally been sacked by PM Starmer for his indefensible relationship with Epstein. The Times reports 11th September 2025:The Times reports 11th September 2025:“Depth of Mandelson-Epstein relationship was new information, No 10 says. Starmer found Mandelson’s emails to Epstein ‘reprehensible’, Downing Street has said. Asked if the prime minister shared the view of two ministers who said they were disgusted and sickened by the messages, Starmer’s spokesman said: ‘I think it’s self-evident that he found the content of these emails reprehensible.’ Asked what aspect Starmer found reprehensible, he said the depth and extent of the relationship shown in the emails was ‘new information’. ‘And they show that Peter Mandelson suggested that Jeffrey Epstein’s first conviction was wrongful, should be challenged — that is why he’s been withdrawn as ambassador with immediate effect.’”Our regular readers will be aware that Radical Media has been reporting on this for a long time. Radical Media reports 12th February 2025:When the US House Oversight Committee recently published some new documents related to the Epstein case involving Lord Mandelson his first reaction was to apologise for the embarrassment, but essentially double down by denying any further wrong doing.The Times reports 10th September 2025:“Lord Mandelson has apologised for an ‘embarrasing’ birthday message to Jeffrey Epstein, as he claimed his friendship with the paedophile financier was an ‘albatross around my neck’. Britain’s ambassador to Washington said he ‘fell for [Epstein’s] lies’, after a ‘birthday book’ presented to the financier in 2003 was published by a Congressional committee this week.”As the Times reports, Mandelson ran with the defence that the information released was from before Epstein was indicted.The Times reports 10th September 2025:“In his first interview since the revelation, Mandelson, a former Labour cabinet minister, said: ‘I find them very embarrassing to see and to read, but they were written before he was indicted’.”Click to view:Lord Mandelson: “I feel a tremendous sense, a profound sense of sympathy for those people, those women who suffered as a result of his behaviour and his illegal criminal activities. And secondly, I regret very, very deeply indeed carrying on that association with him for far longer than I should have done. And I regret very much that I fell for his lies I fell and accepted assurances that he had given me about his indictment, his original criminal case in Florida. Like very many people, I took at face value what he said. With hindsight, with fresh information, many years later, we realised that we had been wrong to believe him. He is a charismatic criminal liar, we now see. And I regret very much indeed, I felt it like a like an albatross around my neck since his death in 2018 or 19 when it was. I feel a tremendous sense of regret, not only that I met him in the first place, but I continued the association and I took at face value the lies that he fed me and many others.”In this, PM Starmer backed him all the way.The Times reports 10th September 2025:“On Tuesday, Downing Street defended Mandelson and said that Starmer still had confidence in his ambassador. ‘We’re focused, obviously, on our relationship with the US,’ said the prime minister’s official spokesman. ‘We’ve got President Trump coming for an unprecedented state visit next week to build on the progress we’ve already made between our governments.’ Challenged on whether Starmer still had confidence in Mandelson, the spokesman said: ‘Yes and as I say, the ambassador’s played a key part in all of the achievements I’ve just run through when it comes to strengthening the trade relationship with the US, the UK-US defence deal, and work to end Putin’s war.’ Asked how Starmer felt about Mandelson’s ‘best pal’ being a paedophile, the spokesman replied: ‘You’ve got his statement on that so I’ll refer you back to that’.”But not only did those new documents released by the House Oversight Committee (backed up here) reveal embarrassingly gushing praise by Lord Mandelson for his close friend Epstein. Subsequent leaked emails - effectively buried in media by news of Charlie Kirk’s assassination - exposed Mandelson’s denials as a lie, and forced PM Starmer’s hand in sacking him. The Times reports 11th September 2025:“Mandelson kept in contact as Epstein faced child sex charges. In May 2006, police in Florida filed a probable cause affidavit saying Epstein should be charged with four counts of unlawful sexual activity with a minor and one count of lewd and lascivious molestation. One of the alleged victims was 14 years old. Later that month, Mandelson messaged him saying: ‘I am following you closely and here whenever you need.’ The next month, he wrote again to say: ‘Worried that I haven’t heard from you. Are you seeing them off and winning?’ On the day that Epstein was arrested and charged, Mandelson wrote: ‘Keep me posted. Where are you next week?’”Such entreaties by Mandelson to Epstein even continued after the latter’s conviction. The Times reports 11th September 2025:“Mandelson urged Epstein to ‘fight for early release.’ Emails between Mandelson and Epstein, which were published on Wednesday by Bloomberg, revealed how his relationship with the disgraced financier continued long after allegations against him first arose in 2006. In an email sent the day before the paedophile financier began an 18-month prison sentence for soliciting sex from a minor, Mandelson wrote to Epstein to say that his ‘friends stay with you and love you’. ‘I think the world of you and I feel hopeless and furious about what has happened,’ he wrote in June 2008. ‘I can still barely understand it. It just could not happen in Britain. You have to be incredibly resilient, fight for early release and be philosophical about it as much as you can. The whole thing has been years of torture and now you have to show the world how big a person you are, and how strong. Your friends stay with you and love you’.”As Radical Media previously revealed in much detail, Lord Mandelson never stopped contacting or visiting Epstein long after his first ‘sweetheart’ conviction in Florida.Radical Media reports 11th January 2024:All of this raises the question, who was responsible for vetting Lord Mandelson as he was appointed by PM Starmer to his latest diplomatic role in DC? The Times reports 11th September 2025:“Ministers insist Mandelson was vetted ‘robustly.’ The government has insisted that Lord Mandelson was subject to ‘robust security clearances and processes’ before his appointment. Stephen Doughty, the Foreign Office minister, said Epstein was a ‘despicable criminal who committed the most heinous crimes and destroyed the lives of so many women’.”In fact, it has since been revealed that Mandelson himself admitted his friendship with Epstein during his vetting process. The Times reports 11th September 2025:“Lord Mandelson admitted in his vetting interview for US ambassador that he continued his relationship with the paedophile Jeffrey Epstein for many years, allies said last night, as Sir Keir Starmer faced questions from cabinet ministers about his political judgment.”We here at Radical Media have been canceled from corporate media for far far less in our public challenge of Covid mandates.The image of the British embassy and diplomatic staff in Washington DC has been severely harmed by this fiasco, having announced Mandelson’s appointment with great fanfare earlier this year. Which was posted by the embassy alongside the below cringeworthy video.Click to play:Peter Mandelson: “Hello, I'm Peter Mandelson, and I'm proud to serve as His Majesty's British Ambassador to the United States of America. It's great to be up and running in the US, a country in which I have spent so much of my adult life and admire so much. I'm speaking to you from the Ambassador's residence, a building that symbolises decades of friendship hosting countless presidents, prime ministers, politicians, royalty, and many ordinary American citizens. I'm crystal clear, the UK has no closer ally than America and no one does more than our two countries together in intelligence sharing and defence, with our jet fighters our naval missions and army special forces operating together in the world. Our deep economic and cultural ties are unrivalled. Looking ahead, President Trump's administration is shaping up to be one of the most consequential periods in modern America. I feel energised by the opportunities opening up to work more closely together in tackling threats to our security and collaborating together and exploiting new technologies to boost jobs and higher living standards. I was born in London to a middle-class family. My father was from Jewish parents whose own father helped found a local synagogue. My loving mother was always there for my older brother and me. My father worked hard to send us both to university. At Oxford University, my passion for learning and to drive change was ignited. I've served as a legislator, elected first to the House of Commons, and more recently in Parliament's Upper House. I've also helped found and grow a successful international business, promoting market access and investment around the world. I'm ready to bring my policy knowledge, entrepreneurial spirit, and experience at the highest levels of government to this role. As Northern Ireland Secretary, I was responsible for implementing the Good Friday Agreement, which finally brought peace to that troubled part of the United Kingdom. Today, the UK government's number one priority is economic growth. More than one million Britons work for US companies and a million Americans work for UK firms. The UK and the US already have 1.5 trillion dollars invested in each other. And I'm confident we can go even further and faster together. I’m hugely grateful for the warm welcome since our arrival. Ronaldo, with whom I have lived happily for 28 years, and I are so happy to be here making our home in the great United States of America. We look forward to exploring this magnificent country from coast to coast, from state to state, and meeting many new friends along the way.”It is also with his Epstein connection in mind that one should read Mandelson’s ominous remarks to the Times about the benefits of making his policy positions in America known “directly and privately” in order to “influence the president and his policies, where necessary.” The Times reports 11th February 2025:“The first political appointee to the US ambassador role in 50 years, Mandelson is also tasked with helping the UK to avoid swingeing tariffs promised by Trump…’I believe that given the relationship that we have, we can always make our views known, best by the way directly and privately, we have a strong relationship that enables us to influence the president and his policies, where necessary,’ he said…He was twice forced to resign from Tony Blair’s government and is reported to have had close ties to the sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. ‘I regret ever meeting him or being introduced to him by his partner Ghislaine Maxwell,’ Mandelson told the Financial Times this month. ‘I regret even more the hurt he caused to many young women’.”What exactly did Lord Mandelson intend to communicate directly and privately, and to whom?Of course, merely appearing on Epstein’s island, in one of his mansions, or elsewhere with him, is not conclusive proof of guilt. Such evidence does require corroboration. Radical Media advises corroborating any name suspected of being an Epstein client or collaborator, against a robust check list of Epstein related activity. The best way to assess the names mentioned by all witnesses is to match them with other corroborating evidence. Such corroboration would include, but not be restricted to matching:i) Names mentioned by trial witnesses (searchable), with:ii) Names in Epstein’s ‘Little Black Book’ (searchable), or his older black book from 1997 (searchable),iii) The flight paths and flight logs (searchable) kept by Epstein’s private jet nicknamed ‘The Lolita Express’,iv) Names mentioned in Epstein’s private calendar,v) Evidence of having been on Epstein’s Island, andvi) Evidence of having visited any of Epstein’s homes.And as the Radical Dispatch has already determined, the entire Epstein operation was evidently a global CIA/Mossad honeytrap used for blackmail. A final corroboration would therefore be to identify:vii) which of the names betray behaviour beholden to Netanyahu’s foreign policy objectives, by publicly advocating for war, the commission of war crimes, or any other crimes against humanity. Mandelson’s name is easier to corroborate not only because it was unsealed by Judge Loretta Preska, but Epstein’s ‘Little Black Book’ reportedly contains no less than ten separate contact entries for Mandelson:Add to this Mandelson’s historic relationships with suspected pedophiles, and matters look even worse. This incident below may indeed have been a genuine mix up. But this one is much harder to merely explain away in light of all of the above. As is this one. But by the time you learn of Mandelson‘s relationship with former British PM Edward Heath, a suspected serial pedophile, things start looking quite worrying. Yes, that is this Edward Heath: The Guardian reports 10th September 2017:And yet despite all of this, Mandelson is the man that PM Keir Starmer chose to make Britain’s ambassador to the US. The man that Starmer refused - for quite a considerable time - to distance himself from.The Telegraph reports 21st June 2023:“Sir Keir Starmer will continue receiving advice from Lord Mandelson, despite accusations he maintained a friendship with Jeffrey Epstein..”Indeed, the same Keir Starmer who as head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) failed to prosecute known serial pedophile, the late Jimmy Saville.The Sun reports 16th June 2020:So what exactly does Mandelson have on Starmer? Does any of this feel right to you? Maajid Nawaz on GB News with Neil Oliver, 6th February 2025, Click to play:Full interview with Neil Oliver on GB News can be found on youtube as Part 1 and Part 2.“Pakistani street gangs are only one element and that's why we immediately said this was a cover-up don’t just talk about the street level gangs they are organised gangs who have their connections in the police, the social services, the local councils, all the way up through the national political hierarchy of the Labour party. Now, since we said that, it all came out. We were pointing at the time to Lord Ahmed's conviction for underage sex abuse, who was a Labour peer from Rotherham, which was a trigger case for these grooming gangs. Now that's from right at the top. We were also pointing to Keir Starmer's decision to appoint Peter Mandelson, as his ambassador to the US, Mandelson the same guy, without a doubt, on record in released court documents is proven to have visited Epstein's island, to have gone to Epstein's mansion in New York and to have gone to Paris for his birthday. Close friend of Epstein, more so than even Prince Andrew. Right? There's more information on Mandelson's relationship with him than there even was with Prince Andrew. So why was Starmer, look at how Prince Andrew was treated, why was Starmer rewarding Mandelson with the most diplomatic appointment on the planet for Britain, which is to America, right? Granting him diplomatic immunity is what it was about. So that's how far up the rot goes, right to the top with Lord Ahmed and Peter Mandelson. By the way, both Labour and both from the Blair era, Mandelson was Blair's ‘dark prince’ who had all the dirt on all of the politicians and that's how he kept them in line, it's why he was called the ‘dark prince’. Where do you think he got that dirt from if not Epstein, right? So that's what was going on. Since we said all of that what got revealed? Well there was a Labour former Defence Minister who got arrested in a sting for attempting to solicit sexual favours from an underage boy, and then two police officers got arrested in Rotherham for being involved as well. This all came out after the scandal was recently resurrected by Musk. Proving that this is bigger, as you just said, Neil, than the mere street gang level. And it's not just Pakistanis. This thing is a rot that goes through the system, and is actually what people used to refer to as ‘conspiracy theory’. It's the global VIP pedophile ring that used to be run by Epstein, which is an acknowledged Mossad operation.”Something tells us this is not the end of the underage rape gang or Epstein scandals in the UK. The Shadow knows. Subscribe now2) Assassination of Popular US MAGA Campaigner Charlie Kirk The popular American MAGA campus campaigner Charlie Kirk has been assassinated. The killer remains at large and a manhunt is underway. Kirk himself had raised concerns about the rise of ’assassination culture’ in the US.And then he was assassinated on campus.Reactions so far have been polarising, furthering the very cultural divides that Charlie Kirk was known for wrestling with.The fact that the killer has not yet been apprehended raises many questions. And the video of the shooting appears to indicate that the perpetrator could have been a professional sniper, or at the very least a trained sharp shooter. Leading many of Kirk’s oldest friends to ask uncomfortable questions. Some directly laid the blame on Israel, because Kirk had recently fallen out with many of his previous allies over Israel’s ongoing war in Gaza.What these voices point to in terms of evidence are the below recent stances taken by Kirk.Click to play:Megyn Kelly: “The 25 text messages from people I know, like friends, who are pro-Israel, like, I'm so sad that you've left us. I'm so sad. Let's debate it. You know, many Jewish advocates saying, let me come on your show and we'll debate. You know, many Jewish advocates saying, let me come on your show and we'll debate. There's nothing to debate. I'm on Israel's side. Just stop! Me observing…”Charlie Kirk: “I totally agree”. Megyn Kelly: “….That you're losing the propaganda war and that this has gone on for about two years now. And look, I mean, I pulled the stats, support for Israel's military action in Gaza by Party ID. GOP in June of 2024, 76%. Now 71, so they lost 5%. Dems in October of 2023, 36%. Now it's at 8%. Independents: October, 2023, it was 47%. Now it's 25%. You go under 35, you have almost zero support across the United States, your closest ally. I see what's happening and it's my job to comment honestly on it. But I am sick of being lectured on like, ‘you have to see it exactly as we see it and support everything or you're against us’.”Charlie Kirk: “So, so this is so important, Megyn. And again, I don't want not every, you cannot say every one of the pro Israel… and I don't say it acts that way, but I, I got texts about you, Megyn, Saying, ‘why is Megyn like doing the bidding of Hamas?’ I was like, ‘what are you talking about? Megyn’s the best. Like what? She's amazing’. And I said, ‘why are you texting me about Megyn?’ And I, at that point, and so this is what they don't understand. You and I, Megyn, and Tucker is in the same category, and they've tried to go after Tucker, is that, and the more you attack our moral character, the actually the more we're gonna double down in the direction because screw you, I don't do it that way, okay? Like when, tell me I'm wrong, cool. Tell me if I got my facts wrong. By the way, on the Epstein thing, Naftali Bennett says he wasn't an Epstein agent. We have to be pursuers of truth, they've denied it, fine. Let's keep digging, okay, fine. But the thing that I don't think, I think is being lost is like on some part of the population, you can scold them into silence, right? But if I have any deviation of a purity test, any deviation whatsoever, such as hosting a focus group, riight Megyn, with a bunch of our students that went viral, having Dave Smith or Tucker at my event, it is all of a sudden: ‘Oh Charlie is…no longer with us and all that, I said: ‘wait a second what do you mean?’, what does ‘with us’ mean exactly, right? I'm an American, okay, like I represent this country, and I don't even understand that paradigm, but Megyn I think you would agree with this, I want to make sure we fast like, really zero in on this. Personality types like you, myself, and Tucker, the more that you guys privately and publicly call our character into question, which is not isolated, right? Megyn, it would be one thing if it was one text or two texts. It is dozens of texts, then we start to say, ‘hold the boat here’. And to be fair, some of my really good Jewish friends are like, that's not all of us, it's all, but these are leaders too though, right? These are stakeholders, right? And so look, I'm afraid because again, I want civilisation to win. I want the West to win. I don't want the Islamofascist barbarians to storm the gates of Jerusalem. I want the holy sites protected. I believe in the Holy Land. I love that Jesus walked on water there and rose from the dead and preached in the Mount of Beatitudes. I feel the connection to Israel. But at the same time, simultaneously, when the hostile reaction is that now Megyn and Charlie are enemies? Boy, I'll tell you, like, you're not going to, I wouldn't say lose, but you will weaken and just basically deflate two of your strongest advocates if that continues.”British MAGA supporters have also been commenting in a similar vein. Click to play:Charlie Kirk: “Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them. Now, I don't like generalisations. Not every Jewish person believes that. But it is true the Anti-Defamation League was part and parcel with Black Lives Matter. It is true that some of the largest financiers of left-wing anti-white causes have been Jewish Americans. They went all in on woke and it wasn't just ADL. It was some of the top Jewish organisations in the country that have done that. In fact, we have seen this with the recent retreat of Jewish donations that are no longer going to be administered to colleges. Right. Mark Rowan, Leon Kopperman. Can we get that full list? Very powerful. So that's totally true. And by the way, Tucker Carlson reinforces this. So I'm going to kind of, it was quite a day on the Internet. Tucker Carlson was interviewing Candace Owens. We have Candace Owens coming up next hour. And Tucker Carlson mentions that Jewish Americans have primarily been financing cultural Marxist ideas. We said this, by the way, last week and people came after us, we actually said in a different way we said ‘I'm glad that Jewish Americans are reconsidering their financing of cultural marxism’ and people misunderstood it, intentionally, and slandered us as being anti-semites, but listen to this Tucker Carlson is completely correct by saying this that the philosophical foundation of anti-whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors…”With clips such as the below featuring heavily in online MAGA circles. Click to play:Charlie Kirk: “..Interestingly which is, ‘okay, Charlie we've pushed back against the media on Covid, on lockdowns, on Ukraine, on the border, on it's like, maybe we should also ask a question: is the media totally presenting the truth when it comes to Israel?’ Just a question, you know that maybe we shouldn't believe everything the media says because I know I've been conditioned to ask a lot more critical questions over the last couple of years. So Ben, some people would accuse Israel of wanting to ethnically cleanse..”Evidence on this all is still rapidly emerging, and full story may never fully be revealed. Once thing is certain though, now is not the time to lose our heads. To continue reading our discussion on Rudyard Kipling and to gain access to all other paywalled content, become a premium member of Radical Media. Read more

BREAKING: Midazolam Inquest Suspended Early After Expert Witness Humiliates Royal Trinity Hospice

This Radical Dispatch Newszine - below - is provided free for all subscribers.At the top of this post, Resistance Radio presents our WARRIOR CREED video/audio podcast from Tuesday 15th August 2025, with a transcript provided - BREAKING: Midazolam Inquest Suspended Early After Expert Witness Humiliates Royal Trinity Hospice.This podcast can be set to either audiovisual, or just audio, and is for premium members of Radical Media only. To listen, basic members should upgrade to the premium service here:ShareRead on now for our free Radical Dispatch.Subscribe nowShareBREAKING: Midazolam Inquest Suspended Early After Expert Witness Humiliates Royal Trinity Hospice- A Radical DispatchEXCLUSIVE BREAKING NEWS, 28th August 2025:DATE SET for suspended Midazolam-death inquest into Derek Dimmock. Radical Media reports from patient Derek Dimmock’s son Paul: “The inquest will proceed at Southwark Coroner’s Court on 1st, 2nd, 4th and 5th December 2025”This is a public inquiry. All are, respectfully, welcome. Radical Media will once again publish our daily live notes on proceedings.Original article 17th August 2025: 1) Midazolam Death Inquest Suspended Early Without ReasonIn breaking news, the medical inquest into the potentially precedent-setting Midazolam death case of Derek Dimmock at the Royal Trinity Hospice (RTH) has been suspended a day early without Senior Coroner Dr Julian Morris providing any reason. After resuming ten minutes past schedule at 10:10am on Friday morning 15th August 2025, coroner Morris rose only 20 minutes after opening the session. One of the country’s leading palliative care experts - an expert witness for the family - Professor Sam Ahmedzai was physically in attendance at Southwark Coroner’s Court on Friday 15th August for 10am and was on the docket, ready to testify.Click to play:Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED: “And welcome back to some breaking news on WARRIOR CREED for an out of schedule live stream. Those of you who follow Radical Media will be aware that we've been live posting our notes from the court at the Midazolam death inquest of Derek Dimmock, which was being presided over by senior coroner Dr Julian Morris from Southwark Coroner's Court in London. And the breaking news, as is in the title of the show today, ‘Midazolam Inquest Suspended Early After Expert Witness Humiliates Royal Trinity Hospice’. That's the topic. for today's stream. And indeed, that's the breaking news. The coroner, Dr. Julian Morris, in a surprise move, suspended the inquest today with an entire day scheduled remaining. And that was today, Friday remaining. The court presumably now sits empty. That's the main court at Southwark Coroner's Court. The witnesses, the expert witnesses were in attendance. Professor Sam Ahmadzai, one of the country's leading palliative care or end-of-life care academics, was present on behalf of the family. Dr Das, the court-appointed expert, was present. They were ready in the courtroom. They were scheduled on the docket to testify today. And then after merely 20 minutes, the coroner, in a surprise move, suspended the medical inquest. You can see the news on your screens now. Medical inquest into the Midazolam death of Derek Dimmock has concluded its second leg after only 20 minutes without hearing from the listed expert witnesses. It is set to resume sometime between December 2025 and February 2026. Many observers including the Dimmock family are very surprised that expert witnesses Professor Sam Ahmedzai (for the family) and Dr Das (court appointed) who were listed for today were not heard, with the entire day in court now remaining free.”In an earlier sign of intent missed by most, the coroner had indicated that he would postpone the court appointed expert Dr Das. It had been assumed that this was to ensure reasonable time for the family expert Professor Sam Ahmedzai, a reasonable assumption since Professor Ahmedzai remained on the schedule. But the coroner thwarted all such assumptions by aborting proceedings entirely, and later reportedly twice refused to provide media with his reasons for aborting proceedings early.Matters so shocked the Dimmock family, whom justice has eluded now for an inordinate six years since the death of their loved one Derek, that they decided to publicly complain to the Chief Coroner The Dimmock family letter is republished below in full. Above is the Dimmock family formal letter of complaint to the UK Chief Coroner as two image files, and below is the same as a PDF document available for free to download.Urgent And Important Morris139KB ∙ PDF fileDownloadDownloadThe letter raises a series of allegations to the Chief Coroner Alexia Durran about Senior Coroner Dr Julian Morris showing bias toward the barrister for the RTH Amanda Wright-Klugar. Radical Media reports 18th March 2025: This is to the extent that the Dimmock family declare in their letter they have official court audio of coroner Morris “giggling” with Wright-Klugar while still in the court chamber during recesses. As of time of writing, the Dimmock family await a response to their complaint. Subscribe now2) Expert Witness Dr Corbett Humiliates Royal Trinity Hospice as Criminal Charges are Feared Being provided no reason for the Senior Coroner’s early suspension of this public inquest, determining what may have occurred becomes a matter of public interest. With that in mind, Radical Media takes the view - on the strength of the available evidence to date - that the expert testimony provided on the previous day three by family witness Dr Kevin Corbett was so damning that the Senior Coroner had no choice but to rise to consider its potentially criminal implications on the case. The specifics of the damning evidence provided by Dr Corbett that so terrified RTH barrister Wright-Klugar were chronologically documented via Radical Media’s unofficial live note taking. Dr Corbett questioned the notes provided by RTH medical staff that appear to give the impression that patient Dimmock had been examined face to face by doctors, at a time that was prior to his recorded arrival at the Hospice. Dr Corbett went on to explain under oath that there is simply no way to be able to calculate how much Midazolam was injected into the patient Derek Dimmock, because the amount that RTH medical staff discarded was not even recorded in three out of the four prescriptions.Upon having this explained by Dr Corbett in some detail, even the coroner had to express that he finally understood Dr Corbett’s submitted evidence.So panicked did RTH’s barrister Wright-Klugar become at Dr Corbett’s evidence being heard by the court that she applied to the Senior Coroner to have Corbett excluded entirely.At this, the Senior Coroner took his lunch break to consider his ruling. But this late-stage ambush failed. In a severe blow to the Royal Trinity Hospice the coroner returned to announce that Dr Corbett did indeed qualify as a court expert on certain crucial nursing matters, and on those matters his evidence would indeed be permitted to remain. From Radical Media’s live notes:Dr Corbett’s level of expertise had been called into question by Wright-Klugar on a very significant national legal stage. In the end, Dr Corbett’s heroic NHS career - which included working as an NHS palliative care nurse on wards during the peak of the global 1980s AIDS crises - spoke for itself. So struck was RTH barrister Wright-Klugar at this legal blow to her case that she requested a renewed 5 minute emergency break, which turned into an unscheduled 20 minutes.From Radical Media’s live notes:Click to play:Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED: "Dr. Corbett's evidence yesterday. Now, this comes to when we just explained after reading the first half of the letter that the only reason that remains logically plausible on the strength of the evidence as to why this delay, that has remained unexplained by omission by the coroner, as to why this delay occurred, the only logical reason is that the strength of the evidence yesterday of Dr. Kevin Corbett was such that it meant, and it was so strong in terms of its implications, that it meant the coroner and counsel for the Royal Trinity Hospice, barrister Wright-Kluger, needed time to digest the implications of Dr. Corbett's evidence. And Wright-Kluger may have needed extra time to prepare a proper defense for the Royal Trinity Hospice, because Dr. Corbett's evidence was damning. And we're going to come to that evidence from our notes, live notes that we published yesterday, and show you exactly what was so damning about it." As the RTH barrister failed to secure the dismissal of Dr Corbett’s testimony she had to resume her cross-examination of him, but the more Corbett responded the worse it became for the Royal Trinity Hospice. Wright-Klugar quickly realised that the best way to proceed was to stop attempting to catch out this “forensic nurse” who had previously worked with the London Metropiltan police.Upon Wright-Klugar then suggesting that the hospice policy may simply state that only the “amount administered” should be logged, Dr Corbett challenged her confidently.Taken in combination with an admission made on day three of the inquest by Dr Lund, the Medical Director for RTH, that she had destroyed the hospice’s drug stock record book after being made aware of the complaint by the Dimmock family, and the Dimmock case now appears to be veering very close to a potential criminal investigation. From Radical Media’s notes:Click to play:Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED: “Now the medical director of the Royal Trinity Hospice on day three admitted that they were aware of the Dimmock family complaint raised about the death of Derek Dimmock and yet still decided to destroy the hospital's medical record book. Dr. Lund was personally aware and decided to destroy the stock book. That's the drug stock book...Now put two and two together, all of you watching. Don't look at us. Just put two and two together. Dr. Corbett said the amount discarded from the so-called faulty syringe drivers wasn't recorded, which it wasn't in the first three prescriptions for Derek Dimmock. Only in the fourth prescription given to him was the amount discarded, recorded. And therefore, it's impossible to work out how much of Midazolam and morphine (Radical Media note: or any other opioid) was injected into Derek Dimmock during those first three prescriptions because the amount discarded was not recorded. But you know where you could work out? The amount discarded from, from the original stock that was in the medical cupboard for the Royal Trinity Hospice. And Dr. Lund just testified that despite being aware of Derek Dimmock's, sorry, Paul Dimmock, the Dimmock family's complaint about the death of Derek Dimmock, despite being aware of that complaint, she proceeded to destroy that medical stock book. Now imagine we had that medical stock book. You would have known how much Midazolam they had to start with. And so even if the amount discarded hadn't been recorded, you could then work out how much was put into Derek Dimmock. (Radical Media note: you would know at least, the amount missing that was unaccounted for).”The potential criminal consequences become more apparent when considering that the doctor who was on the ward the night of Derek Dimmock’s death had previously audited the hundreds of opioid misuse deaths that occurred at the Gosport War Memorial Hospital. CIick to play:Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED: “What could possibly be the implications of Dr. Corbett's evidence yesterday and how damning they are? What could possibly require so much extra time? Well, the issue is… if there are clear criminal implications in what's been revealed via Dr. Corbett's evidence, in other words, death due to criminal culpability, and we're not saying there are, we're saying if there are, then of course the coroner will need time to consider that based upon yesterday's evidence. And the coroner already twice alluded to, by using the word to James Bogle KC for the family, he said, you don't want me to caution the Trinity Hospice witness, do you? Now, why would he say that? Because by cautioning a witness, he's reading them their “rights” - known as the Miranda rights for example - because the witness may end up incriminating themselves. That statement made by the coroner to James Bogle KC, a counsel on behalf of the family, the Dimmock family. That statement was made on day four (Radical Media correction: it was made on day three). And he said explicitly, you don't want me to caution the Trinity Hospice witnesses, do you? Because if you carry on, I may have to alluding to the point that they may end up incriminating themselves. After Dr. Kevin Corbett presented his evidence, it became clear that this falls within the remit of consideration, at least, as to whether we're witnessing the unfolding of a criminal investigation, because Gospert Hospital was referenced this morning by the cross-examination…of the doctor that was on the ward the night Derek Derek died, Dr. Wright… In that cross-examination, Bogle revealed that Dr. Wright, who was on duty that night, Derek Dimmock died on the ward…had previously done an audit of the deaths at Gosport Hospital, which were deaths involving the overuse and misuse of opioids. And Dr. Wright had been fully aware of that because she had audited those deaths upon being asked, as she testified to in the 20 minutes this morning. Now, the interesting point is that those deaths at Gosport Hospital are subject to a criminal investigation. That's very interesting.”Dr Wright would presumably therefore be fully aware of the subsequent criminal investigation that followed at Gosport. Radical Media reports 23rd April 2025:Not least because, as reported by independent journalist Jacqui Deevoy whose early efforts contributed to alerting Radical Media to the Midazolam scandal, the government had already declared an open warning on an official government page in October 2021 that the concerned syringe drivers used by the RTH on Derek Dimmock may suffer from serious faults, rendering them unreliable.UK government reports 19th October 2021:So did the Royal Trinity Hospice receive a ‘Field Safety Notice’ and if so, what did they do about it? Here is the PDF document of this government guidance on T34 syringe drivers available for download. T34 Syringe Pump Guidance For Gov Uk146KB ∙ PDF fileDownloadDownloadIt is no wonder then that the Dimmock family barrister James Bogle KC recently broke his silence and personally came to the conclusion that this appears to have been a systemic nationwide problem. Click to play:Dimmock family barrister James Bogle KC: “The favoured way of shortening a life, let’s put it that way, rather than putting it anymore controversially, is to use in combination morphine and Midazolam. Midazolam is a sedative and morphine is an opiate. Or morphine is used to eliminate pain and Midazolam is used to sedate you, ostensibly to calm you down. The combination of the two is a very effective way of shortening somebody’s life. And what happens is, the doses go up and up and up, the patient dies and nobody really knows ‘did he die from dehydration? Did he die from malnutrition? Did he die from his underlying condition? Or did he die from having an increased dose of morphine and Midazolam?’ …This is why I said earlier, if you want to kill somebody, get a doctor or a nurse to do it, because it's very, very difficult to pin the blame on them. And the use of morphine and Midazolam as a regular feature of treatment of the terminally ill, of the sick, of the chronically sick and elderly in the NHS is now very common. I myself, with my own mother, when I went down to visit her in hospital, I said to the doctor, can I have a look at the medical, sorry, the drug chart? And the consultant said, ‘well, why do you want to do it?’ ..’I just would like to see it, if you don't mind’. Sure enough, she was being given morphine and Midazolam. And I had earlier said to the doctor, ‘is she in pain?’ ‘No, she's not.’ Well, is she... ‘Is she thrashing about, or is she in any way requiring a sedative?’ ‘No.’ And then when I went to the drug chart, there was morphine and Midazolam.”Host Peter McCormack: “Well, that sounds like malpractice.”Dimmock family barrister James Bogle KC: “Oh, it does. But it's very easy to get around that. It's very easy for a doctor to say, ‘well, we wanted to make sure she was comfortable. We wanted to make sure that she wasn't agitated. So we gave her Midazolam’.”Subscribe now3) Midazolam Scandal Goes GlobalRecent developments have catapulted the Midazolam deaths scandal to a global audience.Dr Mary Talley Bowden recently raised the issue on a podcast episode with Joe Rogan.Click to play:Watch the full episode here.Dr Mary Talley Bowden: “There’s actually a law suite today, that's first jury trial in the country over these hospital protocols, where they had a young woman with down syndrome they basically euthanised her. They gave her a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) order even though she didn't have one, and the father has just been wonderful, it's the Shara family…”Podcast host Joe Rogan: “…why did they do that. They euthanised her for what?”Dr Bowden: “I've seen this. I have reviewed records from these hospital patients, and they'll euthanise them. They need the bed. They say, well, they're going to die anyway.”Rogan: “What was this person in the hospital for?”Dr Bowden: “Covid. COVID protocol.”Rogan: “And they... wait, wait, wait. So they were in the hospital with COVID, and they gave them something to kill them?”Dr Bowden: “Yeah. That happened all the... I'm sorry, but... I mean, that happened. People, they give them morphine and insulin...yeah, yeah.”Rogan: “That's common?”Dr Bowden: “Yeah, yeah. I've reviewed charts. In this situation, they gave her a DNR, which is do not resuscitate, meaning if they look like they're dying, you don't do anything, which that was not the case. So they're suing for battery, which is one way of getting around the PREP Act, because the PREP Act is very hard to penetrate. The PREP Act protects everybody, all the doctors, all the hospitals, from any wrongdoing during COVID. So it's been this big challenge trying to get around the PREP Act. And this case has hope of getting around the PREP Act, because they're charging for battery. And they're in trial. It started today. It's in Wisconsin. So that gives me hope.”Meanwhile, new Canadian research has arrived at the same conclusions as last year’s peer reviewed statistical analysis by Dr Wilson Sy - exclusively interviewed by Radical Media here - by stating that the April 2020 death spike could not have occurred naturally.This corroborates the view that the April 2020 death spike was “iatrogenic”, or caused by the medical intervention itself.Slay news reports 1st July 2025:Slay news reports 1st July 2025:“The 400-page report, authored by researchers Joseph Hickey, Denis Rancourt, and Christian Linard, lays out a case that the deadly first wave from March to May 2020 was not a natural pandemic. It was a manmade medical disaster. ‘Where excess mortality occurred, it was of institutional and iatrogenic origin, caused by mistreatment of frail and vulnerable people in hospitals and nursing homes,’ the report states. In plain English, people died because of the way they were treated, not because of a contagious virus.”The conclusion that these April 2020 deaths were “iatrogenic”, or caused by the medical intervention itself, is one that Dr Wilson Sy came to in his peer-reviewed statistical analysis over a year ago.Radical Media reports 22nd February 2024:Here is that new Canadian paper followed by a brief synopsis of its findings.Correlation reports 13th June 2025:“CORRELATION has published a new report entitled “Constraints from geotemporal evolution of all-cause mortality on the hypothesis of disease spread during Covid” authored by Joseph Hickey, Denis G. Rancourt, and Christian Linard. Using high-resolution geotemporal all-cause mortality data, the authors show that mortality patterns during March-May 2020 in Europe and the USA are incompatible with the dominant paradigm of having been caused by person-to-person spread of a novel infectious virus.”In Ireland now too - exactly as Dr Wilson Sy’s statistical analysis concluded over a year ago - recent ‘protected disclosures’ have revealed that Midazolam administration in nursing homes perfectly correlates with death spikes in April 2020.Click to play:Guest: “In the nursing home, there were no protocols for the care of these people. In the hospitals they had been getting treatment, but when they arrived in the nursing homes there was no protocol for treatment, and this is one of the things that you may recall Dr Marcus de Brun spoke about when you interviewed him recently. In fact, he was so incensed by this policy that he actually resigned from the medical council because he saw that there were no treatment protocols. And the only thing that they were given was end-of-life care like ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ and they were, and they were given drugs like Midazolam. And I don't know if you know about Midazolam, and I don't know if the viewers…it's an end-of-life drug. It speeds up your death. It causes kidney failure. It's a horrific drug. Not only that but, it is a respiratory suppressant. So why would anybody give Midazolam to a patient that suppresses their respiratory system, when we are supposed to be in the midst of a respiratory crisis like COVID? It simply doesn't make sense. So this was a very, very bizarre policy. Now, it's not clear who directed the protocols for the care, or the end of life care. But what in effect happened was that in April of 2020, there was a spike in deaths in nursing homes in Ireland.”Counterpoint host Eddie Hobbs: “Can I bring up my slide now?”Guest: “Yes, please.”Eddie Hobbs: “Okay, thank you.”Guest: “Thank you.”Eddie Hobbs: “I wanted to get to this slide as fast as possible.”Guest: “Thank you very much. This is a slide. And by the way, this is a slide which is contained in this protected disclosures document. And that's why I'm using it. And so for the viewer can see that the dark, thick lines represent the deaths that took place. And as you can see, you know, fourth in from the bottom, April 2020, there is...Obviously, a very massive spike in death. I mean, it's very, very clear. And then coincidentally, the thinner line, which in reality follows it, it's red in reality. You can see it exactly. There's a huge spike then of that thinner line. That thinner line represents the administration of Midazolam.”The Midazolam scandal has gone global. The story is now too big to contain.Subscribe now4) Who is Responsible for the Deaths?By posting above on twitter “...was borderline illegal..very keen we keep the system/approach that killed >100K (over one hundred thousand) unnecessarily so next time there’s a deadly crisis we kill even more.” what did PM Johnson’s de-facto Chief of Staff Dominic Cummings mean, and how much did he know? His actions subsequent to departing government certainly read as if he believes that the entire Johnson leadership team is responsible. i) Covid-era Health Secretary Matt HacockThe ongoing covid inquiry has at least revealed that the former Health Secretary Matt Hancock has accepted responsibility for the decisions made that led to this unmitigated disaster. Many victim-families will be inclined to interpret this as criminal responsibility.Click to play:Cross-examiner: “Can I turn, please, to ask you about the hospital discharge policy, Mr Hancock? And at the outset, can we be clear, was it one person's decision?”Covid-era Health Secretary Matt Hancock: “No.”Cross-examiner: “Who or which department's decision was it?”Matt Hancock: “Well, it was formally a government decision. It was signed off by the Prime Minister. It was really driven by Simon Stevens, the chief executive of the NHS. But it was widely discussed, both in the department, with the NHS and with the centre.”Cross-examiner: “You said in your statement, in fact, that...NHS England insisted on the policy.”Matt Hancock: “Yes.”Cross-examiner: “And you later in your statement said, ‘although I did not take the decision, I take responsibility for it’.”Matt Hancock: “Yes, for two reasons. The first is it was a decision of the government and I was the... Secretary of State. And I take responsibility for all of the decisions in the area that I was responsible for. The second is that whilst this is obviously an incredibly contentious issue, as I also said in my statement, nobody has yet provided me with an alternative that was available at the time that would have saved more lives. There are things that we can do now and indeed should have been doing for the last three years since this inquiry was set up, to make sure we're better prepared. And we went through some of those right at the start. But obviously having... wracked my brains about this and thought about it incredibly hard and in preparation for this inquiry having gone through all of the paperwork, I still can't see a decision that would have been less bad. None of the options were good.”Cross-examiner: “Do I take it that it was, from your perspective, the least bad decision, the least worst decision?”Matt Hancock: “That's exactly my view, is that it's the least worst decision that could have been taken at the time.”Cross-examiner: “But it was a decision nonetheless that you agreed with at the time?”Matt Hancock: “I accepted it. I wasn't the driving force, but it was the decision of the government, yes.”Cross-examiner: “…question I asked you, was it a decision you agreed with at the time?”Matt Hancock: “Yes, yes. I defended it at the time. And whilst I wish that there had been a better option, I still can't find one.”ii) Chief Medical Officer Chris WhittyLikewise, Hancock’s covid-era Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty has also now accepted responsibility, while previously having denied it.Telegraph reports 30th June 2025:iii) Tory MP Dr Luke EvansAnother who should be held to account is Dr Luke Evans MP, the Tory parliamentarian who encouraged Hancock as Health Secretary to pre-order sufficient supplies of Midazolam prior to the “Covid” outbreak.Click to play:Dr Luke Evans MP, April 2020: “…a ‘good death’ needs three things. It needs equipment, it needs medication and it meeds the staff to administer it. So in terms of equipment, a few quick questions. Do you have enough syringe drivers in the NHS to deliver medications to keep people comfortable when they're passing away?”Matt Hancock MP: “Yes, we do. There was a challenge raised about this about eight days ago, and we resolved that actually it wasn't as big a challenge as as was made public, and we've resolved that. So yes, right now we do”.Dr Luke Evans MP: “And the second one is with that, that's the syringe drivers deliver medication, particularly things like Midazolam and morphine. Do you have any precautions put in place to make sure we have enough of those medications to be delivered?”Matt Hancock MP: “Yes, we've got a big project to make sure that those sorts of medications, as well as the ITU medications that I spoke about earlier, that the supply chains, the global supply chains for all those medicines are clear. They are, in fact, those medicines are made in a relatively small number of factories around the world. So it is a delicate supply chain and we are in contact with the whole supply chain.”Dr Luke Evans MP: “And in line with that, morphine is currently prescribed per patient. The reason to do that is to stop it being abused. So I have to prescribe it for Mr. Hancock. However, in this situation, if you're going into a healthcare home, you may not want to waste precious things like morphine. Have you considered relaxing the laws around morphine prescribing for doctors and healthcare professionals so that there isn't waste?”Matt Hancock MP: “That’s something that we keep under review. I’ve looked at that particular point to reduce wastage of key medicines, and it’s something that he supply chain, the supply team sorry, in the department and the clinical team talk about all the time. I don't know if that's JVT's (Jonathan Van-Tam) part of the clinical team and he may want to say more.”Likewise, Chief Science Officer Jonathan Van-Tam should not be so easily forgotten.To access the Parliamentary source transcript for above video dated April 2020 click here:Curiously, and as Radical Media has previously highlighted, this is the same Dr Luke Evans who was out campaigning for then Tory councillor Amanda Wright-klugar, who is now the barrister representing the Royal Trinity Hospice at the Derek Dimmock inquest.iv) CEO of NICE Sir Andrew DillonAnother who must accept responsibility is Sir Andrew Dillon, who was Chief Executive at the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the body that devised the NG163 Midazolam protocol.Interestingly, Sir Andrew quit as the CEO of NICE in March 2020, one month before the huge April 2020 excess death spike.HSJ reports 22nd August 2019:Sir Andrew Dillon then went on to become a Director at the Royal Trinity Hospice, which is where Derek Dimmock died after being administered Midazolam.Rather suspiciously, again, Sir Andrew quit from the Royal Trinity Hospice only one day after the medical inquest into Derek Dimmock’s death began.Derek Dimmock’s medical inquest began on 17th March 2025. Here is the Companies House entry stating the date of Sir Andrew Dillon’s resignation, on 18th March.It looks like Sir Andrew is on the run. What does he have to hide?The wider allegation being made by victim-families is that during Covid the British state implemented a deliberate and systemic policy of involuntary mass euthanasia of the elderly in hospitals and care homes by administering the end of life protocol drug Midazolam plus an opioid, while using Covid deaths as cover for this mass killing.If ruled by the senior coroner as ‘unlawful killing’ in this precedent setting case, the United Kingdom will be rocked by the worst mass killing scandal in its history.Radical Media attended Committee Room 5 in the UK House of Commons in June 2023 to hear from 50 victim-families who believe that their loved ones had been similarly involuntarily euthanised.No official recordings from this parliamentary hearing have ever been made available.Even though the parliamentary sign from the day of the hearing stated “broadcasting.”But Radical Media has provided our own free raw audio file of these 50 family member testimonies in Parliament from June 2023 below….To continue reading, gain access to the WARRIOR CREED podcast and other exclusive paywalled content, become a premium member of Radical Media here… Read more

UK Threatens to Recognise Palestine As Israeli Intel Chiefs Demand Netanyahu STOP THE WAR

This Radical Dispatch Newszine - below - is provided free for all subscribers.At the top of this post, Resistance Radio presents our WARRIOR CREED video/audio podcast from Tuesday 5th August 2025, with a transcript provided - UK Threatens to Recognise Palestine As Israeli Intel Chiefs Demand Netanyahu STOP THE WAR.This podcast can be set to either audiovisual, or just audio, and is for premium members of Radical Media only. To listen, basic members should upgrade to the premium service here:ShareRead on now for our free Radical Dispatch.Subscribe nowShareUK Threatens to Recognise Palestine As Israeli Intel Chiefs Demand Netanyahu STOP THE WAR- A Radical Dispatch1) Unilateral Recognition for a Palestinian State The British Prime Minister has threatened to unilaterally recognise the state of Palestine by September unless Israel agrees to certain conditions such as “substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire, and commit to a long-term sustainable peace, reviving the prospect of a two-state solution”.Click to play:PM Starmer: “On the 7th of October 2023, Hamas perpetrated the worst massacre in Israel's history. Every day since then, the horror has continued. The hostages are still being held today. The Palestinian people have endured terrible suffering. Now, in Gaza, because of a catastrophic failure of aid, we see starving babies, children too weak to stand, images that will stay with us for a lifetime. The suffering must end. Yesterday I discussed this with President Trump, and we're mounting a major effort to get humanitarian supplies back in by air. And UK aid has been airdropped into Gaza today, and crucially, by land. We need to see at least 500 trucks entering Gaza every day. Ultimately, the only way to bring this humanitarian crisis to an end is through a long-term settlement. So we are supporting the US, Egyptian, and Qatari efforts to secure a vital ceasefire. That ceasefire must be sustainable, and it must lead to a wider peace plan, which we're developing with our international partners. This plan will deliver security and proper governance in Gaza. and pave the way for negotiations on a two-state solution. Our goal remains a safe and secure Israel alongside a viable and sovereign Palestinian state. But right now, that goal is under pressure like never before. I've always said that we will recognise a Palestinian state as a contribution to a proper peace process at the moment of maximum impact for the two-state solution. With that solution now under threat, this is the moment to act. So today, as part of this process towards peace, I can confirm the UK will recognise the state of Palestine by the United Nations General Assembly in September unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire, and commit to a long-term sustainable peace, reviving the prospect of a two-state solution. And this includes allowing the UN to restart the supply of aid and making clear that there will be no annexations in the West Bank.”As summarised in the below clip, this Radical Dispatch provides analysis on these developments and what they mean for Netanyahu’s future inside Israel. Click to play:Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED: “The topic today, in summary, will cover the threats of unilateral recognition for a Palestinian state by UK and allies. That includes Canada, Malta, potentially Germany, adding to the list of countries such as Spain, Ireland and Norway that have already unilaterally recognised Palestine. And we'll give you our analysis on that take while demonstrating, as we said…only a week after the October the 7th attacks that Netanyahu has overplayed his hand. Now, these unilateral demands for recognition or threats, we should say, for recognition of a Palestinian state come amidst internal domestic turmoil for Netanyahu and his war policy. As again, during the course of this stream, we will show you video of eyewitness testimony by a wounded Israeli soldier who served at the Gaza border on October the 7th, who testifies in the Knesset, we will show you the video, who testifies that the IDF were given a stand-down order on the night of October the 7th, instructing them not to man the border that night until 9am the next morning. Yes, you heard that correctly. Video testimony in the Israeli parliament by a wounded soldier, who served on the Gaza border on the night of October the 7th, testifying that the IDF received a ‘stand down’ order on the night of October the 7th instructing them not to defend the Gaza border by patrolling it until 9 am the next morning. Of course, once the attack began that night, they jumped out of their beds at dawn, as he testifies, to try and fight back Hamas. But this down-down order had already been given and they were not at the border in time. That testimony corroborates what we here at Radical Media via Warrior Creed and other platforms have been alleging from the 2023, the very month of the attacks, October the 7th attacks in 2023, that this was an attack, yes, by Hamas, funded, yes, by Iran, but facilitated and funded also by Netanyahu and the Likudnik-Zionists, for the purposes of providing a pretext for Netanyahu and his Likudnik faction to invade and annex Gaza. We're going to prove all that with receipts over the course of this stream, including with eyewitness testimonies, and we'll give you our analysis on why these unilateral declarations for a Palestinian state by Prime Minister Starmer and others, globalists, will fall short and remain gesture politics unless and until they occur within a recognised regional framework for peace. That regional framework already exists. The framework is called the Abraham Accords.”In promising to recognise Palestine, the UK joined Ireland, Spain and Norway who already did last year, alongside Slovenia. Click to play:PM of Ireland Simon Harris “..on these same steps with Prime Minister Sanchez of Spain, and we said that the point of recognising the state of Palestine was coming closer. That point has now arrived. Today, Ireland, Norway and Spain are announcing that we recognise the state of Palestine. Each of us will now undertake whatever national steps are necessary to give effect to that decision. In the lead up to today's announcement, I've spoken with a number of other leaders and counterparts, and I'm confident that further countries will join us in taking this important step in the coming weeks. This is an historic and important day for Ireland and for Palestine. On the 21st of January 1919, Ireland asked the world to recognize our right to be an independent state. Our message to the free nations of the world was a plea for international recognition of our independence, emphasising our distinct national identity, our historical struggle and our right to self-determination and justice. Today, we use the same language to support the recognition of Palestine as a state. We do so because we believe in freedom and justice as the fundamental principles of international law. And because we believe that permanent peace can only be secured upon the basis of the free will of a free people.”The UK’s announcement also appears to have then set off a renewed effort by other countries to follow suit. These included Malta:And Canada:Click to play:Canadian PM Mark Carney: “The level of human suffering in Gaza is intolerable. Canada has long been committed to a two-state solution. An independent, viable and sovereign Palestinian state living side by side with the state of Israel in peace and security. For decades, it was hoped that this outcome would be achieved as part of a peace process built around a negotiated settlement between the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority. Regrettably, this approach is no longer tenable. For the reasons I cited earlier, Canada intends to recognise the state of Palestine at the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly in September 2025. This intention is predicated on the Palestinian Authority's commitment to much-needed reforms, including commitments by the Palestinian Authority's President Abbas to fundamentally reform its governance, to hold general elections in 2026, in which Hamas can play no part, and to demilitarise the Palestinian state. Canada will increase its efforts in supporting strong democratic governance in Palestine and the contributions of its people to a more peaceful and hopeful future.”Germany was rumoured to be considering a similar declaration while the Israeli National Security Minister accused such support of equating to “returning to support Nazism”.Meanwhile, Netanyahu seems to be living in denial while posturing to annex and rule Gaza on behalf of Israel. Click to play:Israeli PM Netanyahu: “All the massacres against Jews were preceded by horrible vilifications. The lies that were levelled against the Jews spread around the globe. We were poisoning the wells. We were carriers of disease. We slaughtered Christian children in order to drink their blood. And this spread from country to country and created massacre after massacre, culminating in the worst massacre of them all, the Holocaust, in which six million innocent Jews were led to the slaughter. Today, the Jewish state is facing similar vilifications. They lie about us. They say that we're deliberately starving Palestinian children. That's a barefaced lie. Since the beginning of the war, we have let in almost two million tons of food. Two million tons of food for Palestinian civilians, Palestinian children. That's been our policy. But in the last few months, this humanitarian aid has been interdicted by Hamas looting. They steal the food from their own people. But in the last few months, that food has not been reaching the Palestinian civilians because Hamas is stealing it. So we've decided to go around it. I've authorized the Israeli Air Force to airdrop humanitarian food and medical supplies to Palestinian civilians. We invited other countries to join these airdrops, and many have. We also designated safe corridors to which these trucks can travel without being looted by Hamas or endangered by combat activity. And we're talking now to our American friends about further steps to alleviate any possibility of hunger or the appearance of hunger. We're committed to doing this just as we're committing to free Gaza from the tyranny of these terrorists. Many Gazans come to us and they say, help us be free. Help us be free of Hamas, of their terror, of their cruelty, of their tyranny. And that's what we will do.”So in-denial, out of touch and isolated has Israeli PM Netanyahu become that his own former intelligence and IDF heads have openly accused his policy of being “messianic and extremist”. Haartezt reports 4th August 2025:“A lineup of Israel's most senior former security leaders has issued an extraordinarily blunt public appeal to end the war in Gaza immediately, warning that its prolonged and grinding continuation is steering the country toward "the loss of its security and its freedom."As Israeli intellectuals begin to break their silence by openly labelling their own country’s behaviour as “genocide”. And Trump warns his Israeli donors that MAGA is turning on Israel. The Times of Israel reports 5th August 2025:The Times of Israel reports 5th August 2025:“US President Donald Trump recently warned a Jewish campaign donor that his MAGA base was beginning to turn on Israel, the Financial Times reports. ‘My people are starting to hate Israel,’ Trump is quoted as having told the unnamed donor recently, citing a Mideast expert, also unnamed, with contacts inside the Trump administration. The report describes the donor as ‘prominent.’ ‘There are people in the White House who are watching this narrative develop in the right wing, in the MAGA world, that is very anti-Israel, very anti-Jewish,’ the expert is quoted saying. The comments come as Israel has come under increasing criticism, including from Trump and other Republicans, due to images of hunger emerging from Gaza. On Monday, far-right Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, a MAGA stalwart who has promulgated antisemitic conspiracy theories and routinely calls for an end to foreign aid, called what is happening in Gaza ‘genocide’.” As Radical Media stated only twenty days after the October 7th attacks, Netanyahu has overplayed his hand.Subscribe now2) Israel Playing “Target Practice” with Palestinian ChildrenIsrael’s increased international isolation can be explained by increased awareness around the IDF’s horrific actions against civilians and children in Gaza. Eye-witness whistleblower, British surgeon Nick Maynard has gone so far as to publicly testify that the Israeli military have been using Palestinian children in food queues as “target practice” by shooting at their heads, chests and testicles on different days. Click to play:Sky News broadcaster Yalda Hakim: “NASA, for example, is one of the last remaining. We just want to show our viewers the images that you captured from the hospital where it's virtually become a frontline itself.”Dr Nick Maynard: “Yeah, so NASA, it's in the red zone, so it's surrounded by the Israeli military. Most of the time, they were probably a kilometre or a little bit more away. But for three days, about two or three weeks ago, they came within a few hundred metres of the hospital. And it was extremely tense. We were hearing the bombings, the machine gun fire, nonstop all night. Many staff left because they found it too dangerous to stay there. Patients were discharged. One patient I'd done major abdominal surgery on 12 hours previously. He left the hospital after 12 hours, and I tried to persuade him to stay, but he said, it is safer for me in my tent in Al Mawasi, and we know that's not a safe area. He said, it's safer for me there than it is in this hospital.”Sky News broadcaster Yalda Hakim: “And your colleagues, we're hearing, a lot of the staff who are working there are suffering from starvation themselves, that many of them are queuing up for the kind of food that they are treating patients for.”Dr Nick Maynard: “Absolutely, I've been to Gaza many times, so I saw some people I've known for years, some of them. I didn't recognise some of them. Two colleagues of mine had lost 20 and 30 kilograms, respectively. They were shells of what they'd been like before. They are all hungry. And they're coming into work every day, but they're then going home to their tents where they have no food. They are going. One anaesthetist I know in between operations was going to the food distribution points to get food for his family and witnessing the horrors there, witnessing the young teenage males being shot by the Israeli soldiers and seeing how chaotic that food distribution system is, Well, it's been described by the UN and others as a death trap. Those who have been there have described the situation there where the soldiers are opening fire on civilians queuing up. And I operate on many of those children. I saw young teenage boys, sometimes as young as 11, 12, 13, who had been shot at these food distribution points. They had gone there to get food for their starving families and they were being shot. And I operate on many of them. One 12-year-old boy died on the operating table when we were operating because his injuries were so severe. And what was even more distressing was the pattern of injuries that we saw, the clustering of injuries to particular body parts on certain days. So one day, they'd be coming in predominantly with gunshot wounds to the head or the neck, another day to the chest, another day to the abdomen. And I operated one day on half a dozen young boys, all of whom had severe abdominal injuries. One day, 12 days ago, four young teenage boys came in, all of whom had been shot in the testicles and deliberately so. And this is not coincidental. The clustering was far, far too obvious to be coincidental. And it seemed to us like this was almost like a game of target practice. We're going to shoot the head today, tomorrow it'll be the chest, the next day it'll be the testicles. I would never have believed this possible unless I'd witnessed this with my own eye.”This incredibly serious allegation of war crimes appears to have much supporting it in terms of corroborating evidence. Here is video of what is reported to be a small Palestinian child with a bullet lodged into the back of her head.Click to play:The BBC World Service has conducted their own research into the matter and came to similar conclusions. Click to play:The BBC World Service reports: “The BBC World Service has compiled material in over 160 cases where children have been shot in Gaza and found that in 95 cases, the child was shot in the head or the chest. In most of these cases, the victim was under 12 years old. The cases we found run from the first weeks of the war up to July this year.”Israel’s military system seems to permit the IDF to treat Palestinian children under a martial law pretext. Al-Jazeera reports 26th January 2025:Al-Jazeera reports 26th January 2025:“An estimated 10,000 Palestinian children have been held in Israeli military detention over the past 20 years, according to the NGO Save the Children. Reasons for the arrest of children range from stone-throwing to participation in a gathering of merely 10 people without a permit, on any issue ‘that could be construed as political’. Under what law are children detained by Israel? Controversially, Palestinian prisoners are tried and sentenced in military rather than civil courts. International law permits Israel to use military courts in the territory that it occupies. A dual legal system exists in Palestine, under which Israeli settlers living in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem are subject to Israeli civil law while Palestinians are subject to Israeli military law in courts run by Israeli soldiers and officers. This means that a large number of Palestinians are imprisoned without basic due process.”Subscribe now3) Wounded Israeli Veteran Gives Evidence Implicating Netanyahu in Oct 7 Attacks Israel’s behaviour towards Palestinian children is ruining its reputation abroad. Demands made on the country by former Israeli intelligence and IDF chiefs, and global allies, to end this “messianic and extremist” war are trouble enough for Netanyahu. But such troubles have just become a great deal worse. Wounded Israeli October 7th war veteran from the Gaza border, Shalom Sheetrit has given evidence to the Israeli Knesset (parliament) further corroborating the view that Netanyahu facilitated the October 7th attacks in order to create a pretext for invading Gaza. Click to play:Israeli Gaza border soldier Shalom Sheetrit: “Six thirty in the morning, October 7th. You’re at the outpost. For us, October 7th starts before six thirty. I was a soldier in the mortar platoon of the Golani Brigade’s 13th Battalion, and that night myself, Yotam Sarur, my sergeant Tamar Ben Yehuda, may he rest in peace, the three of us were pulling an all-nighter. On Sabbaths and holidays we’d let ourselves pull an all-nighter until the dawn stand-to, and you know we in the mortar platoon have time to sleep until the next stand-to. So at 5:20am we’re sitting by the radio so as not to wake the radio operator, and my deputy battalion commander, Nir Boinflek, who was also seriously injured, and thank God he survived, suddenly gets on the radio with a strange message: ‘All the stations, I don't know why, I don't know how, something along those lines, no patrol on the fence until nine am. What time was this? 5:20 in the morning.”Leaked audio recording of the stand down order is played: “All stations are to hold their positions . So in terms of ground forces and Orev, we don’t have anything significant. The brigade issued a directive for our forces: pending a situation assessment until 9am. No vehicle is to approach Burma. I’ll say it again, until 9 in the morning, pending the situation assessment, no vehicle is to go down to Burma. We’re in rear staging areas. A brigade level arrangement. I don’t know exactly why. I don’t ask too many questions. That’s the directive, that’s what we do.”Shalom Sheetrit: “A little before it all begins, and Tomer gives us this look like ‘what?’ And you know, we’re simple soldiers, combatants, not commanders or officers, who can ask questions. It’s an order from the deputy battalion commander, we take the order and don’t ask questions. A routine passing of an order. And sure enough, an hour later, at 6:30, suddenly sirens…..Iri, I'll tell you the truth, I've been living with this since October 7th. And I was very afraid to talk about it. And when I got to the Knesset, it was after a period when I asked some senior army officers, ‘what actually happened there?’. And there were those who initially told me, ‘Listen, I'll tell you the truth, there was a sniper threat from Nukhba on the fence. So we didn’t want to send soldiers so they wouldn’t get hit’. And then over time it kind of dawned on me, and I said ‘wait, if there’s a sniper threat, how can it be that I - who am only 200 metres from the fence - don’t know that there’s a threat, how can it be that my friends are fighting without a vest, with underwear and socks, and nobody knows that something is happening’. We're only 200-300 meters from the fence. And then that was on my mind again, and really, I was suddenly invited to the Knesset. I felt that this was the real opportunity to open up this subject, and talk about it, and actually understand what happened there. And look, like you’re saying, to a lot of people it sounds strange, and actually what happened there and we're back to this again, and I'll be honest, Hila, we, I've been living with some kind of hole in my brain, since the October 7th, that something in my heart, feels to me that..listen, I don't know what was there, I don't know what was there, I want to understand what happened, like everyone.”Journalist: “Look, the deputy battalion commander wasn’t a sniper threat, because deputy battalion commander says: I have no idea why and why not. And a sniper threat happens many times. He says this in real time, at 5:20 in the morning, it’s not like someone told him to say that, he received an order, without an explanation. It’s…”Shalom Sheetrit: “Right, so we as soldiers, when we hear this thing, then of course we follow orders. It does sound a little strange to us, but soldiers in the field, and we've been on this line for almost half a year, and a few losses here and there. You know, from a loss to October 7th, there are...Yes, from breaches of order, true, right, from breaches of order to a situation of events like those of October 7th, we are talking here about, you know, something that’s surreal, that’s very extreme, to think that one day we would get to this.”Journalist: “Have you talked amongst yourselves since? After it (the recording of the stand down order) was published.”Shalom Sheetrit: “So of course we talked about it many times. And we tried to look into it. And I told you what all sorts of military people told me. I thought many times about talking about it, not talking about it, and at some point I also started to deny my own logic. ‘Wait, if they tell me there’s no sniping, as you say, how is there a threat? If he said I don’t know why and how..’ And I also, you know, I said maybe I don’t remember well, maybe it was that, and suddenly the recording comes out. You know, I have a responsibility here. I can’t talk about something like that on television. And there are consequences to what I say. So suddenly this thing popped up. And this recording was published. And what can I tell you. Like me, like you, like all the people of Israel, I want to understand what happened on October 7th. I lost many, many friends. I was seriously injured. Every day I meet with the families, with the parents, and really you don’t know how painful it is to handle it and support them. And people see me, Shalom, the one who lifted the wounded, they don’t know how many things I’m trying to do. I wake up to a war every day. I’m trying to reinvent myself. I’m trying to help these families. Every day is a war in itself. Also fighting without a leg.” Journalist: “You mean about that, to live a new life?” Shalom Sheetrit: “Yes, the injury exactly, and also to reinvent yourself. To move forward in life. Not to dwell on this. You know, in the end I was given my life. I also need to move on with my life. I can’t stay stuck in the same place. ‘I’m missing a leg poor me.’ I want to understand what happened there and suddenly this thing that came out. This statement, it scares me, it scares me a lot. I hope we’ll have clearer answers later on, and not to jump to conclusions, and not to worry an entire country, but it is very important that there are unequivocal answers here, and whoever needs to pay the price, should pay the price. So many murdered, kidnapped. It’s something that I, as a soldier, who served in the Gaza sector, I’m telling you, for every little thing, we would jump to the fence, for every little thing. It scares me, it scares me to think about what happened there.”As usual corporate media has ignored this hugely significant Israeli testimony, leaving only certain online outlets to cover it. The Cradle reports 31st July 2025:The Cradle reports 31st July 2025:“An Israeli soldier stated that he and his fellow soldiers stationed at a military outpost near Gaza received orders not to carry out their usual early morning patrol on the border fence on 7 October 2023, Israeli media reported on 17 July. During the time the border patrol would have normally been carried out, members of Hamas's armed wing, the Qassam Brigades, crossed the fence to attack Israeli army bases and settlements (kibbutzim). Shalom Sheetrit, a soldier in the Golani Brigade, revealed the directive while giving testimony at a meeting of the lobby for reserve personnel in the Israeli Knesset….’We were playing on the phone [at 5:20 am] and suddenly a strange message comes from my battalion commander,’ the soldier explained, ‘and what he says on the call is something like this: ‘I don't know why, but an order was issued that there are no patrols at the fence until nine in the morning.’ Sheetrit said soldiers from the outpost carried out patrols on the border fence every morning ‘because you are in an operational battalion and that is part of the matter.’ Hamas fighters attacked the Pega outpost and killed 14 Israeli soldiers there during Operation Al-Aqsa Flood…When asked if this was why many soldiers at the outpost were still sleeping when the Hamas attack began, Sheetrit stated, ‘I don't know how to answer it that way. In our mortar department, there was an alert at dawn, and we woke up. It's possible that in the patrol departments, they were told not to wake up. I don't know. I don't want to just say that’….”The implications of this testimony are horrific for the Israeli, and wider Western public. The Cradle reports 31st July 2025:“...The strange order to cancel routine patrols along the Gaza border adds to evidence that Israeli political and military leaders knew in advance about Hamas's plan to attack on 7 October – and allowed it to happen to justify the conquest and ethnic cleansing of Gaza and the building of Jewish settlements on top of the ruins of the strip's soon-to-be-destroyed cities. Israeli military and intelligence officials ignored many signals on the night before the attack, and in the previous weeks and months, indicating that Hamas was planning a large attack to take captives to exchange for Palestinian prisoners. Female Israeli soldiers tasked to observe activity on the Gaza border issued multiple warnings to their superiors that an attack was imminent, but they were ignored.”Shalom Sheetrit’s testimony adds a final piece to the puzzle of what exactly happened on October 7th, and how was it allowed to happen. It is now more probable than not that everything the Likudniks initially claimed after October 7th was an absolute lie. Tragically, most of the charred remains of Israeli Nova music festival goers and kibbutzim are presumed to have been caused by Israeli airforce bombs deploying the infamous Hannibal Directive. The Cradle reports 31st July 2025:“After the attack began, the Israeli air force deployed Apache Helicopters, tanks, and drones to bomb the kibbutz and the Gaza border nearby to prevent Hamas from taking captives with them back to Gaza. As a result, Israeli forces burned to death hundreds of Israeli civilians and Hamas fighters in airstrikes in Be'eri and other kibbutzim near the border, as well as at the Nova Music Festival, per a secretive policy known as the Hannibal Directive. The deaths were all quickly blamed on Hamas.”This is a military protocol that demands the IDF kill everyone in case of an apparent hostage situation.Click to play:Israeli reserve pilot Col. Nof Erez: “We don’t know whether the hostages were hit once gunships and drones started to fire at the fence, once they saw the mass traffic through the fence that was coming in and coming out.”Journalist: “But Hannibal Directive is intentional, if it was deployed it was an intentional act - if hostages were hit (unintentionally) then that is (obviously) something else.”Col. Nof Erez: “The Hannibal Directive was probably deployed because once you detect a hostage situation, this is Hannibal. But the Hannibal we have been conducting drills for the over the past 20 years, relates to the case of a single vehicle containing hostages - you know which part of the fence it comes through, what side of the road it would move to, and even which road. What we saw here was a MASS HANNIBAL. There were many openings in the fence, thousands of people, in many different vehicles, both with hostages and without hostages, it was an impossible mission to identify, and to do what they (the pilots) did. I know that whoever had the weapons systems available, broth drones and gunship pilots did whatever they could without the coordination with ground forces, because these weren’t around.”In short, and on the face of the available evidence, it is now quite certain that Netanyahu facilitated the October 7th attacks in order to create a pretext to invade and occupy Gaza, by issuing a stand down order and then ordering the Israeli Air Force to incinerate to death all Israeli civilians at the Gaza border who were at risk of being taken captive by Hamas battalions during this terrorist incursion.From day one, former Israeli military whistleblower Efrat Fenigson has been making the allegation that Netanyahu facilitated the October 7th attacks. Radical Media reports 15th October 2023:Here is the full link to Shalom Sheetrit's testimony from July 10th 2024 in the Israeli Knesset (parliament). And here is the full link to Shalom Sheetrit's recent interview, after the recording of the stand down order was released:The shocking testimony of Shalom Sheetrit has been further publicly corroborated by former Israeli PM Ehud Barak, and Ami Ayalon the former head of Israel’s domestic intelligence the Shin Bet, who have also both alleged that Netanyahu worked with Hamas. Click to play:Journalist: “So are you saying Benjamin Netanyahu deliberately boosted Hamas to try to prevent a Palestinian state?”Former Israeli PM Ehud Barak: “Yeah, sure. He deliberately and systematically, even told, on record, whoever wants to avoid the threat of a two-state solution has to support my policy of paying protection money to the Hamas.” Former head of Shin Bet, Ami Ayalon: “So what we did with the permission of our Prime Minister is to let Qatar to transfer a huge amount of money in cash. Probably more than $1.4 billion. By doing it, we increased the power of Hamas. We did everything in order to make sure that Hamas will go on controlling Gaza. And Palestinian Authority will control the West Bank, so they will fight each other.”Journalist: “Netanyahu maintains that Qatar money was to avoid a humanitarian catastrophe. Having helped to build up Hamas, Netanyahu has now vowed to destroy it.”Former Israeli commander Yehuda Shaul: “He fed the beast and it exploded in our face. If you base your national security strategy solely on force, then you need to win 24-7 forever.”Israel’s domestic intelligence service Shin Bet has been making this argument, that the October 7th terrorist attack by Hamas was highly likely to have been facilitated years in advance, by Netanyahu, in the open for a while now.Jerusalem Post reports 24th March 2025:Jerusalem Post reports 24th March 2025:“While the Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) took a significant amount of responsibility for the disasters on October 7 in its report published unexpectedly on Tuesday, it also implicated Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by implying that his policies regarding the Temple Mount, the treatment of Palestinian prisoners, and the judicial reform led to Hamas’s decision to initiate its long-planned invasion.Other policies carried out under Netanyahu that the agency flagged as problematic and as contributions to Hamas’s decision to invade were his facilitation of Qatari funding to Hamas and his opposition to proposed assassination operations of top Hamas leaders at the time.”That last allegation made by the head of Shin Bet: ‘[Netanyahu’s] opposition to proposed assassination operations of top Hamas leaders at the time’ was explained in detail by the Radical Dispatch 18th October 2024:This view goes some way to explaining why Israel’s CCTV footage at the Gaza border from October 7th has since disappeared. It forms the background to why yet another Israeli head of Shin Bet Ronen Bar, is reported to have resigned in open disgust at Netanyahu.The Times reports 28th April 2025:The Times reports 28th April 2025:“Israel’s spy chief has announced his resignation over the failure of the security establishment to prevent the October 7 massacre by Hamas. Ronen Bar, the head of the Shin Bet, Israel’s domestic intelligence service, said he would step down on June 15 — nearly three months after Binyamin Netanyahu tried to dismiss him, saying he no longer trusted him. The sacking was blocked by the Supreme Court after a petition by opposition parties who said it constituted a conflict of interest motivated by the agency’s investigations into a corruption scandal involving Netanyahu’s closest aides.”All of this was outlined by Radical Media only a week after the October 7th attacks.Click to play:Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED: “But you can see there at the bottom of this image, we'd already published all of this for you in the Radical Dispatch as far back as the 15th of October 2023, only a few days after the October the 7th attacks, that same few weeks after the attacks we published, next week, in fact, after the attacks, we published that headline that's at the bottom of the screen for you: ‘Netanyahu Funded and Supported Hamas for War - Receipts’. You can see it being compared with the later 2025 headline from March by the Jerusalem Post, above it. It's almost identical. The Jerusalem Post says: ‘Netanyahu's Funding for Hamas via Qatar Enabled October the 7th Invasion, Shin Bet Reveals,’ and ours from two years prior in the Radical Dispatch: ‘Netanyahu Funded and Supported Hamas for War...The Shadow Knows.”So much for the Likudnik-Zionist talking point accusing any who oppose Israel’s war in Gaza as somehow being ‘pro-Hamas’.Subscribe now4) Unilateral Threats Mean Little Devoid of Regional EffortsThe aim of false flag operations such as what appears to have transpired on October 7th (as shown above) would be to scupper any Middle East peace efforts being made by the Trump administration and other anti-globalist leaders around the world. Those who seek to scupper peace efforts are globalists who crave repeated pretexts for permawar in service of a one-world technocratic surveillance state.As negotiations led by Trump’s peace envoy Steve Witkoff between Israel and Hamas in Qatar break down, it is worth remembering that the Israeli demand for Hamas to unconditionally release all hostages has formed a key and intractable point of contention contributing to the breakdown of talks. These Israeli hostages deserve every sympathy. As do the over 300 Palestinian child hostages that Israel is revealed to be holding. And though our above post should have specified Israeli, not foreign national prisoners such as Nepalese Bipin Joshi, the basic takeaway remains accurate. i) Hamas are terrorists.ii) By definition, so is the one who funded & facilitated them: Netanyahu & his Likudnik-Zionist network. iii) Hamas and Israel are guilty of war crimes and have been for many years. iv) Israel is guilty of ethnic cleansing in Gaza, and - according the former Chief Justice of the UK Supreme Court Lord Sumption, “most plausibly genocide”. v) Release all hostages, yes. Including the approximately 300 human child hostages held by the Israeli government.Considering Iran’s role in also backing Hamas in Gaza - curiously, this places Iran on the Likudnik-Zionist side of the Gaza war - it is clear that no solution to the conflict stands much of a chance without adopting a negotiated regional approach. Pro-Israel British lawyers are already making a case to legally complicate Starmer’s unilateral declaration.The Times reports 31st July 2025:“Some of Britain’s most prominent lawyers have warned Sir Keir Starmer that his government’s pledge to recognise a Palestinian state risks breaking international law. Their intervention, signed by 40 members of the House of Lords, said a Palestinian state would not meet the criteria for recognition as set out under the Montevideo Convention, a treaty signed in 1933….…’You have said that a selective ‘pick and mix’ approach to international law will lead to its disintegration, and that the criteria set out in international law should not be manipulated for reasons of political expedience. Accordingly, we expect you to demonstrate this commitment by explaining to the public and to the government that recognition of Palestine would be contrary to the principles governing recognition of states in international law. We look forward to your response’.The 1933 treaty, signed in the Uruguayan capital, laid out the four key criteria for statehood in international law. The treaty says a state must possess a permanent population, a defined territory, a government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states. The letter added that there is no certainty over the borders of a proposed Palestinian state, while the government would face difficulty continuing to recognise millions of Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza as ‘refugees’, given recognition of statehood would mean they were in their own territory.They also argued that there is no functioning single government, and it has no capacity to enter into diplomatic relations. Hamas is a proscribed terror group in the UK.”Clearly nothing moves in international relations that is devoid of international diplomacy, which means negotiation. But there already exists a framework for such a negotiated regional approach to Palestinian statehood. This approach, known as the…To continue reading and to gain access to all other paywalled content, become a premium member of Radical Media. Read more

Trump Names Epstein Suspects on Trip to Scotland & Humiliates UK PM Starmer

This Radical Dispatch Newszine - below - is provided free for all subscribers.At the top of this post, Resistance Radio presents our WARRIOR CREED video/audio podcast from Tuesday 29th July 2025, with a transcript provided - Trump Names Epstein Suspects on Trip to Scotland & Humiliates UK PM Starmer.This podcast can be set to either audiovisual, or just audio, and is for premium members of Radical Media only. To listen, basic members should upgrade to the premium service here:ShareRead on now for our free Radical Dispatch.Subscribe nowShareTrump Names Epstein Suspects on Trip to Scotland & Humiliates UK PM Starmer- A Radical Dispatch1) Trump Names Epstein SuspectsDuring his recent visit to Scotland, President Trump put to bed allegations - recently weaponised by Elon Musk - that he was implicated in the Epstein files, by explicitly naming names of those who actually “ran the files”. Click to play:Reporter: “You have not been briefed on the Epstein files, or your name has not appeared in the Epstein files. But doesn't the AG have to tell you if your name is in the files?”President Trump: “Well, I haven't been overly interested in it. It's a hoax that's been built up way beyond proportion. I can say this. Those files were run by the worst scum on Earth. They were run by Comey. They were run by Garland. They were run by Biden, and all of the people that actually ran the government, including the autopen. Those files were run for four years by those people. If they had anything, I assume they would have released it. The whole thing is a hoax. They ran the files. I was running against somebody that ran the files. If they had something, they would have released. Now, they can easily put something in the files that's a phoney. Like, as an example, Christopher Steele, a person you know well, happens to be from your country. But Christopher Steele, as an example, wrote a book, a dossier. We call it the fake news dossier. And the whole thing was a fake. The whole thing was a fake. They could put things in the file that are fake, but those files were run by bad, sick people. If they had anything, why didn't they use it when I was killing Joe and then he gave out because he was 25 points down? And then I got somebody new. Nobody even knew anything about her. She was a horrible vice president. She was a border tsar, but she never went to the border. She never once called a border patrol agent to find out how to do it, but she was the border tsar. Her name was Kamala. Nobody knows her last name. It was Harris, but nobody knew her last name. So I ended up, how would you like to end up in a race where you're killing somebody? You're beating him. And then they say, all right, well, take him out. He's not working. Let's put somebody else. And then she had a six week honeymoon. It was amazing. They predicted she would have a six week honeymoon and she did. And then she got slaughtered…but think of it. Those files were run by these people. They were run by my enemy. If there was anything in there, they would have used them for the election.”Reporter: “...that drawing that, I think I heard you say something the other day, the drawing that was the subject of the Wall Street Journal report?” President Trump: “I don't do drawings. I'm not a drawing person…I don't do drawings. Sometimes people would say, ‘well you drew a building’ and I'll draw four lines and a little roof, you know, for a charity or something. But I'm not a drawing person. I don't do drawings of women, that I can tell you. They say there's a drawing of a woman. And I don't do drawings of women. And also, you know, Epstein was always a very controversial guy. I was at a very high position, you know, pretty much all my life, in all fairness. I've been doing this for a long time. I had the top show on television. I had the number one best sellers. I had everything, right? And I was a very successful business guy. He was very controversial. Who would do a controversial drawing? Now, with that being said, they say there were many letters done by many people, and many big people, you know, big successful people. But I just, I just don't, when you, you know, when you talk about files, I just keep going back. And other people too, even the enemy says this thing is not correct. Because if we had it, we would have used it on the guy. It's a bad issue. They say it's a good issue for Trump. Do you know that my poll numbers are up four and a half points since this ridiculous Epstein stuff? My poll numbers have gone up four and a half points, because people don't buy it. Okay? People don't buy it. And he's gone. And we want to focus on trade deals. I want to focus on the deal we just made with the European Union, which is the biggest trade deal in history. It's the biggest deal, I think, in history, not just trade deal. So if they would have had something, they would have used it.”Reporter: “And people keep saying that by the time you threw him out of Mar a Lago, can you settle that? What was it about? What caused the breach with him?”President Trump: “That's such old history. Very easy to explain, but I don't want to waste your time by explaining it. But for years, I wouldn't talk to Jeffrey Epstein. I wouldn't talk because he did something that was inappropriate. He hired help. And I said, don't ever do that again. He stole people that work for me. I said, don't ever do that again. He did it again. And I threw him out of the place. Persona non grata. I threw him out. And that was it. I'm glad I did, if you want to know the truth. And by the way, I never went to the island. And Bill Clinton went there, supposedly, 28 times. I never went to the island, but Larry Summers, I hear, went there. He was the head of Harvard. And many other people that are very big people, nobody ever talks about that. I never had the privilege of going to his island. And I did turn it down, but a lot of people in Palm Beach were invited to his island. In one of my very good moments, I turned it down. I didn't want to go to his island.“Here Trump has named Obama’s former FBI head James Comey, Obama’s Attorney General Merrick Garland, President Biden, VP Kamala Harris, President Clinton and former head of Harvard University Larry Summers. Radical Media has been similarly naming such names for over a year.Radical Media reports 3rd Jan 2024:Again, as we reported over a year ago, Trump had already named President Clinton as having “a lot of problems coming up” with the Epstein files back in 2015, before he became president for his first term. Radical Media reports 11th January 2024:Click to play:This explosive allegation was made by Trump while President Bill Clinton and his presidential candidate wife Hillary were at the peak of their power. Trump makes the simple point that had there been anything on him, they would have used it back then before he even became president, let alone during his aborted 2020 election campaign, or indeed his 2024 success, while they tried everything else to stop him.Subscribe now2) Ghislaine Maxwell Provides “100 Names”Before naming specific individuals from Scotland, Trump’s Department of Justice (DOJ) had also reopened inquiries with Ghislaine Maxwell, confirming that Maxwell spoke openly about “100 different people”. Click to play:Fox News host Jesse Watters: “Justice Department lawyers visited Ghislaine Maxwell in prison for the second day in a row, and they had a lot of questions.”Maxwell Lawyer: “They asked about every single, every possible thing you could imagine, everything. Maybe about a hundred different people. She answered questions about everybody, and she didn't hold anything back.”Jesse Watters: “Maxwell was reportedly given limited immunity so she could speak freely during the meetings with Deputy AG Todd Blanche. Maxwell's getting chatty because she wants a pardon. Her lawyer claims the deal with Epstein, made with federal prosecutors back in 2008, should keep her out of prison.”Maxwell Lawyer: “We're appealing on a very important ground, which is the government at the time promised Jeffrey Epstein that any potential co-conspirators would not be prosecuted. And so she deserves that promise. President Trump is the ultimate dealmaker. He knows that a promise made on behalf of the government should bind the government.” Jesse Watters: “But Donald Trump says the thought of a pardon hasn't even crossed his mind.”Reporter: “Would you consider a pardon or a commutation for Ghislaine Maxwell if you cooperated?”President Trump: “It's something I haven't thought about. I'm allowed to do it, but it's something I have not thought about.”According to The Guardian, the ostensible purpose for the DOJ questioning Maxwell was to acquire “information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims.” This may serve as confirmation that, for now, the investigation into who Epstein’s clients were is reopened, while Maxwell is being provided “limited immunity” in exchange for her cooperation. The Guardian reports 25 July 2025:“Blanche had announced earlier in the week that he had contacted Maxwell’s lawyers to see if she might have ‘information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims’.”Seeming to confirm this fact, and even prior to naming those names in Scotland, Trump reiterated that Deputy Attorney General (AG) Todd Blanche is acting in this capacity, and hinted that the “president of Harvard” is a prime suspect.Click to play:President Trump: “(Ghislaine Maxwell is) being talked to by a very smart man, by a very good man, (Deputy US Attorney General) Todd Blanche. And I don't know anything about the conversation. I haven't really been following it. A lot of people are asking me about pardons. Obviously, this is no time to be talking about pardons. But a lot of people have asked about pardon. This is just not a time to be talking about pardons. Todd will come back with whatever he's got. You make it a very big thing over something that's not a big thing. You should be talking about, if you're going to talk about that, talk about Clinton. Talk about the former president of Harvard. Talk about all of his friends. Talk about the hedge fund guys that were with him all the time don't talk about Trump. What you should be talking about is the fact that we have the greatest six months in the history of a presidency, according to a lot of people.”By mentioning a former president of Harvard university, Trump is referencing Clinton and Obama era administration official Larry Summers, who provided Epstein with an office at Harvard. Who is Larry Summers?This all appears to confirm that Ghislaine Maxwell is being prepared to potentially testify if needed against some or all of Epstein’s powerful clients. We mentioned this gaping hole in the Epstein case previously. Radical Media reports 9th July 2025:“The most obvious hole in the official story concerns Ghislaine Maxwell. Logically, the state cannot have it both ways. It cannot at one and the same time claim that Epstein madam Ghislaine Maxwell’s conviction is sound, while also claiming that she is in jail for trafficking underage girls to absolutely nobody.”This is why the current globalist obsession with pinning the Epstein saga on Trump would be the most spectacular own goal ever. The Hill reports 21 July 2025:Subscribe now3) Trump DOJ’s Second Investigation Involving a PresidentAs Deputy AG Todd Blanche’s investigation with Ghislaine Maxwell into the Epstein clients continues, Trump’s DNI Tulsi Gabbard filed her own documents with the DOJ that implicated yet another former president, Obama. This brings the list of former American presidents that are currently being investigated by the Trump administration for the high crimes of treason and blackmail to three: Clinton, Biden and Obama. DNI Gabbard’s filings with the DOJ implicate the same intelligence community names that Trump listed in Scotland as being involved in the Epstein scandal too. Radical Media reports 24 July 2025:The next day, CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey, and DNI James Clapper all met at the Obama White House to reassess the Russian threat level. Obama is then alleged to have instructed his assembled national security team to create a new intelligence assessment that specifically detailed Russian election meddling, clearly contradicting the previous assessments reproduced above.DNI Gabbard then accuses Obama’s national security apparatus of leaning on their assets in the media to advance these falsehoods against president-elect Trump.For politicising and weaponising the intelligence apparatus against president-elect Trump, DNI Gabbard has specifically accused the “highest levels” inside the Obama administration of “treason“.Here she is stating as much from the White House itself about this news.Click to play:DNI Gabbard: “Thank you very much. Good afternoon. At President Trump's direction and with the support and coordination with the House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford, today we've released a declassified oversight majority staff report that was produced in September of 2020. The stunning revelations that we are releasing today should be of concern to every American. This is not about Democrats Republicans, this has to do with the integrity of our democratic republic and American voters having faith that the votes cast will count. There is irrefutable evidence that detail how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help President Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't. The report that we released today shows in great detail how they carried this out. They manufactured findings from shoddy sources. They suppressed evidence and credible intelligence that disproved their false claims. They disobeyed traditional tradecraft intelligence community standards and withheld the truth from the American people. In doing so, they conspired to subvert the will of the American people who elected Donald Trump in that election in November of 2016. They worked with their partners in the media to promote this lie, ultimately to undermine the legitimacy of President Trump and launching what would be a years-long coup against him and his administration. We're here today because the American people deserve the truth, they deserve accountability, and they deserve justice….I'm going to go over the key findings from the House Intelligence Report, which investigated the claims that were made by an intelligence community assessment ordered by President Obama and published in January of 2017.First, Putin's principal interests relating to the 2016 election were to undermine faith in the US democratic process, not show any preference of a certain candidate. In fact, this report shows Putin held back from leaking compromising material on Hillary Clinton prior to the election, instead planning to release it after the election to weaken what Moscow viewed as an inevitable Clinton presidency. In the January 2017 intelligence community assessment that President Obama ordered, John Brennan, who was CIA director at the time, and the intelligence community, intentionally suppressed intelligence that showed Putin was saving the most damaging material that he had in his possession about Hillary Clinton until after her potential and likely victory. The report goes into great detail about the information that Russia and Putin had on Hillary Clinton, which included possible criminal acts like secret meetings with multiple named US religious organisations in which State Department officials offered, in exchange for supporting Secretary Clinton's campaign for the presidency, significant increases in financing from the State Department. They also had documents that showed the patronage of the State Department to State Department employees who would go and support Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign. There were high-level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's, quote, psycho-emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness, and that then-Secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers. Then CIA Director Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterised intelligence and relied on dubious substandard sources to create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a ‘clear preference’ for Trump. Brennan and the IC (Intelligence Community) misled lawmakers by referencing the debunked Steele dossier to assess ‘Russia's plans and intentions’, falsely suggesting that this dossier had intelligence value when he knew that it was discredited. The intelligence community excluded significant intelligence and ignored or selectively quoted reliable intelligence that contradicted the intelligence community assessment's key findings on Putin's alleged support for Trump. Including this intelligence reporting would have exposed the ICA's claim as implausible, if not ridiculous. The intelligence community assessment omitted reliably sourced information such as how some Russian intelligence officials were ‘planning for candidate Hillary Clinton's victory’, while others assessed neither Trump nor Clinton would respect Russia's interests. As was reflected in the ODNI documents that we released on Friday, multiple intelligence community assessments released in the months leading up to the November 2016 election concluded that Russia had neither the intent nor capability to impact the outcome of the US election. On December 5th of 2016, the FBI and ODNI gave the House Intelligence Committee its first post-election classified briefing in which there was no mention of Putin aspiring to elect Trump by either agency.”Days after DNI Gabbard used the word “treason” to describe Obama’s actions, President Trump weighed in using the very same word.Click to play:Trump: “If you look at those papers they have them stone cold, and it was President Obama. It wasn't lots of people all over the place, it was them too, but the leader of the gang was President Obama, Barack Hussein Obama, have you heard of him? And except for the fact that he gets shielded by the press for his entire life that's the one they look, he's guilty. It's not a question. You know, I like to say, let's give it time. It's there. He's guilty. This was treason. This was every word you can think of. They tried to steal the election. They tried to obfuscate the election. They did things that nobody's ever even imagined, even in other countries.”This “treasonous” coup plot against Trump lasted throughout his first term and culminated in the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story and the ousting of President Trump, first from social media and then from office after an unsound 2020 election.Those implicated include the 51 intelligence community personnel who have been shown to have lied when they accused Russia of being behind the suppressed Hunter Biden laptop story.Radical Media reports 22nd January 2025:It has now been shown that these 51 national security officials knew the Hunter Biden laptop was real at the time. Thus rendering their behaviour not only blatant election interference, but also malicious collusion, and so treason.Subscribe now4) Treason is a Very Serious MatterTo summarise, the Trump administration’s DOJ are currently running two investigations involving three former presidents. One investigation involves the Epstein case, and the other revolves around the Russia-collusion hoax. Both investigations are connected. They are perhaps best summarised in the following terms: Mossad and the CIA, perhaps with Mi6 involvement, were running a decades long honeytrap blackmail operation using Kompromat to coerce at least three presidents and other powerful figures around the world into betraying their countries and committing treason by instigating a global palace coup. In the US this coup was against President Trump. It started in 2016, continued through the 2020 election cycle and went into the 2024 US presidential race. Elsewhere around the world this was most visible in the introduction of simultaneous Covid mandates that sought to crush all dissent, so that the military-industrial complex could continue its global policy of permawar leading to a one-world globalist technocracy.Click to play:Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED: “But what is directly being alleged by both DNI Gabbard in that video, and now by Trump in Scotland, we're going to summarise for you in the following sentence, just to give you a full summary of everything we've covered to this point in the stream: Trump, his administration, DNI Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence, his DOJ, Department of Justice, they are building a case, very specifically, that blackmail via the Epstein files was used perhaps by Larry Summers, certainly by Epstein, who perhaps Larry Summers was weaponising against at least two sitting presidents, Bill Clinton and President Obama, in order to force them to coup another president at the time, President Trump. Because of course they were bound by the blackmail to do the bidding of those such as the handlers, like Wall Street stalwart Larry Summers. And the purpose of this blackmail was to steer the United States of America towards their permawar policies. And, of course, that would be treason, and it would be betrayal and it would also be a war crime. But that's what is being alleged by the ongoing investigation. In this case, it is being explicitly alleged by DNI Gabbard..by naming Obama that they attempted to coup Trump. It has now also been explicitly alleged by Trump by naming Bill Clinton that there was Kompromat on these people. He's named Larry Summers. And it doesn't take a genius to join the dots together and understand what we've just said. What is being alleged was that those names named were involved in a Mossad-run blackmail operation to use and leverage Kompromat against those presidents in order to steer US policy in their favour. And in their favour would mean in the favour of Wall Street and its military-industrial complex and permanent war policy. And that perhaps Larry Summers role in all of that was to act as the handler for Obama and Clinton, hence Trump naming him now in Scotland.”As strange as it sounded when we first made this allegation of a global palace coup on episode 1780 of the Joe Rogan show, by now the Trump administration has been explicitly making these same allegations publicly, and repeatedly. Since PM Starmer is a known ally of these treasonous globalists, Trump went on to troll his UK counterpart from his visit to Scotland, by telling Starmer that he was destined to lose unless he practically copied Nigel Farage, who we here at Radical Media have said repeatedly will be the next PM of the UK. In this video Trump effectively tells PM Starmer to copy the Reform Party’s platform, if he wishes to stay in power.To continue reading and to gain access to all other paywalled content, become a premium member of Radical Media. Read more