Ian Roffman advises boards, directors and company executives when there is trouble - a government subpoena, a whistleblower complaint, a letter or a phone call from a government regulator. In this episode we talk about what a board and management should do when this happens - and how they can position themselves in advance for an inquiry by the government.
Big Ideas/Thoughts/Quotes:
Our guest Ian Roffman helps boards, directors and company executives when they're facing what can be a significant moment in the existence of a company. Those moments can come upon the receipt of a government subpoena, a whistleblower complaint or even something as seemingly innocuous as a letter or a phone call from a government regulator. Ian comes in to help the boards, help individual directors and help executives as they make their way through those sometimes sticky periods.
One of the most important things a company or a board can do when there is a government inquiry is to try to get its arms around the issue as soon as possible. There's a balance that boards need to strike between speed and hastiness. You want to act quickly, but not at the expense of good judgment.
The desire to ignore or push off bad news can be pretty strong, but directors have a duty to think about the steps that they need to take to reasonably make sure that they're fulfilling their duty to shareholders, employees and all of their relevant constituencies.
The SEC has said that there are the four benchmarks they will look at to evaluate whether a company and its board are good corporate citizens:
1. Self-policing (did you have in place good internal controls? Did you have a good risk function? Did you have an internal audit function, etc.?)
2. Self-reporting (was there transparency and speed in the reporting of the issue?)
3. Remediation (whatever the problem was, did you fix it?)
4. Cooperation (when we asked you for documents, did you give them to us? Did you also give us the documents that we didn't know to ask for? The SEC is very clear that cooperation doesn't just mean you did the things you're required to do. It means you did something extra.)
Even though other regulators don't use that same nomenclature, the concepts are always the same.
Question: When you get there and you see that there has been some, let's call it, avoidance or cover up, what kinds of things do you tell them to do then?
Answer. Often it comes from a really good place, which is that people see a problem and they try to fix it. Where it becomes a "cover up" rather than a solution is if there's a lack of transparency. Really, the key, when you identify a problem, is whether you're trying to fix it secretly versus trying to fix it transparently, and the fix might be identical, but a secret fix is a problem and a transparent fix is a solution.
Transparency and collaboration within an organization are among the most powerful things that companies can do to put themselves in a position to deal with regulatory inquiries.
Directors’ Duty of Oversight. The Marchand decision (2019) is sort of “Caremark duties on steroids.” The case involved the Blue Bell Ice Cream Company, which had a Listeria outbreak in its ice cream. The directors were sued, with a dereliction-of-duty-type theory. The Delaware Supreme Court said that directors have an active duty to oversee the operations of the company, especially when it comes to areas of significant risk within the important areas of the company's operations. In that instance, it was food safety. The director’s duty described in Marchand is much more active than what many boards had expected.
Whistleblowers. It's in the company's best interest to take a whistleblower complaint seriously - so listen to what it is, look into it. If there's something to it, deal with it. If there's nothing to it, make clear to the government that there's nothing to it, but do not be dismissive of your duty.
Insider trading. Insider trading investigations can be incredibly invasive because when the government is looking to see if someone engaged in insider trading, they know that people communicate on their phones and through WhatsApp, WeChat, Slack, Telegram, Snapchat and all those other apps, and so the government is going to go in and they will take your devices. They will require you to image your devices. They'll get forensic images of your device. It is incredibly invasive, and so what a company ought to do is manage its investigative risk around insider trading.
67. Michael Greeley on the trends in composition of boards in investor backed companies
66. Nav Singh on the future of Governance and Innovation
65. Dr. Angela Jackson on the Needham Bank Board and the Future of Work
64. Charles Shirley - Effective Governance and an Advisor’s Perspective
63. Stefania Mallett: Navigating board dynamics and entrepreneurial success at an investment backed startup
62. Diverse Leadership and AI Ethics: Jocelyn Moore on Transforming Governance
61. Culture Always Has A Seat At The Table
60. Lisa Thompson - Becoming an impactful board member
58. The groundbreaking, impactful work of The Partnership
57. What questions boards should be asking about AI
56. Meghan Juday - There is no business like a family business!
55. Alissa Hsu Lynch on Digital Transformation advice for Boards
54. Michael Peregrine on fiduciary duty and the impact SVB may have on the boardroom
53. Steve Gullans on Biotech Boards
52. Maria Doughty on Empowering Women to lead and The Chicago Network
51. Melissa Sampson McMorrow on the Governance of Impact Philanthropy
50. Maria Moats on the important issues facing boards in 2023
49. Jennifer Buras: Preparing for your first board seat
48. Bridget Ross: CEO and board member for the first time, at the same time
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
The emPOWERed Half Hour
HCI Leadership Revolution
Human Capital Leadership
The Power of Music Thinking
BusinessWISE
Business Wars