Somewhere in our training, most of us learned to keep our faces still. It arrived in the raised eyebrow of a supervisor, in the word neutral on a competency checklist, in the quiet sense that a good clinician does not flinch. And that discipline had an honorable origin: analytic abstinence, therapeutic neutrality, EMDR's own emphasis on trusting the client's system were all built to protect the client from something real: the therapist's agenda, the therapist's unexamined wounds. This episode honors what that tradition was guarding against, and...
Somewhere in our training, most of us learned to keep our faces still. It arrived in the raised eyebrow of a supervisor, in the word neutral on a competency checklist, in the quiet sense that a good clinician does not flinch. And that discipline had an honorable origin: analytic abstinence, therapeutic neutrality, EMDR's own emphasis on trusting the client's system were all built to protect the client from something real: the therapist's agenda, the therapist's unexamined wounds. This episode honors what that tradition was guarding against, and then asks the harder question it left unanswered: what does a blank slate cost a nervous system that came looking for another nervous system?
Drawing on Essay 2 of The Relational Thread, Bridger and Jen follow the felt reaction we were trained to smooth away and suggest it was never an interruption of the work — it may have been the work reaching for us. They walk through the therapist-effects research (the person of the therapist predicts outcome more robustly than the school they trained in), the turn Paula Heimann made in 1950 that still hasn't reached our fidelity checklists, and the right-brain-to-right-brain channel where there is no such thing as a neutral therapist. Even the Phase 6 body scan, ostensibly the most procedural moment in EMDR, turns out to be a relational event.
At the center is a word they keep reaching for: presencing. Not presence as a trait you either have or don't, but a verb: the moment-by-moment, embodied act of staying genuinely with someone, cultivated and lost and restored across a single session. This is the first turn in a series about the craft that makes the instrument usable. Come for the reframe of countertransference; stay for the quieter invitation to bring a self so well-known it becomes safe to work from.
In this episode
Bridger and Jen open Essay 2 of The Relational Thread and take up the person of the therapist, the part of the work so many of us were most carefully taught to remove. Starting from last week's claim that the relationship is doing the work, they follow it to the uncomfortable place it leads: if the relationship is the work, then we are the instrument, sitting there with a still face and moving insides.
Key themes
- What neutrality was built to protect, and what it can cost. Abstinence and the blank slate were designed to keep the therapist's material off the client. But a blank slate cannot co-regulate. And for a client shaped by misattunement, carefully maintained neutrality can register not as safety but as an eerily familiar absence.
- The research nobody foregrounds. When you account for model, manual, and technique and then ask how much of the outcome traces to which therapist the client saw, the answer is a meaningful, stubborn amount. The variable we're least trained to develop may be the one doing the most work.
- Countertransference as a second channel. Following Heimann (1950), the therapist's felt response is reframed from contamination to information, an instrument of research into the client's field, held with enough discipline to tell our weather from theirs.
- The body is not neutral. Beneath language, on the right-brain-to-right-brain channel, our groundedness is a signal and so is our bracing. There is no neutral therapist below the neck.
- Presencing. A verb, not a trait. The ongoing, embodied act of being genuinely with. And the thing that most reliably disrupts it is not the client but the therapist's own not enough.
Practical clinical takeaways (what you can bring into your next session)
- When something moves in you mid-session, treat it as data on a second channel. Hold it as a curiosity rather than a certainty, and ask whether it's yours, theirs, or (usually) a braid of both.
- Notice the internal monitor (am I doing this right, would my consultant approve) and recognize it as noise on the channel the client is reaching you on. When you leave contact to check your work, you have, for that moment, left.
- Consider the honest, disciplined disclosure as an intervention: As you notice your body, I'm aware of a heaviness in my own chest. I wonder if that resonates, or if your body is telling a different story. The client's experience stays centered; your nervous system stops pretending to be furniture.
- Treat Phase 6 as relational, not merely procedural: your body is part of the regulatory environment whether or not you intend it to be.
- Remember the felt sense is information, not verdict. And it's culturally tuned, carrying blind spots as surely as it carries wisdom.
Concepts, frameworks & names mentioned
- Therapist effects — Baldwin & Imel (2013); Wampold & Imel (2015), The Great Psychotherapy Debate. The person of the therapist as a robust predictor of outcome.
- Countertransference as instrument — Paula Heimann (1950); Karen Maroda, The Power of Countertransference (2004).
- Standing in the spaces — Philip Bromberg (2001): the therapist present to more than one self-state at a time.
- The social brain / co-regulation — Louis Cozolino, The Neuroscience of Psychotherapy (2017).
- Right-brain affective communication — Allan Schore (2012).
- Disorganized attachment & misattunement — Karlen Lyons-Ruth (1999).
- Being met, not managed — Jessica Benjamin (1995).
- Felt sense as information, not verdict — Hayes, Gelso & Hummel (2011).
- Cultural humility — Hook et al. (2017).
- Presencing, the move "from reverence to precision," and the relational reading of Phase 6 — from EMDR and the Therapeutic Relationship: Reclaiming the Relational Thread (Falkenstien & Savage).
Why this episode matters
Most continuing education adds another protocol to the shelf. This episode points at the practitioner holding them. If the person of the therapist is the instrument, then developing as a clinician isn't only accumulating technique — it's the slow work of becoming present enough to stay, so that when a client's old pattern braces for the familiar withdrawal, someone is actually there to disconfirm it. That's the through-line of the series this episode opens.
Listen & subscribe
The Relational Thread publishes one essay each week on the space between, the person of the therapist, and what happens when two nervous systems meet in the work of healing. Each essay is read aloud here on Notice That. Subscribing is free.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
View more
