While the furor over recent Congressional testimony by three prominent university presidents has died down somwhat (after the president of the University of Pennsylvania resigned), there are still important lessons to be learned from what went so badly wrong. In this episode, I consider how the presidents (and their litigation counsel) could have used Aristotle's three principles for successful communication (the balancing of ethos, pathos, and logos) to craft a more persuasive message ... and at least, avoid a public-relations disaster.
Interview with Dr. Ben Voth about James Farmer, Jr.
What is the Fifteenth Court's Precedent?
How Good is Generative AI? ChatGPT and I Co-Author a Tale
Can the Texas Supreme Court do that? "Adminstrative stays" in the state courts of Texas
Jury Consultant Jason Bloom Returns - The "New Normal" of Jury Selection for 2024
How to Fix Political-Candidate Debates
Slavery and the Republic of Texas Supreme Court: What Can we Learn?
Mifepristone May: Upcoming Argument About "Conservatism"
Are "Business Courts" Acceptable Under the Texas State Constitution?
Interview with ChatGPT
"WWHD"? How should courts use the question: "What Would Hamilton Do?"
Coale Kids on Book Bans, Dress Codes, and Motto Posters
Abortion Access as a Human Right: Interview With Julie F. Kay
The National Motto, the Texas Legislature, and the Southlake Dragons
God, Sex, Life, and Dobbs: Who are the "People's Elected Representatives"?
Abortion Travel Restrictions After Dobbs: Constitutional?
The Administrative State Strikes Back?
Originalism and its Discontents
Cities and Counties as Post-Roe Bulwarks: Who Are the "People's Elected Representatives"?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
City Manager Unfiltered
Potencial Americano
The ASIC Podcast
The Chris Plante Show
Red Eye Radio