There are a number of bills working their way through this year’s session of the Texas Legislature that will impact cities’ ability to guide development in a manner that ensures fiscal sustainability and affordability. Proposed bills address topics like: annexation/deannexation; prohibiting cities from requiring development value and infrastructure costs as a factor in development approvals; reducing the minimum lot size; and allowing accessory dwelling units by right. One side of the conversation centers on those who want to preserve personal property rights and are opposed to higher density development via smaller lots and units. From the local government side, city officials are concerned about losing the ability to guide what gets built and the impact it will have on their ability to provide services to current and future residents and businesses. Suffice to say these are very important discussions and decisions that will have significant impacts. This discussion is not limited to Texas, either. Numerous other states are having similar debates as pressure to address growing affordability and infrastructure costs increases at the state and local level.
In this episode, Kevin talks with two city management officials about which bills concern them and the unintended consequences that could result if they’re passed. Michael Kovacs, the City Manager of Fate, a fast growing suburb east of Dallas, and Tom Yantis, the Assistant City Manager of Taylor, a community outside Austin that recently landed one of the largest economic development deals in Texas with Samsung have been leaders in adjusting development processes to ensure their cities have the money they need to maintain quality services and infrastructure long-term while keeping housing and taxes affordable. Both cities received national awards for their Comprehensive Plans for embracing principles of fiscal sustainability. These two guys are extremely knowledgeable about how development impacts short and long-term costs and affordability, and how things “work” in Texas, so their input is worth listening to.
Discussions in Austin are ongoing and votes will start happening very soon, so we wanted to get this episode out quickly so it can be shared to inform voters, lobbyists, and especially our representatives in Austin that are casting votes.
-
Don't forget to take part in our 2023 podcast survey!
https://www.verdunity.com/2023survey
Announcing Season 2!
UPDATE! New opportunities, y'all
30 – [PART 2] Revitalization without gentrification?
29 – [PART 1] Revitalization without gentrification?
28 – A small city does the math on new development
27 – Making the jump toward more active towns, with John Simmerman
26 – Should states be setting a limit on city property taxes?
[B-Side] 25 - Dollars, decisions, and your city's future
25 - Dollars, decisions, and your city's future
24 – Your city's resource gap (and what you can do about it)
23 – Co-creating the city you want to live in, with Ben Orcutt
22 – Scaling the city: Have we gotten size all wrong?
Let's chat: Do apartments require more police?
21 – The favorites episode!
20 – Building a culture of engagement and trust, with Re:Form Shreveport
19 – Monte Anderson on incremental development (Part 2)
18 – Monte Anderson on incremental development (Part 1)
17 – Embracing the "messy" city, with Kevin Klinkenberg
16 – Economic development: questioning the status quo
15 – Is debt a bad thing for cities?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
City Manager Unfiltered
Potencial Americano
The ASIC Podcast
The Chris Plante Show
Strict Scrutiny