Your hosts discuss Navarette v. California, which held that an unverified anonymous tip about reckless driving could be sufficient grounds for the police to pull over a car. The case exemplifies how deferential the Supreme Court is to police power, and has resulted in an increased reliance on anonymous tips by the cops, and a corresponding erosion of citizens’ privacy rights.
Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
SB8: Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson
Welcome to Law School
Nestlé v. Doe
Stephen Breyer [TEASER]
Americans for Prosperity v. Bonta
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
Why Supreme Court Media Coverage Sucks [TEASER]
5-4 Presents: Know Your Enemy on the 1/6 Insurrection
Prologue Presents FIASCO: BENGHAZI
Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid
Textualism [TEASER]
Fulton v. Philadelphia
Fulton v. Philadelphia [TEASER]
Meet Nick Wallace
Smith v. Maryland
5-4 x Even More News - Abortion Rights
Brett Kavanaugh [TEASER]
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes
Prologue Presents: Celebrity Book Club on Johnnie Cochran
Jones v. Mississippi
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
City Manager Unfiltered
Potencial Americano
The ASIC Podcast
The Chris Plante Show
Strict Scrutiny