Defund the police. Abolish ICE. Redistribute the wealth. These are but a few of the one-liners that have emanated from the liberal wing of the Democratic party in recent years. With the emergence of “The Squad” in 2018 – or what began as four Democratic congresswomen who sought to push their party further left – liberal lawmakers have grown more prevalent in recent election cycles. And with just a slim 51-49 Democrat majority in the Senate, progressives are now eyeing 2024 as a way to strengthen their broader influence. By doing so, some say, the party risks aligning itself with ever more extreme politics, alienating moderate voices, and straying from what made it successful in the past. When President Bill Clinton was in office, they note, only 25 percent of Democrats described themselves as liberal; another 25 percent called themselves conservative, while an overwhelming 48 percent were self-described moderates. The equating of liberalism with Democratic policies, they argue, is a recent and dangerous trend, which makes governing more difficult. Others argue that the party is finally poised to make good what constitutes the reemergence of the political left, long stymied by the compromising influence of Washington and beltway politics. What’s more, they argue, this renewed focus on issues such as race, climate, income inequality has not only begun to address in earnest issues once paid only superficial notice, but is also electrifying the nation's progressive base in ways that can win elections. It is in this context that we debate the following question: Is The Democratic Party Too Far Left?
Arguing Yes: Coleman Huges (Conversations with Coleman), Ruy Teixeira (American Enterprise Institute)
Arguing No: Congressman Jamaal Bowman (NY-16), Alicia Garza (Co-founder of Black Lives Matter)
Emmy award-winning journalist John Donvan moderates
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Helen Fisher on How Genes Affect Your Politics
Intelligence Squared Year-Ender
Essential Workers or Elderly? Larry Brilliant on the Vaccine Debate
Agree to Disagree: Are Identity Politics a Way to Win?
#187 - Should We Stop Worrying About National Deficits?
Agree to Disagree: Are Election Lawsuits Good For Democracy?
#186 - Is a U.S.-China Space Race Good for Humanity?
Election Special: A Historian and Futurist Debate 2020
Discourse Disruptors: A Divided Nation – One Perspective
A Supreme Special Episode: Amy Coney Barrett & The State of SCOTUS
#185 - Is It Time to Redistribute the Wealth?
#184 - Unresolved: American Policing
#154 - Has Globalization Undermined the American Working Class?
Newt Minow on the Presidential Debates
Agree to Disagree: Should Washington Break Up Big Tech?
Agree to Disagree: Broadband for All?
#183 - Is Nationalism a Force for Good?
#164 - Should Social Media Companies Honor the First Amendment?
#182 - Will Coronavirus Reshape the World Order in China's Favor?
#181 - Has The Electoral College Outlived Its Usefulness?
Create your
podcast in
minutes
It is Free
Navigating Life After 40
Teaching Learning Leading K-12
Regenerative Skills
The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast
The Mel Robbins Podcast